Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-08T05:16:35.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Copulation behaviour of Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Muscidae) outside and inside the female, with a discussion of genitalic evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2007

R.D. Briceño ,
W.G. Eberhard  and
A.S. Robinson
R.D. Briceño
Affiliation:
Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria, Costa Rica
W.G. Eberhard*
Affiliation:
Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria, Costa Rica Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
A.S. Robinson
Affiliation:
Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Insect Pest Control Sub-Programme, International Atomic Energy Agency, Agency's Laboratories, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +506 228 0001 E-mail: william.eberhard@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If species-specific male genitalia are courtship devices under sexual selection by cryptic female choice, then species-specific aspects of the morphology and behaviour of male genitalia should often function to stimulate the female during copulation. The morphology and behaviour of the complex, species-specific male genitalia of the tsetse fly, Glossina pallidipes Austen, were determined from both direct observations and dissections of flash-frozen copulating pairs; we found that some male genitalic traits probably function to stimulate the female, while others function to restrain her. The male clamps the ventral surface of the female's abdomen tightly with his powerful cerci. Clamping does not always result in intromission. Clamping bends the female's body wall and her internal reproductive tract sharply, posteriorly and dorsally, and pinches them tightly. The male performed sustained, complex, stereotyped, rhythmic squeezing movements with his cerci that were not necessary to mechanically restrain the female and appeared instead to have a stimulatory function. Six different groups of modified setae on and near the male's genitalia rub directly against particular sites on the female during squeezing. The designs of these setae correlate with the force with which they press on the female and the probable sensitivity of the female surfaces that they contact. As expected under the hypothesis that these structures are under sexual selection by female choice, several traits suspected to have stimulatory functions have diverged in G. pallidipes and its close relative, G. longipalpis. Additional male non-genitalic behaviour during copulation, redescribed more precisely than in previous publications, is also likely to have a courtship function. The elaborate copulatory courtship behaviour and male genitalia may provide the stimuli that previous studies showed to induce female ovulation and resistance to remating.

Keywords

tsetse flygenitalic evolutionsexual selection by cryptic female choicesexually antagonistic coevolution
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 97 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 471 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnqvist, G. (1998) Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393, 784–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baena, M. & Eberhard, W.G. (in press) Female resistance behavior in the sepsid fly Archisepsis diversiformis (Diptera: Sepsidae) is not a test of the male's ability to hold on. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution.Google Scholar
Buxton, P.A. (1955) The Natural History of Tsetse Flies. 816 pp. London, H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhury, M.F.B. & Dhadialla, T.S. (1976) Evidence of hormonal control of ovulation in tsetse flies. Nature 260, 243–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumming, J.M., Sinclair, B.J. & Wood, D.M. (1995) Homology and phylogenetic implications of genitalia in Diptera-Eremoneura. Entomologica Scandinavica 26, 120–151.Google Scholar
Curtis, C.F. (1968) Radiation sterilization and the effect of multiple mating of females in Glossina austeni. Journal Insect Physiology 14, 1365–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dame, D.A. & Ford, H.R. (1968) Multiple mating of Glossina morsitans Westw. and its potential effect on the sterile male technique. Bulletin of Entomological Research 58, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies-Cole, J.O.A. & Chaudhury, M.F.B. (1990) Mating efficiency in females of Glossina pallidipes. Insect Science Application 11, 355–361.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. 244 pp. Cambridge, MA, USA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (1991) Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects. Biological Reviews 66, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (1993) Copulatory courtship and genital mechanics in three species of Macrodactylus (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae melolonthidae). Ethology Ecology and Evolution 5, 19–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (1994) Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice. Evolution 48, 711–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, W.G. (1996) Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. 501 pp. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (2001a) Species-specific genitalic copulatory courtship in sepsid flies (Diptera, Sepsidae, Microsepsis). Evolution 55, 93–102.Google ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, W.G. (2001b) Genitalic behavior during copulation in Hybosciara gigantea (Diptera: Sciaridae) and the evolution of species-specific genitalia. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 74, 1–9.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (2004a) Male-female conflicts and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders. Biological Reviews 79, 121–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, W.G. (2004b) Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58, 1947–1970.Google ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, W.G. (2005) Sexual morphology of male Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae): lack of support for sexually antagonistic coevolution and the lock and key hypothesis. Canadian Entomologist 137, 551–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. & Huber, B.A. (1998) Copulation and sperm transfer in Archisepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) and the evolution of their intromittent genitalia. Studia Dipterologica 5, 217–248.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. & Kariko, S. (1996) Copulation behavior inside and outside the beetle Macrohaltica jamaicensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Ethology 14, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowers, W. & Eberhard, W.G. (2006) Fitting together: copulatory linking in some Neotropical Chrysomelidae. Revista de Biologia Tropical 54, 829–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, U., Dyck, V.A., Mattioli, R.C. & Jannin, J. (2005) Potential impact of tsetse fly control involving the sterile insect technique. pp. 701–723in Dyck, V.A., Hendrichs, J. & Robinson, A.S. (Eds) Sterile Insect Technique. Principles and Practice in Area-wide Integrated pest management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, M., Gack, C. & Peschke, K. (1998) Morphology and function of the spermatophore in the rove beetle, Aleochara curtula (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Zoology 101, 34–44.Google Scholar
Foster, W.A. (1976) Male sexual maturation of the tsetse flies Glossina morsitans Westwood and G. austeni Newstead (Dipt., Glossinidae) in relation to blood feeding. Bulletin Entomological Research 66, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillot, C. & Langley, P.A. (1981) The control of receptivity and ovulation in the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans. Physiolgical Entomology 6, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, R.H. & Krafsur, E.S. (2005) Tsetse genetics: contributions to biology, systematics, and control of tsetse flies. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 101–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosken, D. & Stockley, P. (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huyton, P.M. & Langley, P.A. (1982) Copulatory behaviour of the tsetse flies Glossina morsitans and G. austeni. Physiological Entomology 7, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.H.N. (1952) A new specific character for tsetse-flies (Glossina) of the morsitans group. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 46, 218–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenson, T.G.T. (1979a) Mating behaviour of males of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 69, 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenson, T.G.T. (1979b) Mating behaviour of Glossina pallidipes (Diptera, Glossinidae): duration of copulation, insemination and fecundity. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 26, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenson, T.G.T. (1980) Mating behaviour of females of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 70, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocque, R. (1998) Female choice, secondary effect of ‘mate check’? A hypothesis. Belgian Journal of Zoology 128, 99–107.Google Scholar
Jordan, A.M. (1958) The mating behaviour of females of Glossina palpalis (R.-D.) in captivity. Bulletin of Entomological Research 49, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leegwater-van der Linden, M.E. & Tiggelman, E.P.M. (1984) Multiple mating and inseminating potential of Glossina pallidipes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1936) Experimental work with tsetse-fly, Glossina palpalis, in Uganda. Bulletin of Entomological Research 27, 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T.A.M. & Jordan, A.M. (1959) A guide to the identification of the West African species of the fusca group of tsetse-flies, by dissection of the genitalia. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 53, 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newstead, R., Evans, A.M. & Potts, W.H. (1924) Guide to the Study of Tsetse-Flies. 382 pp. London, University Press of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Olet, P.A., Opiyo, E. & Robinson, A.S. (2002) Sexual receptivity and age in Glossina pallidipes Austen (Dipt., Glossinidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 126, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W.S. (1934) Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the species of the genus Glossina Wiedemann based on a comparative study of the male and female terminalia. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 28, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W.S. (1936) Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the species of the genus Glossina Wiedemann based on a comparative study of the male and female terminalia. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 30, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinhâo, R.C. & Grácio, A.J.S. (1973) The degree of spermathecal impregnation and the number of matings in Glossina austenia. Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (Lisboa) 1, 103–106.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.N. (1973) A comparison of the male genitalia and abdominal segmentation in Gasterophilus and Glossina (Diptera), with notes on the gasterophiloid origin of the tsetse flies. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 125, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J.N. (1974) Anatomical relations during sperm transfer in Glossina austeni Newstead (Glossinidae, Diptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 125, 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, W.H. (1970) Systematics and identification of Glossina. pp. 243–273in Mulligan, H.W. (Ed.) The African Trypanosomiases. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Roberts, M.J. (1973) The control of fertilization in tsetse flies. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 67, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, A. (1973) Duration of mating in Glossina pallidipes. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 67, 441–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, D.S. & Dodd, C.H.W. (1972) Mating, insemination, and ovulation in the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans. Journal of Insect Physiology 18, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. & Porter, A.H. (1989) The lock-and-key hypothesis: Evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L.W. (2001) Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in Insects. 448 pp. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Simmons, L.W. & Siva-Jothy, M. (1998) Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. pp. 341–434in Birkhead, T. & Møller, A.P. (Eds) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. New York, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, B.J., Cumming, J.M. & Wood, D.M. (1994) Homology and phylogenetic implications of male genitalia in Dipterra-Lower Brachycera. Entomologica Scandivavica 24, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.S. & Kulathinal, R.J. (2005) Male sex drive and the masculination of the genome. Bioessays 27, 518–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, F.A. (1951) Observations on mating scars in Glossina palpalis (R.-D.). Bulletin of Entomological Research 42, 601–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobe, S.S. & Langley, P.A. (1978) Reproductive physiology of Glossina. Annual Review of Entomology 23, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderplank, F.L. (1947) Experiments in the hybridization of tsetse-flies (Glossina, Diptera) and the possibility of a new method of control. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 98, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, F.L. (1948) Experiments in cross-breeding tsetse-flies (Glossina species). Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 42, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, F.L. (1949a) Variation in the male genitalia of the tsetse fly Glossina pallidipes (Austen) and a note on G. austeni. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London 18, 65–68.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, F.L. (1949b) The classification of Glossina palpalis, including the descriptions of new subspecies and hybrids. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London 18, 69–77.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, F.L. (1949b) Variation in the male genitalia of the tsetse fly Glossina pallidipes (Austen) and a note on G. austeni (Newstead). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London 18, 65–68.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, F.L. (1949c) The classification of Glossina morsitans Westwood Diptera, Muscidae, including a description of a new subspecies, varieties and hybrids. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London 18, 56–64.Google Scholar
Vreysen, M.J.B. & van der Vloedt, A.M.V. (1990) The effect of intersubspecific hybridization and gamma radiation on the reproductive biology of Glossina palpalis palpalis (Robineau-Desvoidy) and Glossina palpalis gamviensis Vanderplank. Annals de Societe Belgique Medicine Tropical 70, 145–158.Google ScholarPubMed
Wall, R. (1988) Tsetse mating behaviour: effects of age and hunger in Glossina morsitans morsitans and G. pallidipes. Physiological Entomology 13, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. & Langley, P.A. (1993) The mating behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina): a review. Physiological Entomology 18, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J. (1984) Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. pp. 283–324in Lewis, T. (Ed) Insect Communication. New York, USA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D.M. (1991) Homology and phylogenetic implications of male genitalia in Diptera. The ground plan. pp. 255–284in Weismann, A., Orszagh, I. & Pont, A. (Eds) Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Dipterology. The Hague.Google Scholar