Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:05:41.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Longevity in the 21st Century/The Cohort Effect: Insights and Explanations. Abstract of the Discussion held by the Faculty of Actuaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , 01 October 2004 , pp. 878 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.L. & Whitehead, D. (1960). The trend of mortality rates in seventeen countries in the last twenty years. Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries, 2, 379–400.Google Scholar
Giles, P. & Wilkie, A.D. (1973). Recent mortality trends: some international comparisons. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 33, 375–514.Google Scholar
Gwilt, R.L. (1956). Mortality in the last hundred years. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 24, 40–176.Google Scholar
Macdonald, A.S., Cairns, A.J.G., Gwilt, P.L. & Miller, K.A. (1998). An international comparison of recent trends in population mortality. British Actuarial Journal, 4, 3–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, A.T. & Kirton, R.J. (1953). The financial structure of a life office. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 21, 141–218.Google Scholar
Redington, F.M. (1952). A review of the principles of life office valuations. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 78, 286–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar