Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T18:40:45.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Climatology of Blowfly Myiasis.

II.—Oviposition and daily Weather Indices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

John Macleod
John Macleod
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture Veterinary Laboratories, Weybridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Records of oviposition by blowflies on test groups of sheep, over a five-year period, were examined for relation between the rate of oviposition per day and the conventional meteorological indices of daily weather conditions. There was a definite correspondence with the maximum shade temperature for the day. The relation was not straight-line, the slope changing at between 18 and 20°C. The association with the minimum temperature was not significant. Insolation, as measured by the difference between maximum temperatures in the sun and shade, was positively associated with oviposition.

The humidity indices—evaporating power of the air and the saturation deficit—and the ratio of the daily totals of rain and evaporation, showed a low correlation ; the rainfall correlation was barely significant. The association was in no instance statistically reliable.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 1949 , pp. 179 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. & Maze, W. H. (1933). Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 58, p. 105.Google Scholar
Bilham, E. G. (1938). The climate of the British Isles. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1935). Trans. roy. Soc. S. Aust., 69, p. 107.Google Scholar
Holdaway, F. G. (1933). J. Anim. Ecol., 2, p. 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, B. E. (1913). Proc. Amer. phil. Soc., 52, p. 257.Google Scholar
Livingston, B. E. (1946). Science, 104, p. 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1943). Bull. ent. Res., 34, p. 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1947). Bull. ent. Res., 38, p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1939). Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 127, p. 473.Google Scholar
Meteorological Office. (1937). Monthly weather report. Summary for the year 1937.—Publ. met. Off., no. 412.Google Scholar
Meteorological Office. (1938). Averages of humidity for the British Isles.—Publ. met. Off., no. 421.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. (1934). Bull. ent. Res., 25, p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J. A. (1931). Bull. Coun. Sci. industr. Res. Aust., no. 52.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical methods. Ames, Iowa St. Coll. Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. B. (1940). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 90, p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar