Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T00:00:42.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intraspecific antagonism in Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C. D Howick  and
J. W Creffield
C. D Howick
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Building Research, Forest Products Laboratory, Highett, Victoria, Australia
J. W Creffield
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Building Research, Forest Products Laboratory, Highett, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coptotermes acinaciformis (Frogg.) was collected from three different mound colonies and placed in holding jars in a matrix of mound material from an alien colony. After transportation and maintenance in a controlled insectary for 28 days, they were separated from the holding jars and pooled according to colony origin. They were then used in mixed groups of various combinations in a bioassay test of their feeding capacity and survival. Termites from a fourth colony were used to determine whether pooling of individuals originating from the same colony but maintained in different holding jars had any effect on their feeding and survival in the laboratory. It was shown that, although termites from the same original colony can be re-united without detriment after transportation and maintenance, those from different colonies cannot be mixed to form reproducible bioassay groups. Although chilling before mixing produced a slight improvement, the resulting groups were still unsuitable for use in bioassays. It is noteworthy that when brought together after maintenance in the holding jars under identical conditions in an identical matrix, the termites were able to recognise and accept fellows from their own colony and to detect and reject those from other sources.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 17 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, E. A. (1911). Observations on termites in Jamaica.—J. Anim. Behav. 1, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1969). Rearing of termites and testing methods used in the laboratory.— pp. 351–385in Krishna, K. & Weesner, F. M. (Eds.). Biology of termites. Volume I.—598 pp. New York & London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clément, J. L. (1978). L’agression interspécifique et intraspécifique des espéces françaises du genre Reticulitermes (Isoptére).—C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D) 286, 351–354.Google Scholar
Dropkin, V. H. (1946). The use of mixed colonies of termites in the study of host-symbiont relations.—J. Parasti. 32, 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fougerousse, M.. (1973). Some aspects of laboratory and field testing methods of anti-termite wood preservatives.—Holzforschung 27, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, F. J. & Calaby, J. H. (1970). Termites of the Australian region.— pp. 393–448 in Krishna, K. & Weesner, F.M. (Eds.). Biology of termites. Volume II.—643 pp. New York & London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gay, F. J., Greaves, T., Holdaway, F.G. & Wetherly, A. H. (1955). Standard laboratory colonies of termites for evaluating the resistance of timber, timber preservatives, and other materials to termite attack.—Bull. Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Org. no. 277, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Hill, G. F. (1942). Termites (Isoptera) from the Australian Region (including Australia, New Guinea and islands south of the equator between 140°E. longitude and 170° W. longitude).—479 pp. Melbourne, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
Howick, C. D. (1975). Influences of specimen size, test period and matrix on the amounts of wood eaten by similar groups of laboratory termites.— pp. 51–63in Proc. Br. Wood. Preserv. Assoc. Annual Conv., 1975.—174 pp. Southwick, Sussex, England, Grange Press.Google Scholar
Howick, C. D. (1978). Influence of crowding during transportation on survival and laboratory feeding of termites.—J. Inst. Wood Sci. 8, 28–31.Google Scholar
Howick, C. D. & Creffield, J.W. (1975). The development of a standard laboratory bio-assay technique with Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt (Isoptera: Mastotermitidae).—Z. angew. Ent. 78, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howick, C. D. & Tamblyn, N. (1971). Transportation of large numbers of the termite Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) for laboratory testing.—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 10, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdý, I. (1967). Testing of termite resistance of woods.—pp. 113–118 in Proc. Br. Wood Preserv. Assoc. Annual Conv., 1967.—195 pp. South wick, Sussex, England, Grange Press.Google Scholar
Nel, J. J. C. (1968). Aggressive behaviour of the harvester termites Hodotermes mossambicus (Hagen) and Trinervitermes trinervoides (Sjöstedt).—Insectes soc. 15, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen-Sarma, P. K. & Chatterjee, P. N. (1970). Recent trends in laboratory evaluation of termite resistance of wood and wood products.—J. Indian Acad. Wood Sci. 1, 119–128.Google Scholar
Sewell, J. J. (1978). Development pathways and colony organisation in the genus Kalotermes Hagen (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae).—Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Stuart, A. M. (1969). Social behavior and communication.— pp. 193–232 in Krishna, K. & Weesner, F.M. (Eds.). Biology of termities. Volume I.—598 pp. New York & London, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. A. L., Metcalf, E. C. & Sewell, J. J. (1975). Preliminary studies on the control of neotenic formation in Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt (Isoptera).—Insectes soc. 22, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar