Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:45:12.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Royal Society, natural history and the peoples of the ‘New World(s)’, 1660–1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

JOHN GASCOIGNE
JOHN GASCOIGNE
Affiliation:
School of History and Philosophy, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: j.gascoigne@unsw.edu.au.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the response of the Royal Society to the increasing contact with parts of the globe beyond Europe. Such contact was in accord with the programme of Baconian natural history that the early Royal Society espoused, but it also raised basic questions about the extent and nature of the pursuit of natural history. In particular, the paper is concerned with the attention paid to one particular branch of natural history, the study of other peoples and their customs. Such scrutiny of other peoples in distant lands raised basic questions about what methods natural history should employ and the extent to which it could serve as a foundation for more general and theoretical claims. By taking a wide sweep from the beginnings of the Royal Society until the end of the eighteenth century it is hoped light will be shed on the changing understanding of natural history over this period.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 539 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 H. Lyons, The Royal Society 1660–1940: A History of Its Administration under Its Charters, Cambridge, 1944, 28.

2 P. H. Smith and P. Findlen, ‘Commerce and the representation of nature in art and science’, in Merchants and Marvels: Commerce, Science and Art in Early Modern Europe (ed. P. H. Smith and P. Findlen), New York, 2002, 1–25, 18; and idem, ‘Local herbs, global medicines: commerce, knowledge, and commodities in Spanish America’, in ibid., 163–81, 165.

3 H. J. Cook, Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age, New Haven, 2007, 46.

4 G. Rees (ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon, Vol. VI: Philosophical Studies c.1611–c.1619, Oxford, 1996, 99.

5 B. Shapiro, ‘History and natural history in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England: an essay on the relationship between humanism and science’, in English Scientific Virtuosi in the 16th and 17th Centuries (ed. B. Shapiro and R. Frank), Los Angeles, 1979, 1–55, 7, 18.

6 J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis and D. D. Heath (eds), The Works of Francis Bacon, 14 vols., London, 1857–74, v, 152; G. Rees (ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon, Vol. XI: The Instauratio Magna, Part II, Novum Organum and Associated Texts, Oxford, 2004, 321.

7 Spedding, Ellis and Heath, op. cit. (6), ii, 348.

8 M. Kiernan (ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon, Vol. IV: The Advancement of Learning, Oxford, 2000, 70, 71.

9 R. Drayton, ‘Knowledge and empire’, in The Oxford History of the British Empire, Vol. II: The Eighteenth Century (ed. P. Marshall), Oxford, 1998, 231–52, 233.

10 Rees, op. cit. (6), 479, 481.

11 Carey, D. ‘Compiling nature's history: travellers and travel narratives in the early Royal Society’, Annals of Science (1997), 54, 269–92, 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the background to this document see Hunter, M., ‘Robert Boyle and the early Royal Society: a reciprocal exchange in the making of Baconian science’, BJHS (2007), 40, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Boyle, R., ‘General heads …’, Philosophical Transactions (1665–6), 1, 186–9, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Carey, D., ‘Locke, travel literature, and the natural history of man’, Seventeenth Century (1986), 7, 259–80.Google Scholar

14 Carey, op. cit. (13), 269.

15 C. Withers, Geography, Science and Natural Identity: Scotland since 1520, Cambridge, 2001, 37–9.

16 S. Mendyk, ‘Speculum Britanniae’: Regional Study, Antiquarianism, and Science in Britain to 1700, Toronto, 1989, 165.

17 R. Knox, Historical Relation of the Island Ceylon, in the East Indies …, London, 1681, p. [i].

18 D. Preston and M. Preston, A Pirate of Exquisite Mind: The Life of William Dampier, Explorer, Naturalist and Buccaneer, London, 2005, 325. On Woodward's work see Withers, C., ‘Geography, natural history and the eighteenth-century enlightenment: putting the world in place’, History Workshop Journal (1995), 39, 137–63, 144–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Royal Society Archives, EL/M2/34, summaries of several letters from Cotton Mather to John Woodward and to Richard Waller, 1712–. A Philosophical Transactions article based on this correspondence ((1714–16), 29, 62–71) includes material by Mather on American Indian ethnology.

20 Joseph Levine, Dr Woodward's Shield: History, Science and Satire in Augustan England, Berkeley, 1997, 99; see also 73 on the correspondence with Mather.

21 John Woodward, Brief Instructions …, London, 1698, 8–9.

22 [Review of] An Account …, Philosophical Transactions (1695–7), 19, 426–433, 428–9. Preston and Preston, op. cit. (18), 330, attribute this review to Hooke.

23 [Review of] An Account …, Philosophical Transactions (1694), 18, 166–8, 167.

24 Fryer, John, ‘An abstract …’, Philosophical Transactions (1698), 20, 338–48, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Rees, op. cit. (6), 451.

26 Oldenburg to Sorbière, 3 January 1663/4, in A. Rupert Hall and M. Boas Hall (eds.), The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols., Madison, WI and London, 1965–86, ii, 144.

27 Boyle to Oldenburg, 13 June 1666, in M. Hunter, A. Clericuzio and L. Principe (eds.), The Correspondence of Robert Boyle, 1636–1691, 6 vols., London, 1999–2000, iii, 171.

28 Carey, op. cit. (13), 259–80.

29 M. Boas Hall, Promoting Experimental Learning: Experiment and the Royal Society 1660–1727, Cambridge, 1991; and P. Anstey, ‘Experimental versus speculative natural philosophy’, in The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century: Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy (ed. P. Anstey and J. Schuster), Dordrecht, 2005, 215–42, 220.

30 da Costa, P. Fontes, ‘The making of extraordinary facts: authentication of singularities of nature at the Royal Society of London in the first half of the eighteenth century’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science (2002), 33, 265–88, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 For a recent affirmation of the importance of the Baconian programme in shaping the early Royal Society see W. T. Lynch, Solomon's Child: Method in the Early Royal Society of London, Stanford, 2001, which argues, at 233, that the ‘Royal Society was a Baconian institution’.

32 Anstey, P., ‘Locke, Bacon and natural history’, Early Science and Medicine (2002), 7, 65–92, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Wood, P. B., ‘Methodology and apologetics: Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society’, BJHS (1980), 13, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Boyle to Oldenburg, 13 June 1666, in Hunter, Clericuzio and Principe, op. cit. (27), iii, 174.

35 Oldenburg to Hill?, 30 August 1671, with enclosure for an unknown Jesuit in Brazil, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), viii, 236, 244.

36 Oldenburg to Hill?, op. cit. (35), 236.

37 ‘Extracts of Three Letters … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1668), 3, 791–6, 794.

38 Oldenburg to Hotham, 7 March 1669–70, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), vi, 535.

39 T. Birch, History of the Royal Society, 4 vols., London, 1756–7, iv, 165.

40 Royal Society Archives, RB/1/39/9 (Boyle Papers), fol. 49.

41 Dear, P., ‘Totius in verba: rhetoric and authority in the early Royal Society’, Isis> (1985), 76, 144–61.Google Scholar

42 S. Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago, 1994.

43 Dear, op. cit. (41), 156.

44 Fontes da Costa, op. cit. (30).

45 Carey, op. cit. (11), 286.

46 ‘Inquiries for Suratte … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1666–7), 2, 415–22, 419.

47 De Guattini, M. Angelo, ‘Observations of some animals …’, Philosophical Transactions (1677–8), 12, 977–8, 978.Google Scholar

48 T. Sprat, History of the Royal Society (ed. J. I. Cope and H. Whitmore Jones, St Louis, 1959), 158.

49 L. Daston, ‘Marvelous facts and miraculous evidence in early modern Europe’, in J. Chandler, A. I. Davidson and H. Harootunion, Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice and Persuasion across the Discipline, Chicago, 1994, 243–89, 261.

50 ‘Extracts of three letters … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1668), 3, 791–6, 795.

51 Clarke, C., ‘An account of the very tall men …’, Philosophical Transactions (1767), 57, 75–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The credibility of such claims about the existence of Patagonian giants was much discussed among naturalists, and Buffon devoted a section of his ‘Additions à l'article qui a pour titre, Variétés dans l'espèce humaine’ to the issue. He was sceptical about the existence of real giants, though he was willing to believe the sort of claim made by Clarke that some Patagonians were nine feet tall. G. Buffon Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière, Supplément, Vol. IV, Paris, 1777, 525.

52 Maxwell, J. and Harris, J., ‘An account of the Cape of Good Hope’, Philosophical Transactions (1706–7), 25, 2423–34, 2426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 McCauseland, R., ‘Particulars relative to the nature and customs of the Indians of North-America’, Philosophical Transactions (1786), 76, 229–35, 230.Google Scholar

54 Carey, op. cit. (11), 273.

55 ‘Directions for Sea-Men … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1665–6), 1, 140–3, 140–1.

56 Sprat, op. cit. (48), 86.

57 Illiffe, R., ‘Foreign bodies: travel, empire and the early Royal Society of London, Part II. “The land of experimental knowledge”’, Canadian Journal of History (1999), 34, 24–50, 40.Google Scholar

58 R. Stearns, Science in the British Colonies of America, Urbana, IL, 1970.

59 S. Parrish, American Curiosity: Cultures of Natural History in the Colonial British Atlantic World, Chapel Hill, 2006, 315.

60 Lyons, op. cit. (1), 28.

61 Oldenburg to Winthrop, 13 October 1667, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), iii, 525.

62 Winthrop to Oldenburg, 4 October 1669, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), vi, 255.

63 Oldenburg to Norwood, 24 October 1666, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), iii, 276.

64 M. Hunter, Science and Society in Restoration England, Cambridge, 1981, 36.

65 Birch, op. cit. (39), i, 457, 3 August 1664.

66 Oldenburg to Boyle, 13 March 1666; Boyle to Oldenburg, 19 March 1666, in Hunter, Clericuzio and Principe, op. cit. (27), iii, 109, 117.

67 L. de Bougainville, A Voyage Round the World. Performed by Order of the His Most Christian Majesty, in the Years 1766, 1767, 1768, and 1769 (tr. from the French by J. Reinhold Forster), London, 1772, p. viii.

68 Royal Society Archives, Misc MS3/20, East India Court of Directors to the Royal Society, 19 November 1778.

69 Ruggles, R. I., ‘Governor Samuel Wegg, intelligent layman of the Royal Society, 1753–1802’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society (1978), 32, 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 Stearns, op. cit. (58), 705, 707.

71 Birch, op. cit. (39), ii, 92.

72 J. McClelland, Science Reorganized: Scientific Societies in the Eighteenth Century, New York, 1985, 303–4.

73 Forster, J. Reinhold, ‘A Letter …’, Philosophical Transactions (1772), 62, 54–9, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74 Birch, op. cit. (39), ii, 314.

75 Reilly, C., ‘A catalogue of Jesuitica in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1665–1715’, Archivum Historicum Societatis Jesu (1958), 27, 339–62.Google Scholar

76 Sprat, op. cit. (48), 373.

77 P. Clain, Father Le Gobien, ‘An extract of two letters from the missionary Jesuits … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1708–9), 22, 189–99.

78 M. Hunter, ‘The cabinet institutionalised: the Royal Society's “Repository” and its background’, in The Origins of Museums: The Cabinet of Curiosities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Europe (ed. O. Impey and A. MacGregor), Oxford, 1985, 159–68, 159.

79 K. Arnold, Cabinets for the Curious: Looking back at Early English Museums, Aldershot, 2006, 2.

80 Arnold, op. cit. (79), 110.

81 N. Grew, Musaeum Regalis Societatis, or a Catalogue and Description of the Natural and Artificial Rarities Belonging to the Royal Society and Preserved at Gresham College …, London, 1694, 365–72, 56, 205, 222.

82 E. Hooper-Greenhill, Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge, London, 1992, 158.

83 Collett, D., ‘An empire of things – exotische Objekte in “Musaeum” der Royal Society’, WerkstattGeschichte (2006), 43, 5–21, 20.Google Scholar

84 Lyons, op. cit. (1), 49.

85 L. Jardine, ‘Paper monuments and learned societies: Hooke's Royal Society Repository’, in Enlightening the British: Knowledge, Discovery and the Museum in the Eighteenth Century (ed. R. G. W. Anderson et al.), London, 2004, 49–54, 50.

86 Miller, D., ‘“Into the valley of darkness”: reflections on the Royal Society in the eighteenth century’, History of Science (1989), 27, 155–66, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87 Oldenburg to Winthrop, 26 March 1670, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), vi, 594. Grew's catalogue, at 370, duly records ‘Several sorts of Indian Money, called Wampampeage’.

88 D. Stimson, Scientists and Amateurs: A History of the Royal Society, New York, 1968, 154.

89 Birch, op. cit. (39), ii, 495.

90 Birch, op. cit. (39), iv, 226–7.

91 Oldenburg to Hevelius, 13 June 1677, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), xiii, 299.

92 Birch, op. cit. (39), iv, 493.

93 Steele, J., ‘Account of a musical instrument …’, Philosophical Transactions (1775), 65, 67–71, 72–8.Google Scholar

94 J. Cope, ‘Some considerations … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1735–6), 131–5, 131.

95 Birch, op. cit. (39), iv, 504.

96 Philosophical Transactions (1666–7), 2, 415–22, 417, 420.

97 ‘An account of a sort of sugar … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1685), 15, 988; P. Dudley, ‘An account of the method of making sugar … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1720–1), 31, 27–8.

98 Birch, op. cit. (39), iv, 520.

99 Southwell, R., ‘The method the Indians in Virginia and Carolina use …’, Philosophical Transactions (1686), 16, 532–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

100 Forster, J. Reinhold, ‘A letter …’, Philosophical Transactions (1772), 62, 54–9, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

101 Papin, Father, ‘A letter … upon the mechanic arts and physick of the Indians’, Philosophical Transactions (1713), 28, 225–30, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

102 Sherard, W., ‘The way of making several China varnishes’, Philosophical Transactions (1700–1), 22, 525–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

103 Birch, op. cit. (39), iv, 520; Philosophical Transactions (1775), 65, 91–3, 93.

104 Cook, op. cit. (3), 414.

105 Birch, op. cit. (39), ii, 75.

106 Glover, T., ‘An account of Virginia …’, Philosophical Transactions (1676), 11, 623–36, 634, 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

107 J. Chaplin, Subject Matter: Technology, the Body, and Science on the Anglo-American Frontier, 1500–1676, Cambridge, MA, 2001, 197–8.

108 Sloane, H., ‘An Account …’, Philosophical Transactions (1698), 20, 390–2, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

109 Royal Society Archives, RBO/18/45, Doctor Mortimer's account of the … proposals for printing a geographical and historical account of China, Read 7 June 1733, fol. 278.

110 Stearns, op. cit. (58), 697.

111 ‘A narrative … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1674), 9, 197–208, 200.

112 Kiernan, op. cit. (8), 82.

113 Rees, op. cit. (4), 105.

114 Rees, op. cit. (6), 157.

115 Rees, op. cit. (6), 39.

116 Rees, op. cit. (6), 457.

117 M. Purver, The Royal Society: Concept and Creation, London, 1967, 35.

118 Oldenburg to Harpur, 22 May 1668, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), iv, 422.

119 Oldenburg to Sir John Finch, 10 April 1666, in Hall and Hall, op. cit. (26), iii, 86; Philosophical Transactions (1666), 1, 186.

120 Boyle to Oldenburg, 13 June 1666, in Hunter, Clericuzio and Principe, op. cit. (27), iii, 171.

121 P. Anstey and M. Hunter, ‘Robert Boyle's “Designe about natural history”’, Early Science and Medicine (2008), 13, 83–126, 107.

