Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:34:21.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recreating Herschel's actinometry: An essay in the historiography of experimental practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2008

ADELHEID VOSKUHL
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, now Department of Physics, University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany

Abstract

... and signs and the signs of signs are used only when we are lacking things.

Brother William of Baskerville in The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco

Recreating, as part of doing history, can be a way of reflecting what creating is as part of science. Discussions revolving around historical understanding of the scientific enterprise have recently included strong commitments to turn scientific practice into one of the main objectives of historical study. One specific methodological approach to face up to this assignment is integrating the reconstruction and reperformance of past experiments into the historical analysis of the doing-part in science. This paper deals with the doing-part in history, that is, with the historiographical consequences that might stem from this reconstruction and reperformance of past experimentation. In the course of a four-month period of research I worked with a replica of the so-called ‘actinometer’, an instrument to measure the intensity of solar radiation, which was invented by John Herschel in 1824. On the basis of this example, I try to trace how recent performances of experimental activities can contribute to historical understanding of human agency in scientific practice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)