Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T06:04:07.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composing and performing in the key stage 3 classroom: a study using multi-trait, multi-method analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2013

Andrew Fowler
Andrew Fowler*
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Grammar School Penrith, Ullswater Road, Penrith CA11 7EG, UKAFowler@qegs.cumbria.sch.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Music is both a creative and a performing art’ (Hallam, 2006, p. 70). Many musicians and music educators maintain that composing and performing, although related, are essentially different aspects of musical activity. In the professional musical sphere, composition and performance are almost invariably separated; academic studies have treated them discretely; GCSE and ‘A’ level specifications assess them distinctly, and many music teachers assess them in the classroom as if they were separate disciplines. It is common practice for students in the lower secondary school in England to work in a more integrated way, however (Philpott, 2001; Major, 2008), composing, performing to the class, and appraising each others’ work. Recently produced assessment guidelines for secondary school music teachers in England (NAME, 2011) encourage this more integrated view, accepting the assumption made by Swanwick and Franca (1999, p. 12) that ‘musical understanding is a broad conceptual dimension’ by considering composing and performing as inter-linked ways of demonstrating and communicating musicality. This study sets out to investigate the links between composing and performing in the secondary school classroom, through peer-rating, teacher rating and students’ self-report attitudinal questionnaires, analysing these using a multi-trait, multi-method technique.

Evidence for convergent validity was found between performing and composing in the classroom, suggesting that they are closely linked and may indeed be related parts of the same trait. This may have implications for the ways in which composing and performing are taught and assessed. A larger-scale study could be undertaken to investigate this further.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 5 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMABILE, T. (1982) Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AUSTIN, J. R. & VISPOEL, W. P. (1992) Motivation after failure in school music performance classes: the facilitative effects of strategy attributions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 111, 1–23.Google Scholar
BERGEE, M. J. (1992) A comparison of faculty, peer and self-evaluations of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERKLEY, R. (2001) Why is teaching composing so challenging? A survey of classroom observation and teachers’ opinions. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRISLIN, R. W. (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research, pp. 137–164. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
BRODSKY, W. (1996) Music performance anxiety reconceptualised: a critique of current research practices and findings. Medical Problems of Performing Arts, 11, 3, 88–98.Google Scholar
BUNTING, T. (2002) Composing in the music curriculum. In Spruce, G. (Ed.), Teaching Music in the Secondary Schools: A Reader. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
BUTTON, S. (2006) Key Stage 3 pupils’ perception of music. Music Education Research, 8, 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLAXTON, G. (1995) What kind of learning does self-assessment drive? Developing a ‘nose’ for quality: comments on Klenowski. Assessment in Education, 2, 3, 39–43.Google Scholar
CRONBACH, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIDSON, J. (1993) Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychology of Music, 21, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION (1995) Music in the National Curriculum. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE (1992) Music in the National Curriculum (England). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DUERKSEN, G. L. (1972) Some effects of expectation on evaluation of recorded musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20, 268–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAULKNER, R. (2003) Group composing: pupil perceptions from a social psychological study. Music Education Research, 5, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAUTLEY, M. (2010) Assessment in Music Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FAUTLEY, M. & SAVAGE, J. (2011) Assessment of composing in the lower secondary school in the English National Curriculum. British Journal of Music Education, 20, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIELD, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics using SPSS. 3rd edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
FLORES, R. G. & GINSBURGH, V. A. (1996) The Queen Elisabeth musical competition: how fair is the final ranking? The Statistician, 45, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FODDY, W. (1993) Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOOLSBY, T. W. (1995) Portfolio assessment for better evaluation. Music Educators Journal, 82, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HALLAM, S. (2006) Music Psychology in Education. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
HICKEY, M. (2003) Creative thinking in the context of music composition. In Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Educators. Reston, VA: MENC.Google Scholar
HUNTER, D. & RUSS, M. (1996) Peer assessment in performance studies. British Journal of Music Education, 13, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIETZ, P. (2010) Research into questionnaire design: a summary of the literature. International Journal of Market Research, 52, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAJOR, A. (2008) Appraising composing in secondary-school music lessons. Music Education Research, 10, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCPHERSON, G. E. & THOMPSON, W. F. (1998) Assessing music performance: issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 12, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MELLOR, E. (1999) Language and music teaching: the use of personal construct theory to investigate teachers’ responses to young people's music compositions. Music Education Research, 1, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLS, J. (1991) Assessing musical performance musically. Educational Studies, 17, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAME (National Association of Music Educators) (2011) Assessing Pupils’ Progress (APP) in secondary music departments: Guidance notes, www.name.org.uk/projects/app/assessing-pupils-progress-app, accessed 15 May 2011.Google Scholar
ODAM, G. (2000) Teaching composing in secondary schools: the creative dream. British Journal of Music Education, 17, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OFSTED (2009) Making More of Music: Improving the Quality of Music Teaching in Secondary Schools. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
OPPENHEIM, A. N. (1992) Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
PAYNTER, J. (1997) The form of finality: a context for musical education. British Journal of Music Education, 14, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHILPOTT, C. (Ed.) (2001) Learning to Teach Music in the Secondary School. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
PRATT, G. & STEPHENS, J. (1995) Teaching Music in the National Curriculum. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
QCA (2007) Music – Programme of Study: Key Stage 3, QCA www.qca.org.uk/curriculum, accessed 14 December 2008.Google Scholar
SADLER, D. R. (1987) Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SLOBODA, J. (1985) The Musical Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
SPRUCE, G (2002) Assessment in the arts: Issues of objectivity. In Spruce, G. (Ed.), Teaching Music in the Secondary Schools: A Reader. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
SWANWICK, K. (1994) Musical Knowledge: Intuition, Analysis and Music Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
SWANWICK, K. (1998) The perils and possibilities of assessment. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SWANWICK, K. & FRANCA, C. (1999) Composing, performing and audience-listening as indicators of musical understanding. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WAPNICK, J., FLOWERS, P., ALEGANT, M. & JASINSKAS, L. (1993) Consistency in piano performance evaluations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZIMMERMAN, M. P. (1993) An overview of developmental research in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 116, 1–21.Google Scholar