Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
CUSACK, THOMAS R.
IVERSEN, TORBEN
and
SOSKICE, DAVID
2007.
Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 101,
Issue. 3,
p.
373.
Manow, Philip
and
Döring, Holger
2008.
Electoral and Mechanical Causes of Divided Government in the European Union.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 10,
p.
1349.
Blau, Adrian
2008.
The Effective Number of Parties At Four Scales.
Party Politics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
167.
Bingham Powell, G.
2009.
The Ideological Congruence Controversy.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 12,
p.
1475.
Kang, Shin-Goo
and
Powell, G. Bingham
2010.
Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 4,
p.
1014.
Golder, Matt
and
Stramski, Jacek
2010.
Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
90.
Thomas, Kathrin
2010.
The Thermostatic Model of Representation Reviewed.
European Political Science,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 4,
p.
533.
DUCH, RAYMOND M.
MAY, JEFF
and
ARMSTRONG, DAVID A.
2010.
Coalition-directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 104,
Issue. 4,
p.
698.
Casado-Asensio, Juan
and
Lefkofridi, Zoe
2011.
Representation in the European Union: Congruence Between Citizens and Elites in the European Parliament's Two-Level Setting.
Perspectives on European Politics and Society,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
161.
DEWAN, TORUN
and
SPIRLING, ARTHUR
2011.
Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 105,
Issue. 2,
p.
337.
Achen, Christopher H.
Dalton, Russell J.
Huber, John
Kedar, Orit
Shively, W. Phillips
and
Strøm, Kaare
2011.
Context, Behavior, Outcomes, and Tradeoffs: The Intellectual Contributions of G. Bingham Powell, Jr. to the Study of Comparative Democratic Processes.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 4,
p.
857.
König, Thomas
and
Debus, Marc
2011.
Reform Processes and Policy Change.
Vol. 16,
Issue. ,
p.
269.
Chen, Tse-hsin
2011.
Uncovering the micro-foundations of turnout and electoral systems.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 2,
p.
295.
Warwick, Paul V.
2011.
Government Intentions and Citizen Preferences in Dynamic Perspective.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 3,
p.
599.
Lindstädt, René
and
Vander Wielen, Ryan J.
2012.
Dynamic Partisanship: Party Loyalty and Agenda Setting in the U.S. House.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
DWYER, J. H.
2012.
Japan Transformed: Political Change and Economic Restructuring.
Social Science Japan Journal,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
264.
Kim, Hee Min
and
Fording, Richard C.
2012.
Do voter preferences matter between elections? Democratic performance in Western Democracies.
International Area Studies Review,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
122.
Liao, Dachi
Lin, Cheng-Hsun
and
Chen, Boyu
2012.
The Effects of Electoral Rules Upon Legislators’ Campaign Promises and Legislative Performance - A Comparison of Taiwan Legislative Yuan between its Sixth Term (2005-2008) and Seventh Term (2008-2012).
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Warwick, Paul
and
Zakharova, Maria
2013.
Measuring the Median: The Risks of Inferring Beliefs from Votes.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Sasada, Hironori
Fujimura, Naofumi
and
Machidori, Satoshi
2013.
Alternative Paths to Party Polarization: External Impacts of Intraparty Organization in Japan.
Journal of East Asian Studies,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 3,
p.
409.