Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T19:18:03.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community Studies and Decision-Taking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Theresa Brown ,
M. J. C. Vile  and
M. F. Whitemore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the past, the literature of community power studies has been bedevilled by two interrelated divisions amongst those who have conducted these studies. On the one hand, there has been a complex and bitter dispute about techniques, and on the other there has been a battle between the Sociologists who espoused a stratification theory and saw in all community structures a recurrent pattern of elites, and the Political Scientists who, with almost equal persistence, have found pluralistic structures. In this paper we wish if possible to break with this increasingly barren discussion and to use the study of the town of Ashford in Kent, with which we have been engaged in recent years, in order to illustrate what we hope to be a rather more fruitful approach to the analysis of community power structure. Our contention is that in this field of political science, which has claimed to be extremely scientific in its approach, there has been no real attempt to apply a thorough-going scientific methodology, and, as a result, the discussion has become bogged-down in a dispute about methods, in which the protagonists have become so embroiled that they have lost sight of the basic problem. Important as has been this debate about methods, it has taken attention away from the need to develop a theoretical framework for the study of community power which will enable us to transcend a level of the discussion which has largely been conducted by two ideologically opposed schools of thought, each determined to prove the other wrong.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 133 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S., ‘Two Faces of Power’, The American Political Science LVI (1962), 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Banfield, E. C. and Wilson, J. Q., City Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), pp. 273–5.Google Scholar

3 Newton, K., ‘City Politics in Britain and the United States’, Political Studies, XVII (1969) 208–18, p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Agger, R. E., Goldrich, D. and Swanson, B. E., The Rulers and the Ruled: Political Power and Impotence in American Communities (New York: John Wiley, 1963).Google Scholar

5 Clark, T. N., ‘Current Topics in Research on Community Decision-Making’, The New Atlantis, 2 (1970), 3–11, p. 10.Google Scholar

6 Anton, T. J., ‘Power, Pluralism and Local Polities’, Administrative Science Quarterly, VII (1963), 425–57, pp. 449–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 We are of course aware of the problems of handling ‘non-decisions’ and the vital part that these may play in the working of the political system, but we cannot deal with this problem in the present paper.

8 Anton, , ‘Power, Pluralism and Local Polities’, p. 451.Google Scholar

9 Forwood, R., ‘Issue Analysis in Community Power Studies’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, xv (1969), 26–44, P. 29.Google Scholar