Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:53:25.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory evaluation of malathion for controlling the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Hafiz Ahmed
Hafiz Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Queen Elizabeth College, London, W.8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experiments were carried out to remove existing doubts about the toxicity (and therefore cost per unit killing power) of malathion to adults of Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.) which have arisen from earlier field and laboratory tests. Malathion is shown to be almost as toxic to these insects as γ-BHC, but superior in speed of action. These observations are in agreement with the performance of these two compounds in the field.

Subdivision of a dose of malathion with simultaneous application at two loci increased its toxicity. This, as well as other factors, brings the value of LD50 determinations into question. Recommendations for large-scale use of new insectsicides, based only on laboratory data, may not always be reliable.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , July 1969 , pp. 113 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, H. & Gardiner, B. G. (1967). Effect of mineral oil solvent on the toxicity and speed of action of malathion.—Nature, Lond. 214, no. 5095, 1338–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, H. & Gardiner, B. G. (1968 a). Activation of malathion by the locust body wall.—Nature, Lond. 217, 776–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, H. & Gardiner, B. G. (1968 b). Differences in the susceptibility to malathion exhibited by various body regions of the desert locust. In Symposium on the activity of pesticides.—S.C.I. Monogr. 29, 169–180.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. & Abedi, Z. H. (1960). Cross-resistance characteristics of a malathiontolerant strain developed in Aedes aegypti.—Mosquito News 20, 118–124.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1952). Probit analysis. A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve.—2nd edn, 318 pp. Cambridge Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Van Den Heuvel, M. J. & Cochran, D. G. (1965). Cross resistance to organophosphorus compounds in malathion- and diazinon-resistant strains of Blattella germanica.—J. econ. Ent. 58, 872–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Ainsworth, M. & Toms, B. A. (1948). Laboratory studies on the spraying of locusts at rest and in flight.—Anti-Locust Bull. no. 2, 64 pp.Google Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1956). Determination of the resistance of locusts to DNC in relation to their weight, age and sex.—Ann. appl. Biol. 44, 634–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1957). The cumulative toxicity of γ-BHC and diazinon applied in small doses to locusts.—Ann. appl. Biol. 45, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1958 a). The toxicity of insecticides to adult locusts.—J. Sci. Fd Agric. 9, 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1958 b). Spray-collecting area of locusts and their susceptibility to insecticides.—Nature, Lond, 182 no. 4633, 478–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1961). Determination of the resistance of locusts to γ-BHC and diazinon in relation to their age, sex and weight.—Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1962 a). The collection of spray droplets by flying locusts.—Bull. ent. Res. 53, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1962 b). The toxicity of some insecticidal sprays to adult locusts.—Bull. ent. Res. 53, 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1963). Recent development in locust control.—Wld Rev. Pest Control 2 no. 1, 7–17.Google Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1964). Selecting insecticides for grasshopper and locust control.—Int. Pest Control 6 no. 4, 6–9.Google Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1966). Insecticide index.—77 pp. Rome F.A.O., U.N. Dev. Prog. Desert Locust Project.Google Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. & Sawyer, K. F. (1957). The cumulative toxicity of dinitro-o-cresol applied in small doses to locusts.—Bull. ent. Res. 48, 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. & Yeates, M. N. D. B. (1961). Recent laboratory tests of insecticides against locusts.—J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 861–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Yun-Pei (1950). Toxicity index—an improved method of comparing the relative toxicity of insecticides.—J. econ. Ent. 43, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Yun-Pei (1966). Correlation between laboratory and field data on testing insecticides.—J. econ. Ent. 59, 1131–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootten, N. W. & Sawyer, K. F. (1954). The pick-up of spray droplets by flying locusts.—Bull. ent. Res. 45, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar