Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T01:19:26.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploiting dietary fibre in equid diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Meriel J. S. Moore–Colyer
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Llanbadarn Fawr, Aberystwyth, SY 23 3 AL Wales UK
Annette Longland
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY 23 3EB, Wales, UK
Get access

Abstract

Four in vivo apparent digestibility trials were carried out over a period of two years using 4 to 6 Welsh cross pony geldings of approximately 300kg LW. In all experiments ponies were individually housed in 10x12 ft loose–boxes with rubber mat flooring. In Experiment 1 three diets were offered ad libitum to 6 ponies in a replicate 3 x 3 Latin squares design. In Experiments 2, 3 & 4, four ponies were offered 1.5 – 1.75 % of LW per day in dry matter (DM) in 4 x 4 Latin square changeover designs. In all experiments periods lasted for 21 days, a 16-day adaptation period followed by a 5-day data collection phase. Diets were fed in two equal meals per day and water was available ad libitum. Dried feed and faecal samples were analysed for DM, ADF, NDF and CP using the methods of the AOAC (1990), GE was determined via bomb calorimetry and non–starch polysaccharides (NSP) were quantified by the method of Englyst and Cummings (1984). Differences between diets were determined by analysis of variance (Genstat 5, 2000). NSP analysis gave detailed information on the individual fibre constituents and allowed the subtle differences between feeds to be identified. The DMI of grass and red clover silages were 0.6 and 1.7 kg/d greater than hay indicating that the low DM content of these two forages does not negatively affect feed intake. The apparent digestibilities of these two feeds were also significantly greater than hay for all parameters measured. In Experiment 2 the combination diets of alfa-beet and hay (AB:H) and sugar beet and hay (SB:H) fed in 60:40 and 70:30 ratios were all significantly more digested at > 50% than the hay only diet at <39% for DM, CP, NDF, ADF, NSP, Ca, P and Mg. The addition of AB to H in the 70:30 diet produced a DE value of 2.89 MJ/kg DM higher than the hay alone only diet and also caused an associative affect which improved the digestibility of CP, arabinose, galactose and uronic acids from the hay portion of the diet. No significant differences were noted between the digestibilities of the proximate constituents for the chopped hay replacer (CHR), CHR and highly digestible fibre (HDF) cubes and CHR and course mix (CM) fed in Experiment 3. When looking at the digestibilities of the individual NSP constituents the CHR : CM diet was generally less digestible than the CHR: HDF diets indicating that HDF cubes are equally well or more digestible than a diet containing conventional course mix. With DE values similar to the CM the HDF feed can be offered as a valuable alternative to concentrates in equid diets. The high fibre forage (HiFi) fed in Experiment 4 was also highly digestible for all constituents measured and showed that a combination of chopped straw and alfalfa makes an excellent fibre feed for horses. The results from the four experiments reported here show that detailed chemical analysis is extremely valuable when choosing complimentary fibre feeds for horses. Moreover all the fibre feeds examined here were more digestible than hay. Feeds like the HDF cubes can be used to replace some or all of the cereal portion of the diet. The associative effects between the alfa-beet and hay and the mineral digestibility from these alternative feeds also suggests that not only is gut health enhanced, but that the supply of nutrients from these feeds makes them ideal choices for stabled horses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, G.E., Potter, G.D., Conrad, B.E. and Evans, J.W. (1989). Voluntary intake and digestion of Coastal Bermuda grass hay by yearling and mature horses. Equine Veterinary Science. 9: 262264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aman, P. and Graham, H. (1990). Chemical evaluation of polysaccharides in animal foods. In: Foodstuff Evaluation Edited by Wiseman, J. and Cole, D.J.. Butterworths, London, UK. pp. 161178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition. Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Baker, M.S., Topliff, D.R., Freeman, D.W., Teeter, R.G., Breazile, J.E. (1992). Effects of dietary cation–anion balance on acid–base status in horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 12: 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.S., Wall, D.L., Topliff, D.R., Freeman, D.W., Teeter, R.G., Breazile, J.E. and Wagner, D.G. (1993). Effect of dietary cationanion balance in anaerobically exercised and sedentary horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 10: 557561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.S., Topliff, D.R., Freeman, D.W., Teeter, R.G., Stoecker, B. (1997). Comparison of two forms of sodium in the dietary cationanion difference equation: Effects on mineral balance in sedentary horses. Proceedings of the 15th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium. Ft Worth, Texas, USA. ENPS, Savoy, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Birch, G.G. and Parker, K.J. (1983). Dietary Fibre. Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London and New York.Google Scholar
Butler, G.W. and Bailey, R.W. (1973). Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage, Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Cooper, S.R., Kline, K.H., Foremann, J.H., Brady, H.A. and Frey, L.P. (1998). Effects of dietary cation–anion balance on pH, electrolytes and lactate in standard bred horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 18: 662666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croizer, J.A, Allen, V.G., Jack, N.E., Fontenot, J.P. and Cochrane, M.A. (1997). Digestibility, apparent mineral absorption and voluntary intake by horses fed Alfalfa, Tall Fescue and Caucasian Bluestem. Journal of Animal Science. 75: 16511658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cymbaluk, N.F. (1990). Comparison of forage digestion by cattle and horses. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 70: 601610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englyst, H.N. and Cummings, J.H. (1984). Simplified method for the measurement of total non–starch polysaccharides by gas–liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates, Analyst. 109: 937942.Google Scholar
Frape, D. (1986). Equine Nutrition and Feeding, Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Gillham, S.B., Dobman, N.D., Shuster, L., Kream, R. and Rand, W. (1994). The effect of diets on cribbing behaviour and plasma ß endorphin in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 41: 147153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinsky, M.J., Smith, R.M., Spires, H.R. and Davis, C.L. (1976). Measurements of volatile fatty acid production rates in the caecum of the pony. Journal of Animal Science. 42: 14651470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, D., Davidson, H.P.B. and Harris, P. (2002). Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Veterinary Journal. 34: 686691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodson, J., Tyznik, W.J., Cline, J..H. and Dehority, B.A. (1988). Effects of an abrupt diet change from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical environment in the caecum of the pony. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 54: 19461950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, C. and Moore–Colyer, M.J.S. (2001). Voluntary food intakes and apparent digestibilities of hay, big–bale grass silage and red clover silage by ponies. Proceedings of the 17th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Society, Lexington, Kentucky, June 2001. ENPS, Savoy, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Laws Agricultural Trust (1993). Genstat 5, Rothamstead Experimental Station, Harpendon, Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Lawrence, L., (1994). Practical considerations in equine sports medicine. In: The Athletic Horse Edited by Hodgson, D.R. and Rose, R.J.. W.B. Saunders and Co., Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
Longland, A.C., Carruthers, J.C. and Low, A.G. (1994). The ability of piglets 4-8 weeks old to digest and perform on diets containing two contrasting sources of non–starch polysaccharide. Animal Production. 58: 405410.Google Scholar
McCall, C.A. (1993). Solving behaviour problems in horses. Equine Practice. 15: (8) 3031.Google Scholar
McDonald, M., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D. and Morgan, C. (1995). Animal Nutrition. 5th edition, Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, UK.Google Scholar
Martin–Rosset, W. and Dulphy, J.P. (1987). Digestibility interactions between forages and concentrates in horses: Influence of feeding level – comparison with sheep. Livestock Production Science. 17: 263276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore–Colyer, M.J.S., Hyslop, J.J., Longland, A.C. and Cuddeford, D. (2000). Intra–caecal fermentation parameters in ponies fed botanically diverse fibre feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 84: 183197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore–Colyer, M.J.S. and Longland, A.C.L. (2000). In vivo apparent digestibility of four types of conserved forage by ponies. Animal Science. 71: 527534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore–Colyer, M.J.S. (2000). Studies on the degradation kinetics of botanically diverse fibrous feeds and their apparent digestibility and rate of passage when fed to ponies. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Moore–Colyer, M.J.S. (2001). The effect of plain sugar beet pulp on the in vitro gas production and in vivo apparent digestibility of hay when offered to ponies. Proceedings of the 17th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium June 2001, Lexington, KY, USA. ENPS, Savoy, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Moore–Colyer, MJ.S., Hyslop, J.J., Longland, A.C. and Cuddeford, D. (2002). The mobile bag technique as a method for determining the degradation of four botanically diverse fibrous feedstuffs in the small intestine and total digestive tract of ponies. British Journal of Nutrition. 88: 729740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore–Colyer, M.J.S; Morrow, H.J. and Longland, A.C. (2003). Mathematical modelling of digesta passage rate, mean retention time and in vivo apparent digestibility of two different lengths of hay and big–bale grass silage in ponies. British Journal of Nutrition. 90: 109118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, R.A. and Merritt, J.B. (1991). Intake, digestion and gastrointestinal transit time in resting donkeys and ponies and exercised donkeys given ad libitum hay and straw diets. Equine Veterinary Journal. 23: 339343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, G.J.S. (1997). Carbohydrate Metabolism: Structural Carbohydrates. In: Plant Biochemistry, Edited by Dey, P.M. and Harborne, J.B.. Academic Press. London, UK. pp. 205235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Noot, G.W. and Gilbreath, E.B. (1970). Comparative digestibility of forages by geldings and steers. Journal of Animal Science. 31: 351355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, D.L., Topliff, D.R., Freeman, D.W., Wagner, D.G. and Breazile, J.E. (1992). Effects of dietary cation–anion balance on urinary mineral excretion in exercised horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 12: 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, D.L., Topliff, D.R., Freeman, D.W., Breazile, J.E. and Teter, R.G. (1997). The effect of dietary cation–anion balance on mineral balance in growing horses. Proceedings of the 15th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium. Ft Worth, Texas, USA. ENPS, Savoy, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Wolter, R. (1993). Fibre in the feeding of horses. Practique Veterinaire Equine. 53: 321325.Google Scholar