Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:57:59.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1.2 Sociological implications of intensifying animal production in developing countries: the case of the african pastoralists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. R. Baker
P. R. Baker
Affiliation:
School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR86BA.
Get access

Extract

In the early part of the last decade the World Bank identified the livestock sector as the principal area for investment in several countries in Africa, upon which continent this paper concentrates. Since that time very considerable amounts of time and scarce development capital have been directed into improving and “modernising” the production and marketing of, particularly, cattle from the traditional sector. However, the success rate of projects has been extremely low, leading one writer to comment: “There are few fields of economic development characterized by greater or more destructive blunders than those involving attempts to improve the productivity of grazing lands and the animals depending on them” (Dasmann, Milton and Freeman, 1973).

Type
General Considerations
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 4: Intensive Animal Production in Developing Countries , January 1981 , pp. 11 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, F. D. 1975. A sectoral approach to the cattle industry in West Africa. Development Digest 13: No. 2, 70–81Google Scholar
Baker, P. R. 1976. The social importance of cattle in Africa and the influence of social attitudes on beef production. In Beef Cattle Production in Developing Countries (ed. Smith, A. J.), pp. 360–375, Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Baldus, R. D. 1978. The introduction of cooperative livestock husbandry in Tanzania. Land Reform 2: 37–47.Google Scholar
Brown, R. H. 1977. The ecology of man and domestic livestock. In Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa (ed. Pratt, D. J. and Gwynne, M. J.), pp. 34–40, Hodder and Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
Cunnison, I. 1960. The social role of cattle. Sudan J. vet. Sci. 1: No. 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cunnison, I. 1967. Nomads and the Nineteen-Sixties. University of Hull.Google Scholar
Dasmann, R. F., Milton, J. P. and Freeman, P. H. 1973. Ecological principles for economic development. John Wiley and Sons, London.Google Scholar
Davies, H. R. J. 1966. Nomadism in the Sudan. Tijdschrift voor Econ. en Soc. Geografie 57: 193–202.Google Scholar
Dahl, G. and Hjort, A. 1976. Having Herds. Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, No. 2, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Dyson—Hudson, N. and R. 1970. The food production system of a semi-nomadic society. In African Food Production Systems, Cases and Theory (ed. P., McLoughlin) pp. 91–123, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
FAO. 1967. East African Livestock Survey.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. S. 1967. The Nigerian Beef Industry. Cornell Int. Agric. Dev. Bull. No. 9, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Fielder, R. J. 1973. The role of cattle in the Ila economy. African Social Research 15: 327–361.Google Scholar
Haaland, G. 1976. Animal husbandry, migratory and sedentary populations. Technical Paper No. 1, International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Haaland, G. 1977. Pastoral systems of production: the socio-cultural context and some economic and ecological implications. In Land Use and Development (ed. P., O'Keefe and B., Wisner) pp. 179–194, International African Institute, London.Google Scholar
Herskovitz, M. J. 1926. The Cattle Complex in East Africa. American Anthropology 28: 230–272, 361–380,494–528 and 633–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, C. and Cohen, R. 1975. African peasants and resistance to change: a reconsideration of sociological approaches. In Beyond the Sociology of Development (ed. D., Booth, A., Barnett and I., Oxaal), pp. 105–130, Routledge and Keegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. and Simpson, M. 1972. Perverse supply in nomadic societies. Oxford Agrarian Studies 1: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, I. M. 1975. The dynamics of nomadism: Prospects for sedentarisation and social change. In Pastoralism in Tropical Africa (ed. T., Monod), pp. 426–439. O.U.P. for the International African Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, K. L. 1953. Social change in a non-literate community. In Approaches to Community Development (ed. P., Ruopp), pp. 87–89, van Hoeve, The Hague.Google Scholar
Lutke—Entrup, J. 1971. Limitations and possibilities of increasing market production of peasant African cattle holders in Western Province, Zambia. Inst. for African Studies Communication No. 7, University of Zambia, Lusaka.Google Scholar
Ole Parkipuny, M. S. 1977. Some Crucial Aspects of the Maasai Predicament, unpublished manuscript, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.Google Scholar
Pratt, D. J. and Gwynne, M. D. 1977. Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa. Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sandford, S. 1976. Pastoralism under pressure, O.D.I. Review 2: 45–68.Google Scholar
Sandford, S. 1977. A planner's needs for anthropological data. Paper pesented to I.L.C.A. workshop,Nairobi.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. 1964. A model of African indigenous economy and society. Comp. Studies in Society and History 7: No. 1, 37–55, Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, H. 1974. Economic development and economic change: the case of East African cattle. Current Anthropology 15: No. 3, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørbø, G. 1976. Nomads on the Scheme, mimeo, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1979. Trends in research and the application of science and technology for arid zone development. M.A.B. Technical Notes 10, Paris.Google Scholar