¹ Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2006. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 38 (2007), 303CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

² Pearce, J. and Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2016. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 48 (2017), 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The quantities of individual finds can be calculated by manipulating the data available on the PAS website (www.finds.org.uk).

³ Hoards continue to be published in full through the Coin Hoards of Roman Britain series, as well as the individual coins being reported on the PAS database. PAS hoard data continue to be used for the ongoing ‘Oxford Coin Hoards of the Roman Empire’ project (http://chre.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/content/about).

⁴ Robbins, K., ‘Balancing the scales: exploring the variable effects of collection bias on data collected by the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Landscapes 14 (2013), 54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A recently completed University of Nottingham doctoral thesis includes a major regional synthesis of PAS data from northern East Anglia, one of the regions richest in metal-detected finds: N. Harlow, Belonging and Belongings in the Civitas of the Iceni (2018).

⁵ Moorhead, S. and Walton, P., ‘Coins recorded with the Portable Antiquities Scheme: a summary’, Britannia 42 (2011), 432–7Google Scholar; Pearce and Worrell, op. cit. (note 2, 2017), 428–9.

⁶ A selection of the most important coins is published annually in the British Numismatic Journal by S. Moorhead.

⁷ Pearce, J. and Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2017. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 49 (2018), 401Google Scholar.

⁸ ibid., 401.

⁹ Henry, R., Roberts, D., Grant, M.J., Pelling, R. and Marshall, P., ‘A contextual analysis of the late Roman Pewsey and Wilcot vessel hoards, Wiltshire’, Britannia 50 (2019)Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X19000266.

¹⁰ The object descriptions present substantially revised versions of PAS database entries by the authors of this report. Further discussion of the form and significance of individual objects has been added.

¹¹ Our debt to Martin Henig will again be apparent from the footnotes and we once again thank him for his generosity in discussing many of the artefacts published here and others. We also note our gratitude to Michel Feugère for his comments on many objects. Any errors are of course our own responsibility. Finally, we also express our thanks to the Editor, Hella Eckardt for her comments on a draft and observations on individual objects.

¹² Found by J. Alderson. Identified and recorded by S. Lipscombe and B. Westwood.

¹³ Durham, E., ‘Depicting the gods: metal figurines in Roman Britain’, Internet Archaeology 31 (2012), 3.25Google Scholar http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue31/durham_index.html; Faider-Feytmans, G., Les bronzes romains de Belgique (1979), 87, no. 87, pl. 53Google Scholar; Fleischer, R., Die römischen Bronzen aus Österreich (1967), 90–3, nos 108–109a, 112, Taf. 58–9Google Scholar; Leibundgut, A., Die römischen Bronzen der Schweiz. III Westschweiz Bern und Wallis (1980), 63–4, nos 56, 58, Taf. 56, 58Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2005. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 37 (2006), 444, no. 12Google Scholar; Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2009. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 41 (2010), 430, no. 15Google Scholar.

¹⁵ Copper-alloy figurines from the river include two Cupids (FAPJW-D8ABE4 and NCL-2C40A4) and an eagle (BM-B0E251); pipeclay examples include BM-3E45C9, NCL-14F6E7 and NCL-8C8C21. Worrell, S. and Pearce, J., ‘Roman Britain in 2012. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 44 (2013), 349–50, no. 2Google Scholar; P.J. Walton, ‘What lies beneath? Interpreting the Romano-British assemblage from the river Tees at Piercebridge, County Durham’, in J. Lundock and M. Sivilich (eds), Aspects of Roman Water (in press).

¹⁶ Found by R. Booth. Identified and recorded by R. Griffiths and S. Worrell.

¹⁷ I.M. Stead, British Iron Age Swords and Scabbards (2006), 68, 196; Yorkshire Museums Acc. no. YORYM: 1948.938. M. Giles, A Forged Glamour: Landscape, Identity and Material Culture in the Iron Age (2012), 240–1.

¹⁸ Found by N. Goodlass. Identified and recorded by R. Griffiths.

