Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T08:28:50.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autosterilization of the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) in poultry houses in north-east India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Julia Howard  and
Richard Wall
Julia Howard*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
Richard Wall
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
*
Correspondence: Dr J.J. Howard, Department of Biology, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton, SO16 7PX, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Autosterilizing devices, composed of 20×50 cm rectangles of white polyester cloth, baited with 50% w/v sucrose and impregnated with 10% suspension concentrate of the chitin synthesis inhibitor triflumuron, were suspended in two caged-layer poultry houses on a 6 ha farm near Bhubaneswar, Orissa Province, in north-east India. Populations of Musca domestica Linnaeus declined significantly over 6 weeks in houses in which the triflumuron-treated targets had been deployed. Following the removal of the targets from these houses, the M. domestica populations subsequently increased. No comparable changes were observed in a control poultry house in which an equal number of targets, dosed with 50% w/v sucrose only, were suspended. Laboratory evaluation of the sugar-baited triflumuron targets confirmed that exposure of the strain of M. domestica present in the poultry manure to triflumuron-treated targets reduced egg hatch to less than 1%. There was no decline in the quantity of triflumuron present on targets during their 6 week exposure in the poultry houses, as shown by gas chromatography. Furthermore, a laboratory bioassay demonstrated no decrease in the potency of the chemical over the exposure period. However, the quantity of sugar present on targets decreased significantly after only 3 weeks exposure. However, populations in the treatment houses were not eliminated and immigration from surrounding houses may have reduced the effectiveness of the technique. The results are discussed in relation to the use triflumuron-treated targets as a practical autoster-ilizing system for house fly control in livestock production systems.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , August 1996 , pp. 363 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, T.M., Devries, D.H. & Brown, A.W.A. (1978) Induction of resistance to insect growth regulators. Journal of Economic Entomology 71, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D.G. (1972) Insect chemosterilants: a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 61, 577–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, S.W. (1975) Laboratory evaluation of three novel insecticides inhibiting formation against some susceptible and resistant stored product beetles. Journal of Stored Product Research 11, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyte, C.E. (1972) Resistance to synthetic juvenile hormone in a strain of the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Nature 238, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouck, H.K., Meifert, D.W. & Gahan, J.B. (1963) A field experiment with apholate as a chemosterilant for the control of house flies. Journal of Economic Entomology 56, 445–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, J-F. (1993) The role of insect growth regulators in arthropod control. Parasitology Today 9, 471–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosscurt, A.C. & Stoker, A. (1991) Resistance to diflubenzuron in insects. Mededelingen-Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Uni-versiteit Gent 56/3b, 1151–1159.Google Scholar
Hall, M.J.R. & Langley, P.A. (1987) Development of a system for sterilizing tsetse flies, Glossina spp., in the field. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 1, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargrove, J.W. & Langley, P.A. (1990) Sterilizing tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the field: a successful trial. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J.J. & Wall, R. (1995a) The effects if triflumuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor, on the housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 85, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. & Wall, R. (1995b) The use of triflumuron on sugar-baited targets for autosterilization of the housefly Musca domestica. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 77, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. & Wall, R. (1996) Autosterilization of the housefly, Musca domestica, using the chitin synthesis inhibitor triflumuron on sugar-baited targets. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 10, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, F.W. & Cilek, J.E. (1988) Mortality of eggs and larvae obtained from house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) exposed to triflumuron residues. Journal of Economic Entomology 81, 1662–1664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, F.W. & Herald, F. (1982) Congenially induced mortality in face flies (Diptera: Muscidae) following adult exposure to diflubenzuron-treated surfaces. Journal of Medical Entomology 19, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, F.W. & Herald, F. (1983) Mortality of eggs and larvae of the face fly (Diptera: Muscidae) after exposure of adults to surface treated with BAY SIR 8514 and Penfluron. Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 1350–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaBrecque, G.C. & Meifert, D.W. (1966) Control of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in poultry houses with chemosterilants. Journal of Medical Entomology 3, 232–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaBrecque, G.C., Smith, C.N. & Meifert, D.W. (1962) A field experiment in the control of houseflies with chemosterilant baits. Journal of Economic Entomology 55, 449–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBrecque, G.C., Meifert, D.W. & Fye, R.L. (1963) A field study on the control of house flies with chemosterilant techniques. Journal of Economic Entomology 56, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, J.L. Jr. & Simco, J.S. (1969) House fly control by chemical sterilization with apholate. Arkansas Experimental Station Bulletin 737. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Langley, P.A. & Hargrove, J.W. (1990) Control of tsetse fly using pyriproxyfen-baited traps and targets. Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction 5, 403–409.Google Scholar
Langley, P.A. & Weidhaas, D. (1986) Trapping as a means of controlling tsetse: the relative merits of killing and sterilization. Bulletin of Entomological Research 76, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P.A., Felton, T. & Oouchi, H. (1988) Juvenile hormone mimics as effective sterilants for the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 2, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Retnakaran, A., Granett, J. & Ennis, T. (1985) Insect growth regulators. pp. 529–601in Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (Eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, volume 12. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Silhacek, D.L., Oberlander, H. & Zettler, J.L. (1976) Susceptibility of malathion-resistant strains of Plodia interpunctella to juvenile hormone treatments. Journal of Stored Products Research 20, 201–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. (1995) Fatal attraction: the disruption of mating and fertilisation for insect control. pp. 109–128in Leather, S.R. & Hardie, J. (Eds) Insect reproduction Cambridge, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wall, R. & Howard, J.J. (1994) Autosterilization of the housefly Musca domestica. Journal of Theoretical Biology 171, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar