Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T15:17:39.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Obstacles to the Establishment of Political Legitimacy in Communist Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Extract

Legitimacy may be defined as that political condition in which power-holders are able to justify their holding of power in terms other than those of the mere fact of power-holding. According to one view such justifications are increasingly tenuous due to the conditions under which the modern state has arisen and the means it employs in order to persist. Theories of legitimacy typically view power from two aspects – from that of its origins and from that of its ends. More concretely, this invariably involves, on the one hand, some discussion of the degree to which a regime of a government.can be said to rest on democratic consent and, on the other, of the extent to which the regime or government guides its actions by some notion of the common good or public interest. Neither of these focuses, in Schaar's view, are likely to provide adequate justifications for power under modern conditions: ‘criticism and hard events have done their work: both concepts have been reduced to rubble’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schaar, J., ‘Legitimacy in the Modern State’ in Green, P. and Levinson, S., eds., Power and Community (New York: Vintage Books, 1970), p. 288.Google Scholar

2 Lowenthal, R., ‘On “Established” Communist Party Regimes’, Studies in Comparative Communism, VII (1974), 335–58, pp. 351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Szporluk, R., ‘Poland’ in Grew, R., ed., Crises of Political Development in Europe and the United States (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1978), p. 415.Google Scholar

4 Karol, K. S., ‘How to Change Things for Good’ in ‘Il Manifesto’ Conference, Power and Opposition in Post-Revolutionary Societies (London: Ink Links, 1979), p. 147.Google Scholar

5 Croan, M., ‘The Leading Role of the Party’ in Janos, A., ed., Authoritarian Politics in Communist Europe (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, 1976), p. 170.Google Scholar

6 Brzezinski, Z., The Soviet Bloc (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), p. 96.Google Scholar

7 Szczypiorski, A., ‘The Limits of Political Realism’, Survey, XXIV (1979). 2132. p. 26.Google Scholar

8 Korbonski, A., ‘Poland’, in Rakowska-Harmstone, T. and Gyorgy, A., eds., Communism in Eastern Europe (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979). p. 41.Google Scholar

9 Tarniewski, M., Pareja wolności (Paris: Kultura, 1979), p. 138.Google Scholar

10 Bethell, N., Gomuika (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972), p. 202.Google Scholar

11 ABC, ‘1956–1970–1980’, Kultura, 11 1980, p. 19.Google Scholar

12 Sakwa, G., ‘The Polish October’, Polish Review, XXIII (1978), 6278, p. 76.Google Scholar

13 Pienkos, D., ‘Party Elites and Society’, Polish Review, XX (1975), 2742, p. 37.Google Scholar

14 Beck, C., ‘Leadership Attributes in Eastern Europe’ in Beck, C. et al. , eds., Comparative Communist Political Leadership (New York: David McKay, 1973), p. 98.Google Scholar

15 Staniszkis, J., ‘On Some Contradictions of Socialist Society’, Soviet Studies, XXXI (1979), 167–87, p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Statisticheski Ezhegodnik (1974), p. 53.Google Scholar

17 Bromke, A., ‘La nouvelle élite politique en Pologne’, Revue de l'est' (07 1974), 718, p. 17.Google Scholar

18 Tellenback, S., ‘The Logic of Development in Socialist Poland’, Social Forces, LVII (1978), 436–56, p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Dean, R., ‘Gierek's Three Years’, Survey, XX (1974), 5975, p. 67.Google Scholar

20 Polityka, 18 10 1980.Google Scholar

21 Polityka, 16 05 1981.Google Scholar

22 Polityka, 27 10 1976.Google Scholar

23 Blazynski, G., Flashpoint Poland (New York: Pergamon Books, 1979), p. 321.Google Scholar

24 Further discussion of the reforms can be found in Lewis, P. G., ‘Political Consequences of the Changes in Party/State Structure under Gierek’, in Woodall, J., ed., Policy and Politics in Contemporary Poland (London: Frances Pinter, forthcoming 1982).Google Scholar

25 Macierewicz, A., ‘Walka o prawa obywatelskie’, Głos (Paris: Kultura, 1980), p. 131.Google Scholar

26 Kuron, J., Zasady ideowe (Paris: Kultura, 1978), p. 29.Google Scholar

27 Guardian, 13 08 1980.Google Scholar

28 Statement by the Prime Minister in Nowe Drogi (04 1980), p. 27.Google Scholar

29 Rocznik Statystyczny (1979), p. 77.Google Scholar

30 Mały Rocznik Statystyczny (1981), p. 56.Google Scholar

31 Wieś Współczesna (08 1980), pp. 34.Google Scholar

32 Nowe Drogi (06 1980), p. 142.Google Scholar

33 Raport o stanie narodu i PRL (Paris: Kultura, 1980), p. 52.Google Scholar

34 Polityka, 4 10 1980.Google Scholar

35 With some prescience ‘a certain degree of intoxication’ had been detected eight years earlier by Bromke, A., ‘Poland under Gierek: a New Political Style’, Problems of Communism, XXI (1972), 119, p. 19.Google Scholar

36 Nowe Drogi (10/11 1980), p. 46.Google Scholar

37 Polityka, 18 10 1980.Google Scholar

38 Polityka, 18 10 1980.Google Scholar

39 Connor, W., ‘Dissent in Eastern Europe’, Problems of Communism, XXIX (1980), 117, p. 14.Google Scholar

40 Tarniewski, M., Ewolucja czy rewolucja (Paris: Kultura, 1975), pp. 274–5.Google Scholar

41 Polityka, 13 09 1980.Google Scholar The survey findings are also discussed in European Political Data Newsletter, No. 37.

42 Kultura (Warsaw), 22 03 1981.Google Scholar

43 Le Matin, 22 06 1981.Google Scholar

44 Nowe Drogi (12 1980), p. 13.Google Scholar

45 Polityka, 2 05 1981.Google Scholar

46 Polityka, 17 01 1981.Google Scholar

47 Polityka, 7 03 1981.Google Scholar

48 Życie Partii (11 1980), p. 21.Google Scholar

49 Polityka, 14 03 1981.Google Scholar

50 Nowe Drogi (01/02 1981), p. 92.Google Scholar

51 Polityka, 21 03 1981.Google Scholar

52 Polityka, 28 03 1981.Google Scholar

53 Polityka, 4 04 1981.Google Scholar