Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:17:52.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Simples are by Compounds Farre Exceld’: Southwell’s Longer Latin Poems and ‘St Peters Complaint’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

Extract

It is understandable that study of Southwell’s life should have had priority over the study of his poetry. This biographical bias is evident in the gaps and weaknesses of existing accounts of his poetry: shortcomings which, I would argue, are regrettable because his poetry could provide a better commentary on his life than the conventional assumptions of hagiography. His Latin poetry, which forms a substantial portion of his poetic output, has been overlooked both in Leicester Bradner’s history of Anglo-Latin poetry, and the more recent upsurge in Neo-Latin studies. A different kind of ignorance surrounds his English poetry. In his poetic masterpiece, ‘Saint Peters Complaint’, Southwell describes Christ’s glance as ‘In cyphred words, his misteries disclosing’. (The words are cyphered because they are zeroes, circles projected from Christ’s eyes. They are also cyphered in being encoded in an image.) The description may be aptly applied to the poem which also consists of ‘cyphered words’. The poem’s code is not difficult to penetrate, but nevertheless this essay represents the first attempt to give an account of the ‘high mysteries’ that it at once conceals and discloses; that is, to elucidate the cryptic aspect of the poem. This gap in the secondary literature exemplifies a more general charge that can be levelled against writers on Southwell: that they have tended to deprecate the mannerism or artifice of his work as somehow detracting from his sanctity, Typically, they present it as an external trapping or disguise which must be discarded in order to reveal the true, natural Southwell. I would maintain, however, that artifice is central to Southwell’s poetry, his conception of religion, and his life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Catholic Record Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 ‘Poemata Latina’, in The Complete Poems of Robert Southwell, S.J., edited by the Rev. A. B. Grosart, Blackburn, 1872), pp. 189–215, Leicester Bradner, Musae Anglicanae: A History of Anglo-Latin Poetry 1500–1925 (London, 1940). For a useful guide to modern Neo-Latin scholarship, see Jozef, IJsewijn, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar.

2 Nancy, Brown and McDonald, J. H., The Poems of Robert Southwell, SJ. (London, 1967)Google Scholar.

3 ‘De Assumptione B.M.V.’, 11.6–7; ‘Of the Blessed Sacrament of the Aulter’ 1.87; ‘Praesentatio B. Virginis’, 1.1: ‘Saint Peters Complaint’, 1.420; ‘Of the Blessed Sacrament of the Aulter’, 1.88.

4 Ernst, Curtius, European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages (London, 1953), p. 274.Google Scholar

5 For an extensive study of ‘central accent’—the emphasising of the central point or passage of a poem—see Alistair, Fowler, Triumphal Forms (Cambridge, 1970)Google Scholar.

6 As I have argued in a previous essay: ‘The Relation between Robert Southwell’s Neo-Latin and English Poetry’, Recusant History 17/3, p. 207n.

7 Grosart has ‘Quem timeo…’. I have corrected this error (or presumptuous emendation) and restored the punctuation found in the sole source for the Latin poetry, MS.A.V.5. held at Stonyhurst College.

8 Fowler, pp. 112–124.

9 Louis, Martz, The Poetry of Meditation, second edition (New Haven, 1962), p. 186.Google Scholar