Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T22:20:08.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare considerations in future selection and management strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. J. F. Webster
A. J. F. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
Get access

Abstract

This paper considers the welfare implications of breeding, feeding and managing dairy cows for increased productivity. The physiological demands of lactation for the high genetic merit dairy cow are exceptional, less in their intensity and more in their duration. Most welfare problems can be attributed less to productivity per se than to systems of feeding, milking and management that are unsuitable to the genotype of the high yielding cow. These include the inadequacies of wet grass silage as a staple food and the abnormal restriction of cows to twice-daily milking. It is also necessary to consider welfare problems that may arise from the application of new technologies to increase milk yield or to increase the rate of genetic progress. These may be related to the process itself or to its consequences. It is proposed that the commercial exploitation of these new technologies should be controlled by legislation similar to that for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes which applies a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether the cost to the animal can be justified in terms of any potential benefit to society.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 19: Breeding and Feeding the High Genetic Merit Dairy Cow , 1995 , pp. 87 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burton, J. L., McBride, B. W., Block, E., Glimm, D. R. and Kennelly, J. J. 1994. A review of bovine growth hormone. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74:167–202.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y. 1989. Long-term effects of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) on dairy cow performance: a review. In Use of somatotropin in livestock production (ed. Sejrsen, K., Vestergaard, M., Niemann-Sorenson, A. J.), pp. 61–87. Elsevier Applied Sciences, London.Google Scholar
Emanuelson, U. 1987. Genetic studies on the epidemiology of mastitis in dairy cattle. Rapport Institutionen for Husdjursforadling och Sjukdomsgenetik, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, no. 73.Google Scholar
Hillerton, J. E. 1991. The effects of milking frequency on mastitis. Proceedings of the British mastitis conference, Stoneleigh, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
Ipema, A. H., Lippus, A. C., Metz, J. H. M. and Rossing, W., eds. 1992. Prospects for automatic milking. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Kempson, S. A. and Logue, D. N. 1993. Ultrastructural observations of hoof horn from dairy cows: changes in the white line during the first lactation. Veterinary Record 132: 524–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestin, S. C., Knowles, T. G., Tinch, A. E. and Gregory, N. G. 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 191–194.Google Scholar
Knight, C. H. and Dewhurst, R. J. 1995. Udder characteristics and relationship to efficiency of milk production. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow, British Society of Animal Science, occasional publication, no. 19, pp. 79–85.Google Scholar
MacFarland, D. 1989. Problems of animal behaviour. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
Mclnemy, J. 1991. A socioeconomic perspective on animal welfare. Outlook on Agriculture 20: 51–56.Google Scholar
Morse, D., Delorenzo, M. A., Wilcox, C. J., Natzke, R. P. and Bray, D. R. 1987. Occurrence and reoccurrence of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 2168–2175.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1992. Energy expenditure, studies with animals. In The contribution of nutrition to human and animal health (ed. Widdowson, E. M. and Mathers, J. C.), pp. 23–32. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1993. Understanding the dairy cow, 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific, London.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1995. New breeding technologies; ethical and animal welfare issues. British Cattle Breeders Club Digest 49: 41–44.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Wilmut, I. 1989. Embryo manipulation in cattle breeding and production. Animal Production 48:3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar