Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T10:27:43.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upland sheep production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

T. J. Maxwell ,
Mary D. Lloyd  and
I. A. Dickson
T. J. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Mary D. Lloyd
Affiliation:
East of Scotland College of Agriculture, APAD, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QE
I. A. Dickson
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Pathfoot Building, Stirling University, Stirling FK9 4LA
Get access

Abstract

Upland sheep production systems based on the utilisation of enclosed sown pastures are considered in relation to environmental constraints, recent trends in marketing requirements and a continuing need to improve economic efficiency. The need for quantitatively described decision making in relation to both the testing, development and application of new technology is discussed with particular reference to those factors influencing herbage growth, utilisation and management.

Relatively few upland farms are capable of producing marketable fat lambs before the decline in returns per kg lamb in June. Although higher returns for heavier fat or store lambs can be obtained in the autumn, the degree to which this maximizes the returns per ha will be dependent upon the stocking rate and ewe and lamb performance during the summer. It will also be dependent on the extent to which there is competition for pasture in the autumn and its effect on ewe live weight and condition during the pre-mating and post-mating period; weight and condition will affect reproductive performance which has a substantial effect on returns per ha.

The significance of sward height as a means of controlling the performance of sheep grazing sown pastures is reviewed in relation to ongoing and completed systems experiments and development projects. It is concluded that, for practical purposes, a sward height held between 3.5 and 5.5 cm will provide a sound basis for management of the lactating ewe and suckling lamb until weaning. The means of achieving sward height control in varying farming situations and the development of commercially viable management systems is considered.

In the development of systems towards improving production efficiency, a better description of responses to both level and pattern of N used is required. The need for a better understanding of responses of the ewe in terms of ovulation rate and embryo wastage to changing sward characteristics in the autumn and to the use of supplementary feeding is also required. New techniques, such as the endocrine manipulation of reproductive performance, need to be assessed in relation to existing practices and performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 10: Hill and Upland Livestock Production , 1985 , pp. 95 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, M. B., Harvey, A. and Clark, H. 1985. Sward height for efficiency. Second Annual Welsh Agricultural R&D Conference, Bangor. In press.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. 1981. Herbage Growth and Utilisation under Continuous Management. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. and Hodgson, J. 1983. The influence of sward condition on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards under continuous stocking. Grass and Forage Sci. 38: 323–331.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Milne, J. A., Lamb, C. S., McCormack, H. A. and Spence, A. M. 1984. The effect of supplementation on non-ammonia nitrogen flows at the abomasum of lactating grazing ewes. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 44: 63A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Grant, S. A., and King, J. 1983. Grazing management and pasture production: the importance of sward morphological adaptations and canopy photosynthesis. HFRO Biennial Report, 1982-83. pp. 119-129.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. J., Doney, J. M., Milne, J. A., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Sibbald, A. R. and Macdonald, D. 1979. The effect of rearing type and prepartum nutrition on the intake and performance of lactating Greyfacc ewes at pasture. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 165–174.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. and Souter, W. 1981. Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Anim. Prod. 32: 185–195.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J., Agnew, R. D. M. and Sibbald, A. R. 1982. Effect of supplementary feeding in early lactation and herbage mass on the performance of ewes and lambs. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. 34: 385 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., MORRIS. B. A., Leslie, I. D., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1985. Effect of passive immunisation against testosterone on conception, ovulation and lambing rates of Scottish Blackface ewes in different levels of body condition at mating. Anim. Prod. (Abstr.), In press.Google Scholar
Scaramuzzi, R. J. and Hoskinson, R. M. 1983. Active Immunisation against Steroid Hormones for Immunising Fecundity. 38th Nottingham Easter School, 445–474.Google Scholar
Sibbald, A. R., Gunn, R. G., Maxwell, T. J., Agnew, R. D. M. and Macfarlane, D. N. 1984. A model of pasture utilisation and ewe performance at mating in an upland flock. Anim. Prod. 38: 559 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Webb, R., Land, R. B., Patheraja, N. and Morris, B. A. 1983. Passive Immunisation Against Steroid Hormones in the Female. 38th Nottingham Easier School, 475–500.Google Scholar