Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T05:31:02.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animal awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

K. M. Kendrick*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
Get access

Abstract

The problem of demonstrating that animals are consciously aware of their environment or themselves in a similar manner to ourselves has proved to be a relatively intractable one since we have mainly been constrained to rely upon observation of an animal’s behaviour as an index of its awareness. It can usually be argued that even complex behaviours need not necessarily involve an animal being aware of either environmental cues or its response to them. Indeed, simple organisms or computers can perform complex responses to environmental cues when they are clearly not aware of them in the sense that we are ourselves. What can particularly distinguish conscious awareness from simple stimulus-response guided behaviour is the ability of an animal to experience some form of emotional response to an environmental cue or to its own actions. In this review I will summarize some of our experiments on sheep which show that the way their brains process visual and olfactory social and non-social cues from the environment is integrally related to and organized by the emotional significance of what is perceived. I will also argue that the way their brains process complex social stimuli from the environment in order to recognize individuals is very similar to ourselves although these processes are very strongly influenced by changes in their motivational state. From these observations I will maintain that sheep are almost certainly capable of conscious awareness of their environment although perhaps this awareness is mainly restricted to present events and needs with a limited capacity to reflect on the past or future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backhaus, D. 1959. Visual acuity in ungulates. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 16: 454.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. A. 1981. Shape discrimination in sheep and calves. Animal Behaviour 29: 830834.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. A., McLaughlin, C. L. and Baile, C. A. 1977. The effect of ablation of the olfactory bulbs on feeding behaviour in sheep. Applied Animal Ethology 3: 151161.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. A. and Meese, G. B. 1977. The ability of sheep to distinguish between conspecifics by means of olfaction. Physiology and Behavior 18: 803808.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. A. and Parrott, R. F. 1982. Self-stimulation in the sheep: interactions with ingestive behaviour and light cycle. Physiology and Behavior 28: 7781.Google Scholar
Bazely, D. R. 1981. Foraging behaviour of sheep (Ovis aries) grazing on swards of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) . Doctoral thesis. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Burton, M. J., Rolls, E. T. and Mora, F. 1976. Effects of hunger on the responses of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus to the sight and taste of food. Experimental Neurology 51: 668677.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. 1993. A formal notation to aid analysis of complex behaviour — understanding the tactical deception of primates. Behaviour 127: 231246.Google Scholar
Crick, F. and Koch, C. 1990. Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences 2: 263275.Google Scholar
Farah, M. J. 1995. Current issues in the neuropsychology of image generation. Neuropsychologia 33: 14551471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, G. G. 1970. Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science 167: 8687.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G. 1982. Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology 3: 341343.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Povinelli, D. J., Suarez, S. D., Anderson, J. R-, Lethmate, J. and Menzel, E. W. 1995. Further reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour 50: 15251532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V. 1971. Mountain sheep: a study in behaviour and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar
Grattan, L. M., Eslinger, P. J., Mattson, K. E., Rigamonti, D. and Price, T. 1994. Altered social self-awareness — empirical-evidence for frontal-lobe specialization for social self-knowledge. Neurology 44: 292.Google Scholar
Green, G. C., Elwin, R. L., Mottershead, B. E., Keogh, R. G. and Lynch, J. J. 1984. Long-term effects of early experience to supplementary feeding in sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 27: 201207.Google Scholar
Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E. and Bender, D. B. 1972. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology 35: 96111.Google Scholar
Hess, J., Novak, M. A. and Povinelli, D. J. 1993. Natural pointing in a rhesus monkey, but no evidence of empathy. Animal Behaviour 46: 10231025.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. 1994. Reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour 47: 909919.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. 1995. Self-recognition in primates: further reflections create a hall of mirrors. Animal Behaviour 50: 15331542.Google Scholar
James, W. 1879. Are we automata? Mind 4: 122.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. 1990a. Neural processing of visual recognition of individuals in sheep. In Social stress in domestic animals (ed. Zayan, R. and Dantzer, D.), pp. 145156. Kluwer Academic Publications, no. 53.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. 1990b. Through a sheep’s eye. New Scientist, 12 May, pp. 6265.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. 1991. How the sheep’s brain controls the visual recognition of animals and humans. Journal of Animal Science 69: 50085016.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. 1992. Cognition. In Farm animals and the environment (ed. Phillips, C. and Piggins, D.), pp. 209231. CAB International, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. 1996. Neural control of social and object recognition in sheep. Proceedings of the XXVII SFECA conference ‘L’Individue et son Monde Social’ (ed. Boissy, A., Trillat, G. and Veissier, I.), pp. 101121. INRA, Clermond-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M., Atkins, K., Hinton, M. R., Heavens, P. and Keverne, E. B. 1996. Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and symbol discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity. Behavioural Processes 38: 1935.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. and Baldwin, B. A. 1986. The activity of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and zona incerta of the sheep responding to the sight or approach of food is modified by learning and satiety and reflects food preference. Brain Research 375: 320328.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. and Baldwin, B. A. 1987. Cells in temporal cortex of conscious sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces. Science 236: 448450.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. and Baldwin, B. A. 1989. The effects of sodium appetite on the responses of cells in the zona incerta to the sight or ingestion of food, salt and water in sheep. Brain Research 492: 211218.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M., Hinton, M. R., Atkins, K. and Keverne, E. B. 1995. Facial discrimination in sheep. Animal Behaviour 49: 16651676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. M., Levy, F. and Keverne, E. B. 1992. Changes in the sensory processing of olfactory signals induced by birth in sheep. Science 256: 833836.Google Scholar
Koizuka, I., Yano, H., Nagahara, M., Mochizuki, R., Seo, R., Shimada, K., Kubo, T. and Nogawa, T. 1994. Functional imaging of the human olfactory cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 56: 273275.Google Scholar
Le Bihan, D., Turner, R., Zeffiro, T. A., Cuénod, C. A., Jezzard, P. and Bonnerot, V. 1993. Activation of human primary visual cortex during visual recall: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 1180211805.Google Scholar
Marten, K. and Psarakos, S. 1995. Using self-view television to distinguish between self-examination and social behavior in the bottle-nose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) . Consciousness and Cognition 4: 205224.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. W. 1993. Mental models of mirror-self-recognition: two theories. New Ideas in Psychology 11: 295325.Google Scholar
Mora, F., Rolls, E. T. and Burton, M. J. 1976. Modulation during learning of neurons in the lateral hypothalamus to the sight of food. Experimental Neurology 53: 508519.Google Scholar
O’Connell, S. M. 1995. Empathy in chimpanzees: evidence for theory of mind. Primates 36: 397410.Google Scholar
Ohkura, S., Fabre-Nys, C., Broad, K. D. and Kendnek, K. M. 1995. Differential effects on brain c-fos expression in oestrus and anoestrus sheep exposed to males. Fourth IBRO world congress of neuroscience, Kyoto, Japan, p. 452.Google Scholar
Parrott, R. F., Houpt, K. A., Misson, B. H. 1988. Modifications of the responses of sheep to isolation stress by the use of mirror panels. Applied Animal Behavior Science 19: 331338.Google Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W. and Benson, P. J. 1992. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B 335: 2330.Google Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J. and Chitty, A. J. 1987. Visual neurones responsive to faces. Trends in Neuroscience 10: 358364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., Chitty, A. J., Smith, P. A. J., Potter, D. D., Broennimann, R. and Harries, M. 1988. Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: evidence from single unit and reaction time studies. Behavioural Brain Research 29: 245258.Google Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T. and Caan, W. 1982. Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 47: 329342.Google Scholar
Piggins, D. 1992. Visual perception. In Farm animals and the environment (ed. Phillips, C. and Piggins, D.), pp.131158. CAB International, Oxford.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., Nelson, K. E. and Boysen, S. T. 1992a. Comprehension of social role reversal by chimpanzees: evidence for empathy? Animal Behaviour 43: 633640.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., Parks, K. A. and Novak, M. A. 1992b. Role reversal in rhesus monkeys, but no evidence of empathy. Animal Behaviour 44: 269281.Google Scholar
Reber, A. 1996. Dictionary of psychology. Penguin, London.Google Scholar
Rolls, E. T., Burton, M. J. and Mora, F. 1976. Hypothalamic neuronal responses associated with the sight of food. Brain Research 111: 5367.Google Scholar
Rolls, E. T., Burton, M. J. and Mora, F. 1980. Neurophysiological analysis of brain-stimulation reward in the monkey. Brain Research 194: 339357.Google Scholar
Sergent, J. and Signoret, J. L. 1992. Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal patients. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B Biological Sciences 335: 5561.Google Scholar
Young, A. 1994. In Consciousness in philosophy and cognitive neuroscience (ed. Revonsuo, A. and Kampinen, M.). LEA Hillside, NT. Google Scholar