Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T08:31:50.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of natural enemies on the growth of Lantana in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. A. Winder  and
K. L. S. Harley
J. A. Winder
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Biological Control Unit, Curitiba, Paraná, 80.000, Brazil
K. L. S. Harley
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observations were made over a two-year period on the growth and natural enemies of Lantana tiliaefolia and L. glutinosa growing naturally at nine sites covering different climatic areas of Paraná State, south Brazil. Lantana was found to be subjected to continuous attack by insects and/or fungi throughout the year, with different species causing damage at different times. Temperate-climate sites had a more diverse complex of insects and a greater intensity of attack than warmer-climate sites. Shrubs in sites which suffered severe insect attack, especially during the previous season, flowered and fruited significantly less than those which had suffered only light attack. Differential weighting of the principal phytophagous insects demonstrated that feeding by insects of some groups may be more damaging than that by others. The relevance of the results to the search for biological agents for control of lantana in Australia is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 599 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, L. A. (1972). The suppression of weeds with insects.—pp. 185–195 in Proceedings Tall Timbers Conference on Ecological Animal Control by Habitat Management, no. 3, February 25–27, 1971, Tallahassee, Florida.—286 pp. Tallahassee, Tall Timbers Res. Stn.Google Scholar
Andres, L. A. & Goeden, R. D. (1971). The biological control of weeds by introduced natural enemies.—pp. 143–164 in Huffaker, C. B. (Ed.). Biological control.—511 pp. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. (1974). Biological control by natural enemies.—323 pp. London, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harley, K. L. S. (1971). Biological control of Lantana.—Pest Artic. & News Summ. 17, 433–437.Google Scholar
Harley, K. L. S. (1974). Biological control of Lantana in Australia.—pp. 23–29 in Wapshere, A. J. (Ed.). Proceedings of the third International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, September 1973.—140 pp. Farnham Royal, Commonw.Agric. Bur. (Misc. Publ. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control no. 8).Google Scholar
Harley, K. L. S. (1979). Considerations in the selection and importation of biological control organisms.—pp. 97–109 in Australian Applied Entomological Research Conference. Queensland Horticultural College, Lawes, June 1979. Invited reviews and situation papers.—258 pp. Canberra, Commonw. Sci. Ind. Res. Org.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1973 a). Weed vulnerability to damage by biological control agents.—pp. 29–33 in Dunn, P. H. (Ed.). Proceedings of the second International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, October 1971.—225 pp. Farnham Royal, Commonw.Agric. Bur. (Misc. Publ. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control no. 6).Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1973 b). Insects in the population dynamics of plants.—pp. 201–209 in van Emden, H. F. (Ed.). Insect/plant relationships.—215 pp. Oxford, Blackwell (Symp. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. no. 6).Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1973 c). The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds.—Can. Ent. 105, 1495–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, N. K., Lamberton, J. A., Sioumis, A. A. & Suares, H. (1976). New triterpenes of Lantana camara. A comparative study of the constituents of several taxa.—Aust. J. Chem. 29, 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, R. J. (1956). Jack pine staminate flower production.—Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. Div. Forest Biol., Ottawa 12 (3), 2.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B. (1958). Principles of biological control of weeds.—Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Ent. 4, 533–542.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B. (1962). Some concepts on the ecological basis of biological control of weeds.—Can. Ent. 94, 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, P. A. & Van Eck, W. A. (1974). Seasonal changes in growth and development of some woody perennials near Kampala, Uganda.—J. Ecol. 62, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köppen, W. (1948). Climatologia. Traduzido da 2a ed. em Alemão por P. R. Perez.—478 pp. Buenos Aires, F.C.E.Google Scholar
Kulman, H. M. (1971). Effects of insect defoliation on growth and mortality of trees.—A. Rev. Ent. 16, 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maack, R. (1981). Geografia fisica do Estado do Paraná.—450 pp. Rio de Janeiro, José Olympio.Google Scholar
Perkins, R. C. L. & Swezey, O. H. (1924). The introduction into Hawaii of insects that attack Lantana.—Bull. Hawaiian Sug. Plrs' Ass. Exp. Stn no. 16, 83 pp.Google Scholar
Radunz, L. A. J. (1971). Some aspects of the preferential behaviour of Teleonemia scrupulosa Stål, towards its host plant Lantana camara.—53 pp. Honours Thesis, Univ. Queensland.Google Scholar
Schultz, D. E. & Allen, D. C. (1977). Effects of defoliation by Hydria prunivorata on the growth of black cherry.—Environ. Entomol. 6, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staley, J. M. (1965). Decline and mortality of red and scarlet oaks.—Forest Sci. 11, 2–17.Google Scholar
Stirton, C. H. (1977). Some thoughts on the polyploid complex Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae).—pp. 321–340 in Proceedings of the 2nd National Weeds Conference of South Africa, Stellenbosch, 1977.—344 pp. Cape Town, A. A. Blakema.Google Scholar
Troll, C. (1966). Seasonal climates of the earth: the seasonal course of natural phenomena in the different climatic zones of the earth.—pp. 19–25 in Landsberg, H. E., Lippman, H., Paffen, K. H. & Troll, C. (Eds.). World maps of climatology.—28 pp. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wapshere, A. J. (1975). A protocol for programmes for biological control of weeds.—Pest Artic. & News Summ. 21, 295–303.Google Scholar
Willson, B. W. (1979). The current status of biological control of rangeland weed projects in Australia.—pp. 214–222 in Australian Applied Entomological Research Conference, Queensland Agricultural College, Lawes, June 1979. Invited reviews and situation papers.—258 pp. Canberra, Commonw. Sci. Ind. Res. Org.Google Scholar
Winder, J. A. & Van Emden, H. F. (1981). Selection of effective biological control agents from artificial defoliation/insect cage experiments.—pp. 415–439 in Del Fosse, E. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the fifth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, July 1980.—649 pp. Melbourne, Commonw. Sci. Ind. Res. Org.Google Scholar
Winder, J. A. & Harley, K. L. S. (1978). Exploration for organisms for biological control of weeds.—pp. 35–38 in Freeman, T. E. (Ed.). Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds.—299 pp. Gainesville, Cent. Environml Prog., Inst. Fd Agric. Sci., Univ. Florida.Google Scholar