Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:49:01.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of abomasal infusions of casein or soya-bean-protein isolate on the milk production of dairy cows in mid-lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Jai-Jun Choung  and
David G. Chamberlain
Jai-Jun Choung
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
David G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of abomasal infusion of casein or soya-bean-protein isolate (SPI) on milk production were investigated in four Friesian cows in mid-lactation receiving a basal diet of grass silage and barley which supplied energy and protein considerably in excess of requirements for milk production by conventional rationing standards. Three levels of infusion were used for each protein source, the corresponding doses being isonitrogenous for each of the proteins: 100, 220 and 330 g/d for casein and 115, 230 and 345 g/d for SPI. Casein produced much greater effects on the yield of milk and milk constituents than did SPI. On the highest dose of casein, milk yield was increased by 3.5 kg/d, fat output by 15% and protein output by 36%; corresponding values for the highest dose of SPI were 1.6 kg/d, 12% and 13% respectively. Increases in the yield of milk-protein were linear for casein but for SPI there was no increase beyond the first level of infusion. It was calculated that casein infusion had a marked effect on the utilization of energy: the increases in milk production could be explained either by a channelling of an extra 12 MJ metabolizable energy (ME)/d away from body tissue synthesis and into milk synthesis or by an increase in the efficiency of utilization of ME for lactation from 0.50 on the basal diet to 0.58; the measurements made did not allow the two mechanisms to be clearly differentiated.

Keywords

Abomasal protein infusionsCaseinSoya-bean-protein isolateMilk productionDairy cow
Type
Metabolic Effects of Nutrient Intakes
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 103 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1993

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, Suppl. no. 1. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Bauman, D. E. & Currie, W. B. (1980). Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 1514–1529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, D. G., Martin, P. A. & Robertson, S. (1989). Optimizing compound feed use in dairy cows with high intakes of silage. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition -1989, pp. 175–193 [Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Quig, J. (1986). Utilization of silage nitrogen in sheep and cows: amino acid composition of duodenal digesta and rumen microbes. Grass and Forage Science 41, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choung, J. J. & Chamberlain, D. G. (1992). Protein nutrition of dairy cows receiving grass silage diets. Effects on silage intake and milk production of postruminal supplements of casein or soya-protein isolate and the effects of intravenous infusions of a mixture of methionine, phenylalanine and tryptophan. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. H. (1975). Lactational responses to postruminal administration of proteins and amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 1178–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, B. G. & Boucque, G. N. (1968). Rapid method for the gas chromotographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. J., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. & Pennie, K. (1981). Effects of protein concentration in the diet on milk yield, change in body composition and the efficiency of utilization of body tissue for milk production in ewes. Animal Production 33, 111–120.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. & Gibson, Q. H. (1954). The estimation of lactic acid using ceric sulphate. Biochemical Journal 58, 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, D. I. (1986). New methods for predicting the nutritive value of silage. In Developments in Silage 1986, pp. 66–75 [Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M., editors]. Marlow, Bucks: Chalcombe Publications.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analysis. USDA Agriculture Handbook no. 379, pp. 1–20, Beltsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Huida, L. (1982). Gas chromatographic determination of water and ethanol in silage by internal standard method. Journal of the Agricultural Society of Finland 54, 137–143.Google Scholar
Keutmann, H. T. & Potts, J. T. (1969). Improved recovery of methionine after acid hydrolysis using mercaptoethanol. Analytical Biochemistry 29, 175–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
König, B. A., Oldham, J. D. & Parker, D. S. (1984). The effect of abomasal infusion of casein on acetate, palmitate and glucose kinetics in cows during early lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, N. A., Corrigall, W., Stirton, R. A. & Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Intragastric infusion of nutrients in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 547–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1968). Enzyme method for the determination of a-linked glucose polymers in biological materials. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19, 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981). The Analysis of Agricultural Materials. Technical Bulletin RB 427. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. & Kay, R. N. B. (1977). Effect of postruminal glucose or protein supplementation on milk yield and composition in Friesian cows in early lactation and negative energy balance. British Journal of Nutrition 38, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, R. W., Lane, P. W., Ainsley, H. E., Bricknell, K. E., Digby, P. G. N., Harding, S. A., Leech, P. K., Simpson, H. R., Todd, A. P., Verrier, P. J. & White, R. P. (1987). Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rulquin, H. (1982). Effets sur la digestion et le métabolisme des vaches laitieres d'infusions d'acides gras volatils dans le rumen et de castinate dans le duodenum. 1. Production et digestion (Effects of the infusion of volatile fatty acids into the rumen and caseinate into the duodenum on digestion and metabolism in dairy cows 1. Production and digestion). Reproduction, Nutrition Developpement 22, 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1945). A new reagent for the determination of sugars. Journal of Biological Chemistry 160, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugano, M., Ishiwaki, N., Nagata, Y. & Imaizumi, K. (1982). Effects of arginine and lysine addition to casein and soya-bean protein on serum lipids, apolipoproteins, insulin and glucagon in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C. & Kelly, M. E. (1976). The effect of frequency of feeding on milk secretion in the Ayrshire cow. Journal of Dairy Research 43, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trigg, T. E., Parr, C. R., Day, A. M. & Parsons, B. W. (1983). Effects on milk production and energy metabolism of abomasal infusions of protein to lactating, pasture-fed dairy cows. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. European Association of Animal Production Publications no. 29, pp. 42–45 [Akern, A. and Sundstd, F., editors]. Ski, Norway: Informasjonsteknikk A/S.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F., Haaland, G. L., Moe, P. W. & Brown, A. C. G. (1983). Effect of level and solubility of dietary protein on the energy value of rations fed to lactating dairy cows. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 29, pp. 14–17 [Akern, A. and Sundstsl, F., editors]. Ski, Norway: Informasjonsteknikk A/S.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. & Moe, P. W. (1980). Effect of protein level and buffering capacity on energy value of feeds for lactating dairy cows. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 311–313 [Mount, L. E., editor]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umagat, H., Kucera, P. & Wem, L. H. (1982). Total amino acid analysis using pre-column fluorescence derivatization. Journal of Chromatography 239, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, E. F. (1990). The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy for lactation from grass silage-based diets. In Proceedings of the Ninth Silage Conference, pp. 36–37. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: University of Newcastle- Upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Vermorel, M., Remond, B., Vernet, J. & Liamadis, D. (1983). Utilization of body reserves by high-producing cows in early lactation: effects of crude protein and amino acid supply. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 29, pp. 18–21 [Akern, A. and Sundstd, F., editors]. Ski, Norway: Informasjonsteknikk A/S.Google Scholar
Waite, R., White, J. C. D. & Robertson, A. (1956). Variations in the chemical composition of milk with particular reference to the solids-not-fat. 1. The effect of stage of lactation, season of year and age of cow. Journal of Dairy Research 23, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Milne, J. S., Ørskov, E. R. & Smith, J. S. (1986). The nitrogen and energy metabolism of lactating cows given abomasal infusion of casein. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed