Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2010
As with any other institution, a scholarly journal can be understood as a system of norms. This article examines those norms, drawing its evidence from participant observation over a number of years. It discusses particular norms as they apply to authors, reviewers and editors, before considering some general themes including: the implicit nature of the norms and tacit knowledge, changes in norms and monitoring.
1 Popper, Karl R., Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford: Clarendon, 1972), pp. 107–108Google Scholar.
2 Almond, Gabriel A. and Coleman, James S., The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1960), p. 4Google Scholar.
3 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, revd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 [1972])Google Scholar.
4 Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957)Google Scholar.
5 Downs, , An Economic Theory of Democracy, p. 267Google Scholar.
6 See, for example, Universities UK, The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Quality in UK Higher Education Institutions (London: Universities UK, 2007), p. 23, available at: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Pages/Publication-275.aspx, last accessed 6 May 2010.
7 Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, edited by P. Laslett (New York: Mentor, 1965 [1690]), p. 316Google Scholar.
8 Urmson, J. O., ‘Saints and Heroes’, in Joel Feinberg, ed., Moral Concepts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 60–73Google Scholar, originally in Melden, A. I., ed., Essays in Moral Philosophy (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958), pp. 198–216Google Scholar.
9 For Habermas on the ‘ideal-speech situation’, see, inter alia, Habermas, Jürgen, Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, translated by Ciaran Cronin (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), chap. 2 and pp. 187–188Google Scholar.
10 House of Commons, Committee on Science and Technology, Eighth Report, The Disclosure of Climate Data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, chap. 2, available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/387/38702.htm (last accessed 6 May 2010.
11 Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 45Google Scholar.
