Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-s56hc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T09:10:02.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Techniques of Composition in the British and Irish University Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Abstract

Most university students of music, including many who are accomplished both academically and as instrumentalists, consistently under-achieve in the subject areas commonly known as ‘techniques of composition’. Why this is so, and how this aspect of the university curriculum has come about in Britain and Ireland, are the subjects of this paper. At a time when formal methods are being replaced by free composition in the secondary school music curriculum, the future direction of third-level studies is very much in doubt. Because school-leavers are less well equipped than formerly in musical rudiments and basic harmony, some university music departments have abandoned techniques teaching altogether – those where it is retained being seen as bastions of conservatism. In view of the obvious shortcomings of existing methods their demise is understandable. Future developments, however, must not be determined by reaction, but guided by research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, H. K. (1950) The Oxford Harmony, vol. 2. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, H. K. (1958) An Introduction to the Technique of Palestrina. London:Novello & Co.Google Scholar
Andrews, H. K. (1966) The Technique of Byrd's Vocal Polyphony. London:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. (1967) Bach's Instrumental Counterpoint. London:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boydell, B. (1989) Thomas Bateson and the earliest degrees in music awarded by the University of Dublin. Hermathena, 144, 5360.Google Scholar
Bridge, J. F. (1878) Counterpoint. London:Novello, Ewer & Co.Google Scholar
Buck, P. C. (1911) Unfigured Harmony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bullivant, R. (1971) Fugue. London:Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Butterworth, A. (1992) Stylistic Harmony. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callcott, J. W. (1809) A Musical Grammar, 2nd ed.London: Robert BircHall.Google Scholar
Carpenter, N. C. (1958) Music in the Medieval and Renaissance Universities. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Crotch, W. (1812) Elements of Musical Composition. 2nd ed. 1833. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman. Reprinted 1991. Aberystwyth: Boethius Press.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C. (1967) Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality. English translation by Gjerdingen, Robert O. 1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dart, T. (1964) The origins of music degrees. The Musical Times, 105, 190191.Google Scholar
David, H. T. & Mendel, A. (1945) The Bach Reader. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Davies, H. W. (1951) Music, teaching of. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. London.Google Scholar
Day, A. (1845) A Treatise on Harmony. London:Cramer, Beale & Co.Google Scholar
Dent, E. J. (1940) The teaching of strict counterpoint. The Music Review, 1, 201–13.Google Scholar
Dibble, J. (1992) ‘National developments in Britain and Ireland: a matter of style and morality'. In Andraschke, Peter & Spaude, Edelgard (Eds), Welttheater: Die Kiinste im 19. Jahrhundert, pp. 5865. Freiburg: Rombach Verlag.Google Scholar
Hadden, J. C. (1910) ‘Musical diplomas and degrees'. In Greig, John (Ed.), The Musical Educator, 2nd ed., vol. 5, pp. 181212. London: Caxton.Google Scholar
Harrison, F. LL. (1992) ‘Music at Oxford before 1500'. In Catto, J. I. & Evans, Ralph (Eds), The History of the University of Oxford, vol. 3, pp. 347–71. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, K. (1923) The Style of Palestrina and the Dissonance. Rev. ed. 1946. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, K. (1931) Counterpoint: the Polyphonic Style of the Sixteenth Century. English translation by Haydon, Glen 1939. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kitson, C. H. (1907) The Art of Counterpoint and its application as a decorative principle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kitson, C. H. (1914) The Evolution of Harmony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (1934) Music Ho! London:Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Lester, J. (1989) Between Modes and Keys. Stuyvesant, N.Y.: Pendragon.Google Scholar
Lester, J. (1992) Compositional Theory in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. S. (1894) Practical Harmony. London:Joseph Williams.Google Scholar
Mann, A. (1944) Johann Joseph Fux, Steps to Parnassus. London:J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Mann, A. (1960) The Study of Fugue. London:Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Mann, A. (1987) Theory and Practice: the Great Composers as teachers and students. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Middleton, H. S. (1945) Music studies. Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, 71, 4968.Google Scholar
Morris, R. O. (1922) Contrapuntal Technique in the Sixteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Morris, R. O. (1946) The Oxford Harmony, vol. 1. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, G. (1948) The Technique and Spirit of Fugue. London:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ouseley, F. A. (1868) A Treatise on Harmony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prout, E. (1889) Harmony: its Theory and Practice. London:Augener & Co.Google Scholar
Prout, E. (1890) Counterpoint Strict and Free. London:Augener & Co.Google Scholar
Prout, E. (1892) Fugue. London:Augener & Co.Google Scholar
Prout, E. (1895) Applied Forms. London:Augener & Co.Google Scholar
Prout, E. (1901) Harmony: its Theory and Practice. Rev. ed. London: Augener & Co.Google Scholar
Rainbow, B. (1991) Introduction to reprint of William Crotch, Elements of Musical Composition. Aberystwyth: Boethius Press.Google Scholar
Riemenschneider, A. (1941) 371 Harmonized Chorales and 69 Chorale Melodies with Figured Bass by Johann Sebastian Bach. New York & London: G. Schirmer.Google Scholar
Rockstro, W. S. (1882) The Rules of Counterpoint systematically arranged for the use of young students. London:Cocks & Co.Google Scholar
Rubbra, E. (1960) Counterpoint: a survey. London:Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Scholes, P. A. (1938) Degrees and diplomas in music. The Oxford Companion to Music. London:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shirlaw, M. (1917) The Theory of Harmony… With an examination of the chief systems of harmony from Rameau to the present day. London:Novello & Co.Google Scholar
Stainer, J. (1871) A Theory of Harmony Founded on the Tempered Scale. London:Rivingtons.Google Scholar
Stainer, J. (1897) A Few Words to Candidates for the Degree of Mm. Bac. Oxon. London & New York: Novello, Ewer & Co.Google Scholar
Swindale, O. (1962) Polyphonic Composition. An introduction to the art of composing vocal counterpoint in the sixteenth-century style. London:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, C. S. (1929) J. S. Bach's Four-Part Chorales. London:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vignoles, O. J. (1899) Memoir of Sir R. P. Stewart. London & Dublin: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.Google Scholar
Walker, E., rev. Franklyn, C. A. H. (1954) Degrees in music. Groves Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 5th ed.London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
White, J. D. (1981) Guidelines for College Teaching of Music Theory. Metuchen, N.J. & London: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. F. A. (1893) A Short Historical Account of the Degrees in Music at Oxford and Cambridge, with a chronological list of graduates …from the year 1463. London:Novello, Ewer & Co.Google Scholar