Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T20:13:35.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphology and biometry of larval instars of Pimpla instigator (F.) (Hymen-optera: Ichneumonidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. Rojas-Rousse
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ecologie Expérimentale, Université François Rabelais, Avenue Monge, 37200 Tours, France.
M. Benoit
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ecologie Expérimentale, Université François Rabelais, Avenue Monge, 37200 Tours, France.

Abstract

Larvae of Pimpla instigator (F.) were found to pass through five larval instars during development. Initial studies of external morphology identified only three morphological groups: the primary larva (L1) the intermediate larvae (L24) and the final instar larvae (L5). Biometrical study of the maximum head width, width of buccal mask, inter-metatentorial distance and diameter of spiracles permitted morphological separation of all five larval instars. Under a 16 h photophase (at 25±1°C; 70±10% r.h.) and an 8 h scotophase (at 15±l°C; 80±10% r.h.) the 2nd, 3rd and 4th larval instars were found to last about 24 h each, and the 5th instar 9±1 days. Progressive development of the genital buds during the 5th instar and prepupal stages facilitated sexing of the larvae.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, A. P.. (1963). Life histories and immature stages of four Ichneumonid parasites of the European pine shoot moth Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) in Ontario.—Can. Ent. 95, 10781091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, J. F.. (1959a). Les hotes et les stades immatures des Ichneumonides Pimpla F., Apechthis Först. et Itoplectis Först.—Bull. biol. Fr. Belg. 93, 235259.Google Scholar
Aubert, J. F.. (1959b). Biologie de quelques Ichneumonidae Pimplinae et examen critique de la théorie de Dzierzon.—Entomaphaga. 4, 75190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, B. P.. (1941). A consideration of the cephalic structures and spiracles of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Hym.).—Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 7, 123190.Google Scholar
Bouletreau, M.. (1971). Croissance larvaire et utilisation de l'hôte chez Pteromalus puparum (Hym., Chalc): influence de la densité de population.—Ann. Zool. Ecol. anim. 3, 305318.Google Scholar
Cals, P.. & Kurstak, E.. (1965). Biologie et morphologie comparées des stades larvaires initiaux et terminaux chez Nemeritis canescens Grav. (Hyménoptére, Ichneumonidae) endoparasite d'Ephestia kühniella Zell. (Lepidoptere, Pyralidae).—Revue Zool. agric. appl. 64, 7991.Google Scholar
Cals, P.. & Shaumar, N.. (1965). Biologie et morphologie larvaire comparées de trois Ichneumonides Pimplines.—Annls Sci. nat., Zool. 7, 767790.Google Scholar
Cals-Usciati, J.. (1972). Les relations hôte-parasite dane le couple Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Diptera, Trypetidae) et Opius concolor Szepligetti (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Ann. Zool. Ecol. anim. 4, 427481.Google Scholar
Calvert, D. J.. & Van Den Bosch, R.. (1972). Behavior and biology of Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of dactynotine Aphids.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 773779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, Y.. (1971). Biologie de Pimpla instigator F. 1793 (Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae). I. Mode de perception de l'hôte.—Entomophaga 16, 285296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciochia, V.. (1968). Observations sur la biologie de 1'Ichneumonide Hemiteles melanarius Grav.—Proc. XIII int. Congr. Ent. 1, 489490.Google Scholar
Claret, J.. (1973). La diapause facultative de Pimpla instigator (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). I. Rô1e de la photopériode.—Entomophaga. 18, 409418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, S. A.. & Rotheram, S.. (1965). The life history of the ichneumonid Nemeritis (Devorgilla) canescens (Gravenhorst) as a parasite of the mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia (Anagasta) kuehniella Zeller, under laboratory conditions.—Proc. R. ent. Lond. (A) 40, 6772.Google Scholar
Daviault, L.. (1930). Notes biologiques sur Nemeritis canescens Grav. et sur la morphologie de ses divers stades.—Revue Path. vég. Ent. agric. Fr. 17, 8293.Google Scholar
Laing, D. R.. & Caltagirone, L. E.. (1969). Biology of Habrobracon lineatellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).—Can. Ent. 101, 135142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, J. K. L.. & Oatman, E. R.. (1968). The biology of Campoplex haywardi (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a primary parasite of the potato tuberworm.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61, 2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, N. F.. (1925). Zur Biologie und Morphologie von Pimpla examinator F.—Z. angew. Ent. 11, 202212.Google Scholar
Short, J. R. T.. (1959). A description and classification of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera).—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 110, 391511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodchikoff, C. N.. (1974). Notes on the biology of Therion circumflexum (L.), with a description of the immature stages (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).—Pan-Pacific Ent. 50, 111117.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H.. (1930). Observations on the parasites of the pine-shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana, Schiff.—Bull, ent. Res. 21, 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, A. M.. & Smith, H. D.. (1933). The larval head of parasitic Hymenoptera and nomenclature of its parts.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 26, 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. D.. & Ridgway, R. L.. (1975). Morphology, development, and behavior of the immature stages of the parasitoid, Campoletis sonorensis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68, 191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar