Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:54:59.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple technique for applying small measured quantities of insecticides to insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. D. MacCuaig  and
W. S. Watts
R. D. MacCuaig
Affiliation:
Anti-Locust Research Centre, College House, Wright's Lane, London, W.8
W. S. Watts
Affiliation:
Anti-Locust Research Centre, College House, Wright's Lane, London, W.8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An apparatus is described for applying a very small volume (0.1–1.0 μl.) of an insecticidal solution to an insect. It comprises a length of precision-bore glass capillary mounted, with a calibrated scale, in one end of a short tube having at the other end a perforated rubber bulb; the capillary is filled to the required scale mark by applying cotton wool saturated with the liquid to its tip, and the liquid expressed by squeezing the bulb, with the forefinger covering the hole in it. It can be used in conjunction with a calculator consisting of two concentric rotatable discs bearing two pairs of scales, on one of which the insect weight (in g.) is apposed to the per cent, concentration (w/v) of insecticide to be applied, which enables the volume (in μl.) required to yield a given dose (in μl./g.) to be read from the other pair of scales. Both devices have been used successfully in field testing with locusts and other insects.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , June 1968 , pp. 549 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Busvine, J. R. (1957). A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides.—208 pp. London, Commonw. Inst. Ent.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. A. (1961). Topical application of insecticide solutions to mites and small insects.—N.Z. JI Sci. 4 pp, 534–539.Google Scholar
Hewlett, P. S. & Lloyd, C. J. (1960). Topical application of mobile liquids to insects by means of micro-capillary tubes.—Ann. appl. Biol. 48 pp. 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1961). Determination of the resistance of locusts to γ-BHC and diazinon in relation to their age, sex and weight.—Ann. appl. Biol. 49 pp. 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. & Yeates, M. N. D. B. (1964). The toxicity of some insecticides to first-instar nymphs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk).—Ann. appl. Biol. 54 pp. 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, R. L. (1958). Methods of topical application and injection.—In Shepard, H. H. Ed. Methods of testing chemicals on insects. Vol. I pp. 92–113Minneapolis, Burgess Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Watts, W. S. (1965). The toxicity of some insecticides to army worm.—Occ. Rep. Anti-Locust Res. Cent. no. 6/65.Google Scholar
Watts, W. S. & Steel, E. B. (1965). A report on an advisory visit to Somalia.—U.N. Spec. Fund Desert Locust Project no. UNSF/DL/V/9.Google Scholar