¹⁹ E.M. Jope, Early Celtic Art in the British Isles (2000), 108–10; see also Lusby with Wimceby, Lincs. (LIN-40CE20), Worrell, op. cit. (note 14, 2010), 420, no. 5; Newport, Isle of Wight (IOW-341935), Worrell, S. and Pearce, J., ‘Roman Britain in 2013. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 45 (2014), 426, no. 27Google Scholar.

²⁰ Found by P. Schmidt. Identified and recorded by M. Foreman and M. Henig.

²¹ Durham, op. cit. (note 13), 3.35.14. Such images have been reviewed in a recently completed doctoral thesis: M. Feider, Chickens in the Archaeological Material Culture of Roman Britain, France, and Belgium, Bournemouth University (2017). We thank Hella Eckardt for a reference to this thesis.

²² Driffield, E Yorks., YORYM-1D2042 (22.5 g); Haslingfield, Cambs., CAM-3C3F35 (27 g); Bramford, Suffolk, SF2736; Branston and Mere, Lincs., LIN-6056C8; Shouldham, Norfolk, Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2003. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 35 (2004), 326–7, fig. 7Google Scholar.

²³ Found by G. Beckfoot. Identified and recorded by D. Boughton and M. Henig.

²⁴ Birley, B. and Greene, E., The Roman Jewellery from Vindolanda. Beads, Intaglios, Finger Rings, Bracelets and Earrings, Research Report NS IV Fascicule V (2006), 123–4, fig. 3.3, SF300Google Scholar.

²⁵ Sas, K. and Thoen, H., Schone Schijn/Brillance et prestige (2002), 145, no. 18Google Scholar.

²⁶ Found by G. Wigham. Identified and recorded by L. Prosser and J. Pearce.

²⁷ S. James, Excavations at Dura-Europos 1928–1937. Final Report VII. The Arms and Armour and other Military Equipment (2004), 171–3, esp. nos 592–4.

²⁸ ibid., 160; Bishop, M. and Coulston, J., Roman Military Equipment (2nd edn, 2006), 91–4, 137–8, 179–81, 216–18Google Scholar; J. Nikolay, Armed Batavians. Use and Significance of Weaponry and Horse Gear from Non-military Contexts in the Rhine Delta (2007), 22–4.

²⁹ Buckland, P., ‘A first-century shield from Doncaster, Yorkshire’, Britannia 9 (1978), 247–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁰ ibid., 263–4. A.R. Birley, ‘The complexity of intramural and extramural relationships on the northern frontier of Roman Britain – a Vindolanda case study’, in S. Hoss and A. Whitmore (eds), Small Finds and Ancient Social Practices in the Northwest Provinces of the Roman Empire (2016), 154–5.

³¹ D. Breeze, The Crosby Garrett Helmet, Cumberland and Westmorland Archaeological and Antiquarian Society Extra Series no. 48 (2018). A study of military equipment from non-military contexts in Britain is currently in progress as a doctoral thesis by Edwin Wood, King's College London.

³² Nikolay, op. cit. (note 28), 67, n. 4.

³³ Found by M. Quillian. Identified and recorded by B. Jones and S. Worrell.

³⁴ Faider-Feytmans, op. cit. (note 13), 129, no. 227, pl. 94; Durham, op. cit. (note 13), 3.35.17, for other sphinx figurines from Britain.

³⁵ Found by C. Maudsley. Identified and recorded by P. Reavill and J. Pearce. We are grateful to Peter Reavill for a further reference to the unpublished Wroxeter disc and to Rasa Banytė-Rowell (Lithuanian Institute of History), Edwin Wood and Michel Feugère for discussion and references.

³⁶ e.g. Jackson, R. and Burleigh, G., Dea Senuna: Treasure, Cult and Ritual at Ashwell, Hertfordshire, British Museum Research Publication 194 (2018)Google Scholar.

³⁷ Anderson, C., ‘Note: an Oxfordshire millefiori disc’, Oxoniensia 72 (2007), 219–20Google Scholar; Oxfordshire Museums Service Acc. no. OXCMS: 2006.123.

³⁸ They were sold along with three further mounts from the same set of fittings by the Royal Athena Galleries, New York, from the collection assembled by B.H.S., St. Petersburg, Florida. The further three mounts comprised an additional circular example, with a similar decoration as well as a projecting copper-alloy element at its centre, and two sub-rectangular plates (60 mm wide). The latter were formed by a central circular panel framed between rectangular panels with curving sides. On the circular panel a ring of blue enamel, inlaid with chequerboards, surrounded a central chequerboard circle resembling those on the circular mounts. The sub-rectangular panels were inlaid with white enamel, studded with rosettes of the same form as those on the circular mounts. Mr Rick Novakovich, associate director at the New York gallery, kindly supplied further information on the objects and their collection history. An enamelled belt plate of similar form was also documented at York, Cool, H.E.M., Lloyd-Morgan, G. and Hooley, A.D., Finds from the Fortress, The Archaeology of York The Small Finds 17/10 (1995), 1534–5, 1663, no. 6305Google Scholar. See also M. Feugère, Y. Bourrieau, Y. Roca and A. Giraudo, ‘Applique de harnais émaillée (Artefacts : APH-4015)’, no. 15, http://artefacts.mom.fr/result.php?id=APH-4015 (accessed 12/05/2019).

³⁹ R. Banytė-Rowell, ‘Cultural interactions during the Roman period’, in A. Bliujienė (ed.), Klaipėdos (Memel) kraštas: nuo ištakų iki XVII amžiaus / The Klaipėda (Memel) Region: from Origins to the 17th Century (2018), 139; P. Pentz, ‘Könige der Nordsee, 250–850 n. Chr.’, in E. Kramer, I. Stoumann and A. Greg (eds), Könige der Nordsee, 250-850 n. Chr. (2000), 13. Victoria and Albert Museum, Acc. no. 4098-1857, 43 mm diameter.

⁴⁰ Ludford, Worrell and Pearce, op. cit. (note 19, 2014), 410–11, no. 11; Glanton: Worrell, S. and Pearce, J., ‘Roman Britain in 2011. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 43 (2012), 361–2, no. 4Google Scholar. Fragments bearing chequerboard motifs from Claverdon, Warwicks. (WAW-D50D57), and Wighill, N Yorks. (SWYOR-0F6696), may derive from similar mounts. A further example from the Wroxeter area is currently being documented (P. Reavill, pers. comm.).

⁴¹ Butcher, S.A., ‘Stud’, in Draper, J., Excavations at Hill Farm, Gestingthorpe, Essex, East Anglia Archaeology Report 25 (1985), 27–9, fig. 8Google Scholar. Anderson, op. cit. (note 37), for references to the Usk and Chepstow examples.

⁴² Artefacts APH-4014 and APH-4015, smaller and larger examples. M. Feugère and A. Gilles, ‘Applique de harnais émaillée (Artefacts: APH-4014)’, http://artefacts.mom.fr/result.php?id=APH-4014 (accessed 12/05/2019); Feugère et al., op. cit. (note 38), APH-4015.

⁴³ Butcher, op. cit. (note 41), 29. Their proposed use as harness fittings is seen in the reconstruction image of a Roman cavalryman and horse as a cover image for the publication of small finds from the legionary fortress at York: Cool et al., op. cit. (note 38).

⁴⁴ Pentz, op. cit. (note 39), 154. Banytė-Rowell, op. cit. (note 39), 139; eadem, ‘Enamel disc from Aukštakiemis (Oberhof)’, Archaeologia Baltica 5 (2002), 123–30Google Scholar.

⁴⁵ Cool et al., op. cit. (note 38), 1534–5.

⁴⁶ Butcher, op. cit. (note 41), 29.

⁴⁷ Further examples from Germany and France are documented on the Artefacts website (APH-4015), Feugère et al. op. cit. (note 38).

⁴⁸ Worrell, S. and Pearce, J., ‘Roman Britain in 2007. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 46 (2015), 363–5, no. 7Google Scholar; Artefacts (FIB-4276) http://artefacts.mom.fr/en/home.php?id=FIB4276.

⁴⁹ Found by A. Jones. Identified and recorded by S. Burford and J. Pearce.

⁵⁰ Bishopsbourne, Kent, KENT-4D347B; Ropley, Hants., HAMP D46597; Sevenoaks, Kent, LON B47821; Monkton, Kent, LON-84D457; Lessingham, Norfolk, NMS-80E1B5.

⁵¹ Smith, R.A., ‘A hoard of metal found at Santon Downham, Suffolk’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 13.2 (1909), 160, fig. 11Google Scholar.

⁵² Faider-Feytmans, op. cit. (note 13), 168, no. 339, pl. 127; 181, no. 372, pl. 149; H.-J. Eggers, Der römische Import im freien Germanien (1951), 174, Typen 154-5, Taf. 12, Karte 44.

⁵³ Lundock, J., A Study of the Deposition and Distribution of Copper-Alloy Vessels in Roman Britain, Archaeopress Roman Archaeology 9 (2015), 110–12Google Scholar; J. Pearce, ‘A “civilised” death? The interpretation of provincial Roman grave good assemblages’, in J. Rasmus Brandt, H. Roland and M. Prusac (eds), Death and Changing Rituals. Function and Meaning in Ancient Funerary Practices (2015), 223–48.

⁵⁴ T. Allen, M. Donnelly, A. Hardy, C. Hayden and K. Powell, A Road Through the Past: Archaeological Discoveries on the A2 Pepperhill to Cobham Road-Scheme in Kent (2012), 335–40, 363–6; S. West, Life and Death on a Romano-British Estate. Turnershall Farm in Hertfordshire (2004), http://www.wheathampsteadheritage.org.uk/history-society-sources.asp (accessed 05/04/18).

⁵⁵ Found by A. Jones. Identified and recorded by S. Burford and J. Pearce.

⁵⁶ Lundock, op. cit. (note 53), 110–13, ‘handled pan 2’.

⁵⁷ Worrell, op. cit. (note 14, 2006), 460–2.

⁵⁸ W. Manning, J. Price and P.V. Webster, Report on the Excavations at Usk 1965–1976. The Roman Small Finds (1995), 194–6, fig. 52.

⁵⁹ M. Feugère, ‘Patère (Artefacts : PAT-4014)’, http://artefacts.mom.fr/result.php?id=PAT-4014 (accessed 09/04/2019). Izernore, BM Acc. No. 1851, 0813.36; Eggers, op. cit. (note 52), 173, Typ 147, Taf. 7.

⁶⁰ S. Tassinari, La vaisselle de bronze, romaine et provinciale, au Musée des Antiquités Nationales (1975), 32–3, no. 20, pl. VI.

⁶¹ Found by D. Clarke. Identified and recorded by E. Cox, J. Pearce and S. Worrell. We thank M. Henig and A. Parker for discussing this object and A. Whitmore for making available recent publications.

⁶² cf. A Whitmore, ‘Fascinating fascina: apotropaic magic and how to wear a penis’, in M. Cifarelli and L. Gawlinski (eds), What Shall I Say of Clothes? Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Study of Dress in Antiquity (2017), 47–66.

⁶³ A. Whitmore, ‘Phallic magic: a cross cultural approach to Roman phallic small finds’, in A. Parker and S. Mckie (eds), Material Approaches to Roman Magic: Occult Objects and Supernatural Substances (2018), 17–31.

⁶⁴ J. Plouviez, ‘Whose good luck? Roman phallic ornaments from Suffolk’, in N. Crummy (ed.), Image, Craft, and the Classical World (2005), 157–64; Worrell and Pearce, op. cit. (note 19, 2012), 391–2.

⁶⁵ Longford, Worrell, op. cit. (note 1, 2007), 310–11, no. 6; J.R. Clarke, Looking at Laughter. Humor, Power, and Transgression in Roman Visual Culture, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250 (2007), 69–70. Winged phalluses, Great Bardfield, Essex (ESS-D3F2A3, copper-alloy); Wetheringsett cum Brockford, Suffolk (SF-EE7435, bone).

⁶⁶ MOLA, Archaeology at Bloomberg (2017), 13 (https://www.londonmithraeum.com/about/); Deighton, Kirk, Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2008. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 40 (2009), 291–2, no. 8Google Scholar.

⁶⁷ Martin Henig (pers. comm.) notes the prophetic power attributed to crows, for example concerning the duration of the reign of Domitian (Suetonius, Dom. 23.2).

⁶⁸ Found by M. O'Driscoll. Identified and recorded by J. Shoemark.

⁶⁹ Worrell, op. cit. (note 14, 2006), 460–2, nos 30–1.

⁷⁰ Crummy, P., Benfield, S., Crummy, N., Rigby, V. and Shimmin, D., Stanway. An Elite Burial Site at Camulodunum, Britannia Monograph 24 (2007), 222–3, fig. 113Google Scholar.

⁷¹ Kennett, D.H., ‘Felmersham fish-head spout, a suggested reconstruction’, Antiquaries Journal 50 (1970), 86–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷² Crummy et al., op. cit. (note 70), 323–6; Sealey, P.R., ‘Finds from the cauldron pit’, in Brown, N.R. (ed.), The Archaeology of Ardleigh, Essex, East Anglian Archaeology Reports 90 (1999), 117–24Google Scholar.

⁷³ Found by N. Harrison. Identified and recorded by S. Ashley.

⁷⁴ Jackson, R., Cosmetic Sets of Late Iron Age and Roman Britain, British Museum Research Report 181 (2010), 6Google Scholar.

⁷⁵ Worrell, S., ‘Roman Britain in 2007. II. Finds reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme’, Britannia 39 (2008), 362–3, no. 12Google Scholar.

⁷⁶ Jackson, op. cit., (note 74), 47, fig. 24, nos 42, 433, 502.

⁷⁷ Jackson, op. cit., (note 74), 60–1.

⁷⁸ Found by N. Reynolds. Identified and recorded by R. Trevaskus.

⁷⁹ In the care and detail of execution it is comparable to other provincial examples, for example the key handle from Vionnaz (Valais) in the form of a leopard with animal prey, with similar ring-and-dot motif, described as the most accomplished of a group of similar bronzes from Switzerland, Leibundgut, op. cit. (note 13), 126–7, no. 166, Taf. 156–7.

⁸⁰ Identified and recorded by A. Byard and M. Henig.

⁸¹ Durham, op. cit. (note 13), 2.2.3; Pearce and Worrell, op. cit. (note 7, 2018), 404, 420, with references.

⁸² Fleischer, op. cit. (note 13), 21, 21a, 22.

⁸³ Faider-Feytmans, op. cit. (note 13), 81; Fleischer, op. cit. (note 13), 41–2, no. 23, Taf. 20; A. Leibundgut, Die römischen Bronzen der Schweiz II. Avenches (1976), 42–3, no. 23, Taf. 27; A. Kaufmann-Heinimann, Die römischen Bronzen der Schweiz 1. Augst und das Gebiet der Colonia Augusta Raurica (1977), 62–4, nos 59–62, Taf. 59–63.

⁸⁴ Kaufmann-Heinimann, op. cit. (note 83), 64–5, nos 63–4, Taf. 64–6.

⁸⁵ Found by W. Thompson. Identified and recorded by W. Thompson and M. Henig.

⁸⁶ Coombe, P., Pearce, J. and Libby, K., ‘A fragment of a monumental bronze statue, Lincoln’, Britannia 50 (2019)Google Scholar, doi:10.1017/S0068113X19000060; a finger from a gilded statue of life size or greater, Trudoxhill, Somerset (SOM-F5D182). For fragmentation, Croxford, B., ‘Iconoclasm in Roman Britain?’, Britannia 34 (2003), 81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁸⁷ Found by J. Higginbotham. Recorded and identified by E. Wood and J. Pearce. The mirror is considered more fully with other lead-framed mirrors by J. Pearce, E. Wood and S. Worrell, ‘New Roman lead-framed mirrors from the Portable Antiquities Scheme’ (in prep.).

⁸⁸ Other examples include a fragment of a square frame, from north Bedfordshire (BH-584656), with a maker's inscription in Greek, reported by Tomlin, Roger, ‘Roman Britain in 2018. III. Inscriptions’, Britannia 50 (2019), No. 3Google Scholar, Pearce et al., op. cit. (note 87); a rectangular frame from Therfield, Herts. (BH-589321); a circular frame from Westhorpe, Suffolk (SF-109D27). For further British finds see G. Lloyd-Morgan, The Typology and Chronology of Roman Mirrors in Italy and the North-Western Provinces, with Special Reference to the Collections in the Netherlands, PhD thesis, University of Birmingham (1977), 360–6.

⁸⁹ G. Lloyd Morgan, The Mirrors: Including a Description of the Roman Mirrors Found in the Netherlands, in Other Dutch Museums (1981), 104–6.

⁹⁰ M. Feugère, ‘Miroir en verre, cadre en plomb (Artefacts : MRR-4037)’, http://artefacts.mom.fr/result.php?id=MRR-4037 (accessed 08/02/2019).

⁹¹ Tudor, G., ‘Miroirs byzantins de verre doublé de plomb trouvés en Roumanie’, Dacia 11–12 (1948), 243–55Google Scholar.

⁹² Pearce et al., op. cit. (note 87); Gerrard, J., ‘New light on the end of Roman London’, The Archaeological Journal 168 (2011), 181–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹³ G. Baratta, ‘Note su un singolare instrumentum inscriptum: gli specchietti votiviin piombo’, in G. Baratta and S.M. Marengo (eds), Instrumenta inscripta III. Manufatti iscritti e vita dei santuari in età romana (2012), 266.

⁹⁴ R. Hingley, Londinium. A Biography (2018), 85.

⁹⁵ Found by P. Connolly. Identified and recorded by S. Wyatt and M. Marshall. The figure is published with extensive discussion by Marshall, M., ‘An anthropomorphic clasp-knife handle from the Thames foreshore at London’, Lucerna 55 (2018), 5–7Google Scholar.

⁹⁶ Marshall (ibid.) suggests that this groove might have accommodated some other implement, not otherwise documented for knives of this type but characteristic of some other Roman folding utensils.

⁹⁷ Fries, A., ‘Figürliche Klappmessergriffe aus Bein im Rheinischen Landesmuseum Trier’, Funde und Ausgrabungen im Bezirk Trier 40 (2008), 24–36Google Scholar; S.J. Greep, Objects of Animal Bone, Antler, Ivory and Teeth from Roman Britain, unpublished PhD thesis, Cardiff University (1983), type C3, for figural knife handles from Britain in bone, antler and ivory.

⁹⁸ K. Dunbabin, Theater and Spectacle in the Art of the Roman Empire (2016), 222–6.

⁹⁹ Crummy, N., ‘The small finds’, in Fulford, M. and Clarke, A., Silchester: City in Transition. The Mid-Roman Occupation of Insula IX c A.D. 125–250/300, Britannia Monograph 25 (2011), 110–13Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁰ Found by A. Suttie. Identified and recorded by S. Wyatt.

¹⁰¹ J.W. Hayes, Late Roman Pottery (1972), 311–12.

¹⁰² D. Bailey, A Catalogue of the Lamps in the British Museum. 3. Roman Provincial Lamps (1988), 66–8; Bubić, V., ‘Late antique oil-lamps with early Christian images from the Archaeological Museum in Split’, Vjesnik za arheologiju i povijest dalmatinsku 104(1) (2011), 236, 271, no. 59Google Scholar, with references to other examples from Mediterranean contexts.

¹⁰³ H. Eckardt, Illuminating Roman Britain (2002), 52–5, 220–2.

¹⁰⁴ See No. 17 above.

¹⁰⁵ Found by M. Longman. Identified and recorded by J. Ahmet.

¹⁰⁶ Allen et al., op. cit. (note 54), 342–3, 367–8.

¹⁰⁷ Tassinari, S., ‘Au Musée du Louvre, des vases en bronze romains en quête d'origine’, Bulletin Archéologique 38 (2018), 42Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁸ Found by R. Piper. Identified by J. Ahmet. We are indebted to Barry Ager for his comments on this object and his notes on parallels and further Quoit Brooch style objects documented by the PAS.

¹⁰⁹ S. Suzuki, The Quoit Brooch Style and Anglo-Saxon Settlement: A Casting and Recasting of Cultural Identity Symbols (2000).

¹¹⁰ Worrell and Pearce, op. cit. (note 64, 2012), 388–90, for late Roman buckles documented by the PAS.

¹¹¹ Suzuki, op. cit. (note 109), 130–1, pl. 7; Gurney, D., ‘Archaeological finds in Norfolk 2000’, Norfolk Archaeology 43.4 (2001), 700 (fig. 3b)Google Scholar; B. Ager, ‘Quoit Brooch style pendant’, in Scull, C., ‘Excavation and survey at Watchfield, Oxfordshire, 1983–92’, Archaeological Journal 149 (1992), 243–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹² Inker, P., ‘Technology as active material culture: the Quoit-Brooch style’, Medieval Archaeology 44.1 (2000), 43–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Saint-Marcel, B.M. Ager, ‘A note on the objects decorated in the Quoit Brooch style from the burials at Saint-Marcel’, in Le Boulanger, F. and Simon, L., ‘De la ferme antique à la nécropole de l'Antiquité tardive. Étude archéologique du site de Saint-Marcel ‘le Bourg’ (Morbihan)’, Gallia 69.1 (2012), 240–2Google Scholar.

¹¹³ Barry Ager (pers. comm.) notes that there are now at least five Quoit Brooch style objects documented on the PAS database. The other examples comprise a scabbard mount from Cheriton, Hants. (SUR-029B13), a bracelet from near Sittingbourne, Kent (KENT-06B559), a strap-end from Horton Kirby and South Darenth, Kent (KENT-EED003), and a buckle from the Isle of Wight (IOW-0CB093). A strap-end from near Rodmell, Sussex, is a likely further example (SUSS-C03C01).

¹¹⁴ Ager, op. cit. (note 112), 242.

¹¹⁵ Found by J. Adams. Identified and recorded by C. Hayward Trevarthen.

¹¹⁶ J. Bayley and S. Butcher, Roman Brooches in Britain: A Technological and Typological Study based on the Richborough Collection (2004), 177–8. E. Riha, Die römischen Fibeln aus Augst und Kaiseraugst, FiA 18 (1994), 161–2, typ 7.14, esp. type 4, dated to the second and third centuries a.d.

¹¹⁷ Worrell and Pearce, op. cit. (note 15, 2013), 379–80, no. 33. Other examples: an unprovenanced umbonate brooch and other disc brooches, M. Feugère, Les fibules en Gaule méridionale, de la conquête à la fin du Ve siècle ap. J.-C. (1985), 368–9, type 27c; M. Tache, Fibules antiques celtiques, romaines, mérovingiennes (2015), no. 800, planche 89.

¹¹⁸ Found by S. Mills. Identified and recorded by L. Burnett and M. Henig, with parallels noted by R. Webley.

¹¹⁹ Brown, P.D.C., ‘Two Romano-British bronze terminals in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford’, Antiquaries Journal 53 (1973), 264–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar, pl. XLVIII (Adderbury, Cockfield); Field, N.H., ‘A Romano-British bronze terminal from North Tarrant Hinton Down, Dorset’, Antiquaries Journal 50 (1970), 337–8 (Tarrant Hinton)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹²⁰ Durham, op. cit. (note 13), 3.22, for instance in examples from Bassingbourn (Cambs.) and Cirencester.

¹²¹ Worrell, op. cit. (note 66, 2009), 293–4, no. 11.

¹²² Found by F. Campbell. Identified and recorded by L. Burnett.

¹²³ Stead, I.M., ‘The reconstruction of Iron Age buckets from Aylesford and Baldock’, The British Museum Quarterly 35 (1971), 250–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jope, op. cit. (note 19), pl. 144a–f.

¹²⁴ Pearce and Worrell, op. cit. (note 2, 2017), 453–4, no. 23.

¹²⁵ C. Boube-Picot, Les bronzes antiques du Maroc. I. La statuaire (1969), 95–7, planches 16–17, 19–20, 26, 28–9; Piggott, S., ‘An ancient Briton in N. Africa’, Antiquity 42 (1968), 128–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.