122 R. Sargent, ‘Learning from experience’, in Robert Boyle Reconsidered (ed. M. Hunter), Cambridge, 1994, 57–78, 58.

123 H. Kames, The Gentleman Farmer, 4th edn, Edinburgh, 1798, 1 (first published 1776).

124 W. Wales, ‘Journal of a voyage … ’, Philosophical Transactions, 1770, 100–36, 127.

125 See M. Feingold, ‘Mathematicians and naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal Society’, in Isaac Newton's Natural Philosophy (ed. J. Z. Buchwald and I. Bernard Cohen), Cambridge, MA, 2001, 77–102, 77.

126 Feingold, op. cit. (125), 97.

127 Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, Perceval Collection, MS 215, Charles Blagden to Joseph Banks (27 December 1783). On this conflict see J. Gascoigne, Joseph Banks and the English Enlightenment: Useful Knowledge and Polite Culture, Cambridge, 1994, 62–6; J. L. Heilbron, ‘A mathematicians' mutiny, with morals', in World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science (ed. Paul Horwich), Cambridge, MA, 1993, 81–129.

128 On the rising prestige of natural history in the late eighteenth century see Jones, W. P., ‘The vogue of natural history in England, 1750–1770’, Annals of Science (1937), 2, 345–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T. L. Hankins, Science and the Enlightenment, Cambridge, 1985, 169; Mendyk, op. cit. (16), 243.

129 Forster, J. Reinhold, ‘A letter …’, Philosophical Transactions (1772), 62, 58.Google Scholar

130 P. Wood, ‘The science of man’, in Cultures of Natural History (ed. N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary), Cambridge, 1996, 197–210.

131 Rusnock, A., ‘Correspondence networks and the Royal Society’, BJHS (1999), 32, 155–69, 157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

132 R. Bernasconi, Concepts of Race in the Eighteenth Century, Vol. I: Bernier, Linnaeus and Maupertuis, Bristol, 2001, pp. xi–xii.

133 ‘An extract of a letter of Mr. Lister's … ’, Philosophical Transactions (1675), 10, 399–400, 400.

134 Royal Society Archives, RB/1/39/10, ‘An Account of Virginia’, fol. 132.

135 Govier, M., ‘The Royal Society, slavery and the island of Jamaica: 1660–1700’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London (1999), 53, 203–17, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

136 Stearns, op. cit. (58), 545.

137 Mitchell, J., ‘An essay …’, Philosophical Transactions (1744–5), 43, 102–50, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

138 Bate, J., ‘An account …’, Philosophical Transactions (1759–60), 51, 175–8, 177–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

139 J. Gascoigne, ‘Blumenbach, Banks, and the beginnings of anthropology at Göttingen’, in Göttingen and the Development of the Natural Sciences (ed. N. Rupke), Göttingen, 2002, 86–98.

140 Berman, M., ‘“Hegemony” and the amateur tradition in British science’, Journal of Social History (1974–5), 8, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

141 J. Lyon, and P. R. Sloan, From Natural History to the History of Nature: Readings from Buffon and His Critics, Notre Dame, 1981, 121; P. Sloan, ‘Natural History, 1670–1802’, in Companion to the History of Science (ed. R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie and M. J. S. Hodge), London, 1996, 295–313; P. Sloan, ‘Natural History’, in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy (ed. K. Haakonssen), 2 vols., Cambridge, 2006, ii, 903–38.

142 P. Wood, ‘The science of man’, in Cultures of Natural History (ed. N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary), Cambridge, 1996, 197–210; D. Outram, ‘New spaces in natural history’, in ibid., 249–65; G. Stocking, ‘French anthropology in 1800’, in Race, Culture and Evolution (ed. G. Stocking), Chicago, 1982, 13–41; J. Gascoigne, ‘The Pacific and the German Enlightenment’, in The Anthropology of the Enlightenment (ed. L. Wolff and M. Cipolloni), Stanford, 2007, 141–71.