Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:47:10.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Responses of the female Aëdes Mosquito. Part VII.—The Effect of Skin Temperature, Hue and Moisture on the Attractiveness of the Human Hand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. R. Smart  and
A. W. A. Brown
M. R. Smart
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
A. W. A. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hands of warm-skinned Caucasian individuals were significantly more attractive to Aëdes aegypti (L.) than cool-skinned individuals. An artificially cooled hand is very much less attractive than a normal one.

Hands of Negroes were significantly more attractive than those of Orientals, and both were significantly more attractive than those of Caucasians. Hands of dark-skinned Caucasians were significantly more attractive than those of light-skinned Caucasians.

Warmer skins were more attractive even if combined with a lighter skin hue, in Caucasian subjects. Thus skin hue is secondary to skin temperature in deciding the attractiveness of Caucasians.

Hands of individuals with low moisture output were significantly more attractive than those of high moisture output. A hand induced to perspire freely was significantly less attractive than the normal hand.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1956 , pp. 89 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brett, G. A. (1938). On the relative attractiveness to Aëdes aegypti of certain coloured cloths.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 32, pp. 113–124.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1951). Studies of the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part IV. Field experiments on Canadian species.—Bull. ent. Res., 42, pp. 575–582.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1954). Studies on the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part VI. The attractiveness of coloured cloths to Canadian species.—Bull. ent. Res., 45, pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. W. A., Sarkaria, D. S. & Thompson, R. P. (1951). Studies on the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part I. The search for attractant vapours.—Bull. ent. Res., 42, pp. 105–114.Google Scholar
DeLong, D. M. & others. (1945). Rep. nat. Res. Coun. Insect Contr. Comm., no. 176. Washington, D.C. (Abstr. curr. Inf. Insect Contr., (N.S.) nos. 3–11, 1946.)Google Scholar
Gjullin, C. M. (1947). Effect of clothing color on the rate of attack of Aëdes mosquitoes.—J. econ. Ent., 40, pp. 326–327.Google Scholar
Kingscote, A. A. & Francis, J. D. (1954). Studies on the attractancy of laboratory rats to Aedes aegypti L.—Environm. Prot. tech. Rep. Def. Res. Bd Can., no. 5, 23 pp.Google Scholar
Parker, A. H. (1948). Stimuli involved in the attraction of Aëdes aegypti L., to man.—Bull. ent. Res., 39, pp. 387–397.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. G. & Brown, A. W. A. (1951). Studies of the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part III. The response of Aëdes aegypti (L.) to a warm body and its radiation.—Bull. ent. Res., 42, pp. 535–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. P. & Brown, A. W. A. (1955). The attractiveness of human sweat to mosquitoes and the role of carbon dioxide.—Mosq. News, 15, pp. 80–84.Google Scholar
Willis, E. R. (1947). The olfactory responses of female mosquitoes.—J. econ. Ent., 40, pp. 769–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed