Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T12:26:31.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the activity of the African dung beetle Catharsius tricornutus De Geer (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the survival and size of the African buffalo fly, Haematobia thirouxi potans (Bezzi) (Diptera: Muscidae), in bovine dung in the laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Bernard M. Doube  and
Farida Moola
Bernard M. Doube
Affiliation:
CSIRO Dung Beetle Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
Farida Moola
Affiliation:
CSIRO Dung Beetle Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of dung burial by the African dung beetle Catharsius tricornutus De Geer on the survival and size of the dung-breeding African fly Haematobia thirouxi potans (Bezzi) was examined in the laboratory at 25°C using 1-litre pads of cattle dung. The experiment included a set of dung pads which were exposed to infrared radiation for 12 h per day to mimic the heating effect of solar radiation. C. tricornutus is a large (1–2-g live weight) dung beetle, and moderate numbers can completely bury dung pads within 24 h of pad colonization. Dung burial was proportional to the number of pairs present (range 0–8 pairs per pad), but the level of burial was reduced in the presence of infrared radiation. Dung pads lost moisture with time, and the rate of desiccation of unburied dung increased with the amount of dung burial and under infrared radiation. Mortality in the immature stages of H. t. potans increased with increasing levels of dung burial and with exposure of pads to infrared radiation. The timing of addition of dung beetles (i.e. before or after egg hatch) did not affect fly survival. At moderate levels of dung burial, fly larvae were killed directly by beetle activity and at high levels of dung burial, fly larvae also perished due to an unfavourable physical environment associated primarily with moisture stress. Infrared radiation killed immature flies and increased the level of moisture stress. There was a low level of survival in dung buried by the beetles under these unnatural laboratory conditions. Stunting of surviving flies was associated with reduced levels of moisture in the core of the unburied dung and was observed when the level of dung burial was >60% in ambient conditions and >40% under infrared radiation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 63 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blume, R. R., Matter, J. J. & Eschle, J. L. (1973). Onthophagus gazella: effect on survival of horn flies in the laboratory.—Environ. Entomol. 2, 811–813.Google Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1970). Insectary studies on the control of dung breeding flies by the activity of the dung beetle, Onthophagus gazella F. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 9, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1976). The Australian dung beetle project 1965–1975.—Aust. Meat Res. Comm. Rev. no. 30, 1–30.Google Scholar
Cook, I. M., Spain, A. V. & Sinclair, D. F. (1980). The effects of the temperature and moisture levels of the larval breeding medium on puparial form in the buffalo fly, Haematobia irritans exigua (Diptera: Muscidae).—Aust. J. Zool. 28, 547–552.Google Scholar
Doube, B. M. (1986). Biological control of the buffalo fly in Australia: the potential of the southern African dung fauna.—pp. 16–34 in Patterson, R. S. & Rutz, D. A. (Eds). Biological control of muscoid flies.—Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. no. 61, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Doube, B. M., Fay, H. A. C. & Aschenborn, H. H. (1982). Rearing the blood-feeding fly Haematobia thirouxi potans in the laboratory.—Onderstepoort J. vet. Res. 49, 255–256.Google Scholar
Doube, B. M. & Moola, F. (1987). Effects of intraspecific larval competition on the development of the African buffalo fly Haematobia thirouxi potans.—Entomologia exp. appl. 43, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P. B. & Aschenborn, H. H. (in press). Patterns of nesting and dung burial in Onitis dung beetles—implications for pasture productivity and fly control.—J. appl. Ecol.Google Scholar
Fay, H. A. C. (1985). Temperature-regulated development rates of the immature stages of the African buffalo fly, Haematobia thirouxi potans (Bezzi) (Diptera: Muscidae).—Environ. Entomol. 14, 38–41.Google Scholar
Fay, H. A. C. & Doube, B. M. (1983). The effect of some coprophagous and predatory beetles on the survival of immature stages of the African buffalo fly, Haematobia thirouxi potans, in bovine dung.—Z. angew. Ent. 95, 460–466.Google Scholar
Ferrar, P. (1975). Preamble for symposium on effects of dung beetles.—J. appl. Ecol. 12, 819–821.Google Scholar
Fincher, G. T. (1981). The potential value of dung beetles in pasture ecosystems.—J. Georgia entomol. Soc. 16 (suppl.), 316–333.Google Scholar
Fullaway, D. T. (1921). Horn fly control.—Hawaii. Forester Agric. 18, 219–221.Google Scholar
Halffter, G. & Edmonds, W. D. (1982). The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae).—176 pp. Mexico, Inst. Ecol.Google Scholar
Halffter, G. & Matthews, E. G. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).—Folia ent. Mex. 12-14, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. (1978). Effects of introduced dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the breeding and abundance of the Australian bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 361–372.Google Scholar
Legner, E. F. (1986). The requirement for reassessment of interactions among dung beetles, symbovine flies, and natural enemies.—pp. 120–131 in Patterson, R. S. & Rutz, D. A. (Eds). Biological control of muscoid flies.—Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. no. 61, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Macqueen, A. (1975). Dung as an insect food source: dung beetles as competitors of other coprophagous fauna and as targets for predators.—J. appl. Ecol. 12, 821–827.Google Scholar
Moon, R. D., Loomis, E. C. & Anderson, J. R. (1980). Influence of two species of dung beetles on larvae of face fly.—Environ. Entomol. 9, 607–612.Google Scholar
Palmer, W. A., Bay, D. E. & Sharpe, P. J. H. (1981). Influence of temperature on the development and survival of the immature stages of horn fly, Haematobia irritans irritans (L.).—Prot. Ecology 3, 299–309.Google Scholar
Palmer, W. A. & Bay, D. E. (1982). Moisture content of the dung pat as a factor in the survival of larval stages of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans irritans (L.).—Prot. Ecology 4, 353–359.Google Scholar
Ridsdill Smith, T. J., Hall, G. P. & Craig, G. F. (1982). Effect of population density on reproduction and dung dispersal by the dung beetle Onthophagus binodis in the laboratory.—Entomologia exp. appl. 32, 80–85.Google Scholar
Sivinski, J. (1983). The natural history of a phoretic sphaerocerid Diptera fauna.—Ecol. Entomol. 8, 419–426.Google Scholar
Walker, J. M. & Doube, B. M. (1984). Susceptibility to drowning of eggs of the dung breeding flies Haematobia irritans exigua and Musca vetustissima (Dipt., Muscidae) in relation to dung beetle activity.—Z. angew. Ent. 98, 518–527.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1974). The biological control of dung.—Scient. Am. 230, 100–109.Google Scholar