Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:31:21.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unusual Buildings at Wood Lane End, Hemel Hempstead, Herts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

David S. Neal
Affiliation:
Department of the Environment, Fortress House, 23 Savile Row, London WIX IAB

Abstract

The Roman site at Wood Lane End is situated on the east side of Hemel Hempstead (TL 082079) adjacent to the Industrial Estate and close to the MI intersection (FIG. I). It occupies the plateau on a 450 ft. contour about midway between the rivers Ver and Gade. Close by the land dips in a south-easterly direction to form the start of a shallow valley running across the Gorhambury estate towards Verulamium three miles away. The site is equidistant ( miles) between the Roman villas at Gorhambury outside Verulamium and Gadebridge situated alongside the Gade stream just to the north of Hemel Hempstead. The subsoil is of the Batcombe series—a pebbly loam over a bedrock of clay with flint. In places small pockets of gravel are encountered while occasionally fingers of chalk rise close to the surface. As elsewhere on the plateau the subsoil is surprisingly well drained, the drainage of the area being towards the Ver valley. The soil is suited to arable cultivation though its productive capacity is limited by the varying degrees of stoniness. The earliest cartographic evidence of the Wood Lane End area comes from the Tithe apportionment map of 1843 (DSA4/48). It would appear then that the site was located in a field called Hales Wood, but despite its name it was classified as arable, and was 7·021 acres in extent. None of the adjacent field names gives any indication of Roman or earlier features and neither do the boundaries of the 1843 map reflect the alignment of the Roman buildings. They relate solely to the roads, as shown on the nineteenth-century map.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 14 , November 1983 , pp. 73 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © David S. Neal 1983. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Neal, D. S., Excavations at Gorhambury finalized in 1982, H.M.S.O. Report scheduled for 19841985.Google Scholar

2 Neal, D. S., The Excavation of the Roman Villa in Gadebridge Park, Hemel Hempstead 1963–68. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, No. XXXI (1974).Google Scholar

3 Anthony, I., Hertfordshire Past and Present i (1960), 29, fig. 8.Google Scholar

4 The Viatores, Roman Roads in the South-East Midlands (1964), 155.

5 Ibid., 35.

6 Potter, T. W. and Jackson, R. P. J., Antiquity lvi, No. 217 (July 1982), 111–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Fox, G. E. and Hope, W. H. St. John, Archaeologia liii, pt. 2 (1892), 564.Google Scholar

8 Wheeler, R. E. M. and Wheeler, T. V., Verulamium: A Belgic and two Roman Cities. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, No. XI (1936), 122–3, Pl. xxxv; M. J. T. Lewis, Temples in Roman Britain (1966), 97.Google Scholar

9 op. cit. (note 2).

10 Neal, D. S., Herts. Arch. iv (1976), 1135.Google Scholar

12 op. cit. (note 1).

13 Anthony, I., Herts. Arch. i (1968) 950;Google ScholarFrere, S. S., Verulamium Excavations, I. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London No. XXVIII (1972).Google Scholar

14 Castle, S., Trans. London and Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxvii (1976), 206–27.Google Scholar

15 op. cit. (note 13); a revision of the Verulamium dating has since been completed and the date ranges cited here are based on S. S. Frere, Verulamium III (forthcoming).

16 A. Anderson, A Guide to Roman Fine Wares (1980), 14, fig. 7.1.

17 Suggett, P., Trans. London and Middlesex Arch. Soc. xvii pt. 2 (1953), 173–88, fig. 4.Google Scholar

18 Corder, P., Antiq. Journ. xxi (1941), 282, fig. 4.Google Scholar