Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T17:22:59.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Greene Baize Door

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Every creative writer worth our consideration, every writer who can be called, in the wide eighteenth-century use of the term, a poet, is a victim: a man given over to an obsession. . . . The obsession is perhaps most easily detected in the symbols a writer uses.’ These words written by Graham Greene in a review of Walter De la Mare’s short stories are illuminating in a study of Mr Greene’s own work, and in this brief paper I want to use them as a central point of reference, in attempting to show what is meant by calling Mr Greene’s work ‘poetic’. In a sense, my purpose is pre-critical since its emphasis falls on description rather than appraisal. Obviously, these are simply terms of convenience, and can never be exclusive of each other, but they serve to indicate an emphasis. Where Mr Greene’s work has been concerned, critical arrows have so easily felt the gravitational pull of moral and theological forces that the intended target has remained strangely untouched. This paper, flighted with a literary observation, tries to maintain direction by continually keeping in sight the idea that Graham Greene is a novelist and therefore the target primarily of the literary critic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1955 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 It would be unjust as well as ungracious to imply that there have been no helpful considerations of Mr Greene. There are, and my reading of Mr Greene has benefited from them, but they are few enough to permit a simple list: Kenneth Allott, The Art of Graham Greene, 1951; Richard Hoggart, ‘The Force of Caricature: Aspects of the Art of Graham Greene’, Essays in Criticism, 1953; Donat O'Donnell, Martia Cross, 1954; Elizabeth Sewell, ‘The Imagination of Graham Greene’, Dublin Review, 1954. For some of the suggestions in this paper I owe a personal acknowledgment to Mr Maurice Galton.

2 The same critical point could be made, on a lower level, of the novels of Raymond Chandler. The films that have been made of Mr Greene's novels show in striking terms how curiously deflated the situations become when seen and not read, in spite of their cinematic structure.

3 The Prelude, xii. 277, 280.Google Scholar