Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:19:24.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mating of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moths and their host plant origins as larvae within Australian cotton farming systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

G.H. Baker  and
C.R. Tann
G.H. Baker*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences and Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
C.R. Tann
Affiliation:
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences and Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +61 2 6246 4000 E-mail: Geoff.Baker@csiro.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transgenic (Bt) cotton dominates Australian cotton production systems. It is grown to control feeding damage by lepidopteran pests such as Helicoverpa armigera. The possibility that these moths might become resistant to Bt remains a threat. Consequently, refuge crops (with no Bt) must be grown with Bt cotton to produce large numbers of Bt-susceptible moths to reduce the risk of resistance developing. A key assumption of the refuge strategy, that moths from different host plant origins mate at random, remains untested. During the period of the study reported here, refuge crops included pigeon pea, conventional cotton (C3 plants), sorghum or maize (C4 plants). To identify the relative contributions made by these (and perhaps other) C3 and C4 plants to populations of H. armigera in cotton landscapes, we measured stable carbon isotopes (δ13C) within individual moths captured in the field. Overall, 53% of the moths were of C4 origin. In addition, we demonstrated, by comparing the stable isotope signatures of mating pairs of moths, that mating is indeed random amongst moths of different plant origins (i.e. C3 and C4). Stable nitrogen isotope signatures (δ15N) were recorded to further discriminate amongst host plant origins (e.g. legumes from non-legumes), but such measurements proved generally unsuitable. Since 2010, maize and sorghum are no longer used as dedicated refuges in Australia. However, these plants remain very common crops in cotton production regions, so their roles as ‘unstructured’ refuges seem likely to be significant.

