Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T10:17:02.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of phosphorus depletion, and of calcium and phosphorus intake, on the endogenous excretion of these elements by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

V. R. Young ,
G. P. Lofgreen  and
J. R. Luick
V. R. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of California, Davis, California, USA
G. P. Lofgreen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of California, Davis, California, USA
J. R. Luick
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of California, Davis, California, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Injections of 32P and 45Ca were used to study the influence of phosphorus depletion and repletion on the rates of endogenous calcium and P excretion in fifteen P-depleted and eighteen control sheep. 2. When given adequate P, there was a marked increase in the rate of excretion of metabolic faecal P in sheep which previously had been depleted. In control sheep a decrease was found in metabolic faecal P excretion with a diet deficient in P. 3. From the values for metabolic faecal P an indirect estimate of total intestinal secretion was made. The estimate was found to be in approximate agreement with values derived from published values for total daily digestive secretions in sheep. 4. The estimated rates of secretion of intestinal P suggest that after the addition of P to the diet the changes in the rate of excretion of metabolic faecal P in P-depleted sheep were the result of a decreased reabsorption of intestinally secreted P rather than of a change in the rate of secretion into the intestine. After a diet low in this element the decrease in metabolic faecal P excretion by control sheep appeared to be the result of a decreased rate of intestinal P secretion. 5. The possible significance of changes in metabolic faecal P excretion in relation to body P homoeostasis in the ruminant animal is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 795 - 805
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

Adams, E. P. & Heath, T. J. (1963). Biochim. biophys. Acta 70, 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, J.-P., Bronner, F. & Richelle, L. J. (1963). J. clin. Invest. 42, 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, M., Spencer, H., Swernov, J., Greenberg, J. & Laszlo, D. (1957). J. Nutr. 61, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronner, F. (1964). In Mineral Metabolism. Vol. 2, part A, ch. 20. [Comar, C. L. and Bronner, F., editors.] New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Bronner, F., Richelle, L. J., Saville, P. D., Nicholas, J. A. & Cobb, J. R. (1963). J. clin. Invest. 42, 898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, A. (1953). Acta pharmac. tox. 9, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, P. T. & Cragle, R. G. (1962). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 111, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comar, C. L. (1955). Proc. int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy 1. Geneva. Vol. 12, p. 241.Google Scholar
Copp, D. H., Hamilton, J. G., Jones, D. C., Thompson, D. M. & Cramer, C. (1951). Rep. Univ. Calif. Radiat. Lab. no. 1464.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. (1961). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, p. 70. [Lewis, D., editor.] London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A.-R. & Fuchs, F. (1953–1954). Acta physiol. scand. 30, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, W. & Comar, C. L. (1964). Nature, Lond. 202, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard, S. L. & Plumlee, M. P. (1954). J. Nutr. 54, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, F. A. & Hill, K. J. (1962). J. Physiol., Lond. 162, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1953). Br.J. Nutr. 7, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. (1963). In World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics. Vol. 3, p. 131. [Bourne, G. H., editor.] New York: Hafner Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Irving, J. T. (1964). In Mineral Metabolism. Vol. 2, part A, ch. 18. [Comar, C. L. and Bronner, F., editors.] New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1960). J. Physiol., Lond. 150, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjerulf-Jensen, K. (1941–1942). Acta physiol. scand. 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M., Smith, A. H., Ralston, N. P. & Black, A. L. (1951). J. Nutr. 45, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P., Kleiber, M. & Smith, A. H. (1952). J. Nutr. 47, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueker, C. E. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1961). J. Nutr. 74, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, M. J. & Phillipson, A. T. (1952). J. Physiol., Lond. 116, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHardy, G. J. R. & Parsons, D. S. (1956). Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 41, 398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, R. L. & Pfander, W. H. (1964). J. Nutr. 83, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, F. A. & Morrell, E. (1960). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 19: 1014.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H., Kleiber, M., Black, A. L. & Baxter, C. F. (1955). J. Nutr. 57, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. H., Kleiber, M., Black, A. L. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1956). J. Nutr. 58, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1961). Nature, Lond. 190, 1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. (1965). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 24, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, D. E. & Peel, L. (1963). Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visek, W. J., Monroe, R. A., Swanson, E. W. & Comar, C. L. (1953). J. Nutr. 50, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R., Luick, J. R. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R., Richards, W. P. C., Lofgreen, G. P. & Luick, J. R. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar