Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T05:05:14.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current pig production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Woodthorne, Wolverhampton
Get access

Abstract

Current pig production systems reflect management decisions taken over a period of many years. The range of constraints on pig producers has grown rapidly and priorities are in the process of change. On the basis of the available evidence, the following conclusions may be made.

Less than half the pig breeding enterprises in the United Kingdom use sow housing which involves individual confinement and more than half provide dry sows with bedding. At present, there is a strong current interest in group housing systems.

In the parturition and lactating stages, farrowing crates are used in the vast majority of herds and the main current practical interest is in improving crate and pen design and husbandry techniques to assist in minimizing piglet mortality.

Less than half of the herds use fully slatted accommodation for newly weaned pigs and nearly one-third provide bedding. In the follow-on stage, less than one-fifth of herds use fully slatted floors and ‘fully controlled environment’ type accommodation.

There is strong current interest in fully slatted finishing housing but so far less than one-tenth of herds use it. Nearly two-thirds of herds use finisher houses which are not in the ‘controlled environment’ category.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural development and advisory service. 1984. Pig production and welfare. Booklet No. 2483. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of agriculture, fisheries and food. 1980, 1985, 1986. June Census. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Meat and livestock commission. 1986. Pig management survey. Pig Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ridgeon, R. F. 1985. Pig management scheme results. Economic Report, Agricultural Economics Unit, University of Cambridge, No. 96.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. B., Laird, R., Hall, J. K. S., Forsyth, R. J., Thompson, J. M. and Walker-Love, J. 1966. A comparison of two indoor farrowing systems for sows. Animal Production 8: 171178.Google Scholar
Terrington, EHF. 1973. Comparison of different systems of housing sows and litters. Terrington Experimental Husbandry Farm. 14th Annual Review.Google Scholar