Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T11:06:35.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Joining Interest Groups: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Extract

Following the exchange between Shackleton and Marsh on the work of Olson and its applicability to the case of the Confederation of British Industry, I wish to criticize some of Shackleton's points and develop some of those made by Marsh. I intend to ignore some of Shackleton's criticisms of the methodology Marsh and I employed in our book (for example, our use of semi-structured interviews, a respectable technique in elite interviewing) and instead to concentrate on substantive questions of more general interest.

Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shackleton, J. R., ‘Dr Marsh on Olson: a Comment’, British Journal of Political Science, VIII (1978), 375–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Marsh, David, ‘More on Joining Interest Groups’, British Journal of Political Science, VIII (1978), 380–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Shackleton, , ‘Dr Marsh on Olson’, pp. 376 and 380.Google Scholar

3 Grant, W. and Marsh, D., The Confederation of British Industry (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1977), Chap. 2.Google Scholar

4 Shackleton, , ‘Dr Marsh on Olson’, p. 379.Google Scholar

5 Marsh, , ‘More on Joining Interest Groups’, p. 384.Google Scholar

6 Elliott, John, Industrial Editor of the Financial Times, writing in the issue of 4 05 1978.Google Scholar

7 Financial Times, 6 12 1977.Google Scholar

8 Financial Times, 4 05 1978.Google Scholar

9 See Marsh, 's discussion, ‘More on Joining Interest Groups’, p. 384.Google Scholar