Keywords

Bt resistanceHelicoverparefugeshost plant originsrandom mating
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, M.R., Sorenson, C.E., Gould, F. & Bradley, J.R. (2007) Limitations of stable carbon isotope analysis for determining natal host origins of tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 126, 46–52.Google Scholar
Akhurst, R., James, W., Bird, L. & Beard, C. (2003) Resistance to the Cry1Ac: endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1290–1299.Google Scholar
Ambika, T., Sheshshayee, M., Viraktamath, C. & Udayakumar, M. (2005) Identifying the dietary source of polyphagous Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) using carbon isotope signatures. Current Science 89, 1982–1984.Google Scholar
Analytical Software (2000) Statistix 7. User's Manual. Tallahassee, FL, USA, Analytical Software.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Available online at http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@nsf/DetailsPage.Google Scholar
Baker, G.H., Tann, C.R. & Fitt, G.P. (2007) Production of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) from different refuge crops to accompany transgenic cotton plantings in eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 723–732.Google Scholar
Baker, G.H., Tann, C.R. & Fitt, G.P. (2011) A tale of two trapping methods: Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in pheromone and light traps in Australian cotton production systems. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101, 9–23.Google Scholar
Bissoondath, C. & Wiklund, C. (1997) Effect of male body size on sperm precedence in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Behavioural Ecology 8, 518–523.Google Scholar
Brévault, T., Nibouche, S., Achaleke, J. & Carrière, Y. (2012) Addressing the role of non-cotton refuges in delaying Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bt cotton in West Africa. Evolutionary Applications 5, 53–65.Google Scholar
Coleman, D.C. & Fry, B. (Eds) (1991) Carbon Isotope Techniques. San Diego, CA, USA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Downes, S.J., Mahon, R.J. & Olsen, K. (2007) Adaptive resistance management in Australia for Bt-cotton: current status and future challenges. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 95, 208–213.Google Scholar
Downes, S.J., Parker, T.L. & Mahon, R.J. (2009) Frequency of alleles conferring resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in Australian populations of Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from 2002 to 2006. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 733–742.Google Scholar
Downes, S.J., Parker, T.L. & Mahon, R.J. (2010a) Incipient resistance of Helicoverpa punctigera to the Cry2Ab Bt toxin in Bollgard® cotton. PLoS One 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
Downes, S., Mahon, R.J., Rossiter, L., Kauter, G., Leven, T., Fitt, G. & Baker, G. (2010b) Adaptive management of pest resistance by Helicoverpa species (Noctuidae) in Australia to the Cry 2Ab Bt toxin in Bollgard II® cotton. Evolutionary Applications 3, 574–584.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. (2006) Cotton pest management guide. Orange, Australia, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1989) The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 17–52.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1994) Cotton pest management: part 3. an Australian perspective. Annual Review of Entomology 39, 543–562.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (2000) An Australian approach to IPM in cotton: integrating new technologies to minimise insecticide dependence. Crop Protection 19, 793–800.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (2004) Implementation and impact of transgenic Bt cottons in Australia. pp. 371–381in Swanepoel, A. (Ed.) Cotton Production for the New Millenium. Proceedings of the 3rd World Cotton Research Conference. Agricultural Research Council – Institute for Industrial Crops, 9–13 March 2004, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. & Cotter, S. (2004) The Helicoverpa problem in Australia. pp. 45–62in Sharma, H. (Ed.) Heliothis/Helicoverpa Management: Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research. New Delhi, India, Oxford & IBH Publishing.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P., Mares, C.L. & Llewellyn, D.J. (1994) Field evaluation and potential ecological impact of transgenic cottons (Gossypium hirsutum) in Australia. Biocontrol Science and Technology 4, 535–548.Google Scholar
Forrester, N.W., Cahill, M., Bird, L.J. & Layland, J.K. (1993) Management of pyrethroid and endosulfan resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, Supplement 1, 1–144.Google Scholar
Gould, F., Blair, N., Reid, M., Rennie, T., Lopez, J. & Micinski, S. (2002) Bacillus thuringiensis-toxin resistance management: stable isotope assessment of alternate host use by Helicoverpa zea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99, 16581–16586.Google Scholar
Higginson, D., Morin, S., Nyboer, M., Biggs, R., Tabashnik, B. & Carrière, Y. (2005) Evolutionary trade-offs of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis crops: fitness cost affecting paternity. Evolution 59, 915–920.Google Scholar
Huang, F., Andow, D.A. & Buschman, L.L. (2011) Success of the high-dose/refuge resistance management strategy after 15 years of Bt crop use in North America. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 140, 1–16.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Li, D., Xie, B., Ji, R. & Cui, J. (2005) Effect of body size and larval experience on mate preference in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lep., Noctuidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 129, 574–579.Google Scholar
Mahon, R., Olsen, K., Garsia, K. & Young, S. (2007) Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry2Ab in a strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 894–902.Google Scholar
O'Leary, M. (1988) Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. Fractionation techniques may reveal new aspects of carbon dynamics in plants. Bioscience 38, 328–336.Google Scholar
Orth, R.G., Head, G. & Mierkowski, M. (2007) Determining larval host plant use by a polyphagous lepidopteran through analysis of adult moths for plant secondary metabolites. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33, 1131–1148.Google Scholar
Roush, R.T., Fitt, G.P., Forrester, N.W. & Daly, J.C. (1998) Resistance management for insecticidal transgenic crops: theory and practice. pp. 247–257. in Zalucki, M.P., Drew, R.A.I. & White, G.G. (Eds). Pest Management - Future Challenges. Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Applied Entomology Conference. 29 September–2 October 1998, Brisbane, Australia, University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. & Epstein, S. (1971) Two categories of 13C/12C ratios for higher plants. Plant Physiology 47, 380–384.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E. (2008) Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 19029–19030.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E., Dennehy, T.J. & Carrière, Y. (2005) Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 15389–15393.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E., Gassmann, A.J., Crowder, D.W. & Carrière, Y. (2008) Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory. Nature Biotechnology 26, 199–202.Google Scholar
Tann, C., Fitt, G. & Baker, G. (2002) Selecting the right refuges for Bt cotton. Australian Cottongrower 23(1), 10–11.Google Scholar
Wanek, W. & Arndt, S.K. (2002) Difference in δ15N signatures between nodulated roots and shoots of soybean is indicative of the contribution of symbiotic N2 fixation to plant N. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1109–1118.Google Scholar
Zalucki, M.P. & Furlong, M.J. (2005) Forecasting Helicoverpa populations in Australia: a comparison of regression based models and a bio-climatic based modelling approach. Insect Science 12, 45–56.Google Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Daglish, G., Firempong, S. & Twine, P.H. (1986) The biology and ecology of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera (Wallengren) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. What do we know? Australian Journal of Zoology 34, 779–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Gregg, P.C., Fitt, G.P., Murray, D.A.H., Twine, P.H. & Jones, C. (1994) Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera (Wallengren) in the inland areas of eastern Australia: larval sampling and host plant relationships during winter/spring. Australian Journal of Zoology 42, 329–346.Google Scholar