Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T07:20:41.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of group size on proximity relations in pre weaned foals kept in a commercial stud environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

E J Done
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, U.K., Email: h.randle@plymouth.ac.uk
H Randle
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, U.K., Email: h.randle@plymouth.ac.uk
T Counsell
Affiliation:
Duchy College, Stoke Climsland, Callington, Cornwall PL17 8PBU.K., Email: t.counsell@cornwall.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

The Stud Book Returns of racehorse breeders to Weatherbys Group Ltd. in 2003 recorded 16,008 live foals in England, Scotland, Wales, the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland; the same organization estimates the U.K. racehorse population to be 40,000 (Defra, 2004). The link between diminished equine well-being and social isolation (where physical segregation from conspecifics is regarded as preventing the expression of instinctive social behaviour) is well documented (e.g. Fraser, 1992, ). The negative consequences of social deprivation during the primary socialization period have been studied in adult equines; these include fear responses when presented with novel stimuli, generalized fear-induced aggression and stereotypic behaviours (Fraser, 1992, ; McGreevy et al., 1995b, . The manifestation of ‘a normal behavioural repertoire’ is widely viewed as an indication of well-being (Hurnik et al., 1985, ). The acquisition of typical equine behaviour occurs in a socialization period that involves close contact with conspecifics (e.g. identification through olfactory investigation and reciprocal maintenance behaviours such as allo-grooming).

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Key references

D.E.F.R.A. (2004) A report of research on the horse industry in Great Britain. [WWW] http://www.defra.gov.uk (24/04/2005).Google Scholar
Feh, C., 2005. Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds. In: The Domestic Horse: The Evolution, Development and Management of its Behaviour. [ed.s] Mills, D. and McDonnell, S., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 8393.Google Scholar
Fraser, A.F., 1992. The Behaviour of the Horse. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, England. 105; 227231.Google Scholar
Hurnik, J.F., Webster, A.B. and Siegel, P.B., 1985. Dictionary of Farm Animal Behaviour. University of Guelph, Ontario. 176.Google Scholar
McGreevy, P.D., Cripps, P.J., French, N.P., Green, L.E., Nicol, C.J., 1995b. Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred horse. Equine Veterinary Journal, 27: 8691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, B. 2002. Neonatal foal handling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78 (2-4): 303317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar