Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T22:53:35.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of by-products in animal feeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

P. N. Wilson*
Affiliation:
BOCM Silcock, Basingstoke, Hants
Get access

Extract

Over the last 30 years there has been spectacular growth in the UK broiler industry (Richardson, 1976), intensification in the UK pig industry and a move to larger herds and higher yields in the cattle industry. These trends have meant that farmers have bought more livestock feed both as compounds and as straights. Parallel to these changes, the move from ‘target’ to ‘least cost’ formulation by the compounder and computerized home mixer has increased the ability to deal with different raw materials and to utilize these successfully in compounded diets (Wilson, 1975).

In spite of all these technical advances, livestock still depend on large quantities of cereals and other raw materials which are potential food for man (Wilson, 1977) as illustrated in Table 1. This is in spite of the fact that, over the past 15 years, the general trend-line in the ‘carry over’ stocks of world grain has been downwards (Brown, 1977). It follows that, in considering future feeding policies for livestock, there are good reasons why prudent steps should be taken to find and utilize alternative sources of both energy and protein for animal feeds. Holland has been more successful in this respect than the UK (De Boer, 1978) as instanced by the increasing imports of cassava which in part replaces European-grown barley and wheat (Walters, 1978).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, L. R. 1977. The world food prospects. Long range Planning 10: 2634.Google Scholar
De Boer, F. 1978. Food waste disposal in Dutch livestock husbandry Food for Thought—the recovery and re- use of food wastes. London, 1978.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. I. S. 1976. The United Kingdom Broiler Industry 1960-1975. Production, marketing and consumption. University of Manchester Dept. Agric. Econ. Agricultural Enterprise Studies in England and Wales, No. 42.Google Scholar
Robb, J. 1976. Alternatives to conventional cereals. In Feed Energy Sources for Livestock (ed. Swa, H. and Lewis, D.) pp. 1329. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
UKASTA, 1978. Did you know? Facts and Figures about the UK Compound Animal Feedingstuffs Industry, London, 1978.Google Scholar
Walters, P. 1978. Manioc poised for major UK compound role? agri Trade 06, 1978, 20-22 and 62.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. 1975. The compound industry in animal production. Span 18: 117118.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. 1977. The composition of animal feeds. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 28: 717737.Google Scholar