Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:45:04.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing music: exploratory studies into the low uptake of music GCSE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Alexandra Lamont  and
Karl Maton
Alexandra Lamont
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UKa.m.lamont@keele.ac.uk
Karl Maton
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Sydney, RC Mills Building, Sydney, Australiakmaton@usyd.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

School music has a comparatively low take-up rate as a qualification among English secondary school pupils. Existing research on the issue has proffered possible reasons for this phenomenon but has generally been piecemeal and undertheorised. This paper sets out a fresh theoretical perspective capable of providing a basis for systematic empirical research, and discusses the results of two exploratory studies. Drawing on legitimation code theory, a new approach in the sociology of education that focuses on the basis of achievement within educational contexts, the paper analyses National Curriculum, GCSE syllabi and pupils' attitudes towards a range of school subjects, including music. The documentary analysis highlights that earlier stages of the music curriculum emphasise either musical knowledge or musical dispositions of knowers, but music at GCSE level represents an ‘elite code’ where achievement depends upon both possessing specialist knowledge and being the right kind of knower. The study of pupils' attitudes suggests this code shift is recognised by pupils and may play a role in the low uptake of music for GCSE study. This new framework offers a firmer foundation for future empirical research into attitudes towards school subjects and subject choices.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , November 2008 , pp. 267 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADEY, K. & BIDDULPH, M. (2001) ‘The influence of pupil perceptions on subject choice at 14+ in geography and history’, Educational Studies, 27 (4), 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AQA (2004) General Certificate of Secondary Education: Music 2004 (version 1.2). London: Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (www.aqa.org.uk).Google Scholar
BELL, J. F. (2001) ‘Patterns of subject uptake and examination entry 1984–1997’, Educational Studies, 27 (2), 201–219.Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, B. (1975) Class, Codes and Control, Volume III: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, B. (2000) Class, Codes and Control, Volume V: Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
BOURDIEU, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRAY, D. (2000) ‘An examination of GCSE music uptake rates’, British Journal of Music Education, 17 (1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROWN, C. (2001) ‘Can legislation reduce gender differences in subject choice? A survey of GCSE and A level entries between 1970 and 1995’, Educational Studies, 27 (2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARVALHO, L. & DONG, A. (2007) ‘Knowledge and identity in the design field’, Paper presented at Connect-Ed International Conference on Design Education, University of New South Wales, July.Google Scholar
DAVIES, L. & STEPHENS, J. (2004) Creating chances for making music: The story of the Wider Opportunities Pilot Programme. London: Youth Music (http://www.thesoundstation.org.uk/adult_site/Downloads/WiderOpps_CreatingChances.pdf).Google Scholar
DfES/DCMS (2004) Music Manifesto Report No. 1. London: Department for Education and Skills/Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Google Scholar
DfES/DCMS (2006) Music Manifesto Report No. 2: Making Every Child's Music Matter. London: Department for Education and Skills/Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Google Scholar
DfES/QCA (1999) The National Curriculum for England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DOHERTY, C. (2008) ‘Student subsidy of the internationalized curriculum: knowing, voicing and producing the other’, Pedagogy, Culture & Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EDEXCEL (2000) Specification: Edexcel GCSE in Music: First examination 2003. London: Edexcel Limited.Google Scholar
EDEXCEL (2006) Specification: Edexcel GCSE in Music: First examination 2008 (Issue 2). London: Edexcel Limited.Google Scholar
FRANCIS, B. (2000) ‘The gendered subject: students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability’, Oxford Review of Education, 26 (1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GREEN, L. (2001) How Popular Musicians Learn. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (2006) ‘Popular music education in and for itself, and for ‘other’ music: current research in the classroom’, International Journal of Music Education, 24 (2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARLAND, J., KINDER, K., LORD, P., STOTT, A., Schagen, I., Haynes, J., with Cusworth, L., White, R. & Paola, R. (2000) Arts Education in Secondary Schools: Effects and Effectiveness. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
HOOD, S. (2007) ‘Arguing in and across disciplinary boundaries: Legitimising stategies in applied linguistics and cultural studies’, in McCabe, A., O'Donnell, M. & Whittaker, R. (Eds.), Advances in Language and Education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
KONZA, D. & MATON, K. (2006) ‘Increasing the Capacity of Students with Asperger's Syndrome to Achieve Across the Curriculum’. Paper presented at Australian Association of Special Education National Conference, Sept-Oct, Canberra.Google Scholar
LAMONT, A., HARGREAVES, D. J., MARSHALL, N. A. & TARRANT, M. (2003). ‘Young people's music in and out of school’, British Journal of Music Education, 20 (3), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARSHALL, N. A. & HARGREAVES, D. J. (2007) ‘Crossing the hump-back bridge: Primary-secondary school transition in music education’, Music Education Research, 9 (1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MATON, K. (2000) ‘Languages of legitimation: the structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21 (2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MATON, K. (2006) ‘The invisible tribunal: canons, knower structures and democratic access in the arts and humanities’, paper prepared for the Fourth Basil Bernstein Symposium, Rutgers University, Newark, USA, July.Google Scholar
MATON, K. (2007) ‘Knowledge-knower structures in intellectual and educational fields’, in Christie, F. & Martin, J. (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 87–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
MILLS, J. (1997) ‘Music inspection 1995/96, main findings’, YES magazine, 26, 3.Google Scholar
MOORE, R. & MATON, K. (2001) ‘Founding the sociology of knowledge: Basil Bernstein, intellectual fields and the epistemic device’, in Morais, A., Neves, I., Davies, B. & Daniels, H. (Eds.), Towards a Sociology of Pedagogy: The Contribution of Basil Bernstein to Research (pp. 153–182). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
OCR (2000) OCR GCSE in Music, 1919. London: Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations.Google Scholar
OCR (2005) OCR GCSE in Music, 1919 (2nd Edition). London: Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations.Google Scholar
QCA (2002) GCSE Examination Results 1992–2001. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (http://www.qca.org.uk/rs/statistics/gcse_results.asp).Google Scholar
QCA (2004a) Music in Key Stage 4: Developing qualifications within the vision of a holistic and progressive music education for all. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Music Development Group Working Paper.Google Scholar
QCA (2004b) National Curriculum Online: Programmes of Study: Music. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (http://www.nc.uk.net/).Google Scholar
QCA (2005) GCSE Subject Criteria for Music. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (http://www.qca.org.uk/downloads/5712_music_gcse_criteria.pd.pdf).Google Scholar
SLOBODA, J.A. (2001) ‘Emotion, functionality, and the everyday experience of music: where does music education fit?’, Music Education Research, 3 (2), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STABLES, A. (1996) Subjects of Choice: The Process and Management of Pupil and Student Choice. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
VAN DE WERFHORST, H. G., SULLIVAN, A. & CHEUNG, S. Y. (2003) ‘Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain’. British Educational Research Journal, 29 (1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WARRINGTON, M., YOUNGER, M. & WILLIAMS, J. (2000) ‘Student attitudes, image and the gender gap’, British Educational Research Journal, 26 (3), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHEELAHAN, L. (2005) ‘Comparing realist and rationalist defences of propositional knowledge in the curriculum’, paper presented at Engaging Realist Alternatives: IACR Conference, Sydney, July.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, R. (2002) ‘Music for all? Pupils’ perceptions of the GCSE Music examination in one South Wales secondary school’, British Journal of Music Education, 19 (3), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YOUTH MUSIC (2006) Our Music: Musical Engagement of Young People aged 7–19 in the UK. Omnibus survey, May 2006. London: Youth Music.Google Scholar