Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:53:25.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Techniques for pheromone bioassay studies of ants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Phyllis L. Robertson  and
C. J. Orton
Phyllis L. Robertson
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033, Australia
C. J. Orton
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Techniques and apparatus developed for pheromone bioassay studies of ants are described. They include a ventilated cage, with a blacked-out nest area and a two-compartment arena, in which colonies are maintained in the laboratory, and in which group experiments are carried out; a prey treatment apparatus, in which a stinging ant is clamped at the junction of head and thorax, with its body supported on a length of black nylon tubing which is used as artificial prey after it has been stung for a specified period; an applicator for introducing into the cage artificial prey which have been treated with ant secretions, either by the latter method, or by the direct application of dissected gland material; and a closed-system, pheromone-testing apparatus, in which an ant is held in a perspex observation chamber with controlled lighting, supplied with air at constant temperature, relative humidity and flow rate, and treated with gland odours introduced into the conditioned air.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , November 1971 , pp. 283 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayre, G. L. (1968). Comparative studies on the behaviour of three species of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). I. Prey finding, capture and transport.—Can. Ent. 100, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, M. S. & Wilson, E. O. (1964). The anatomical source of trail substances in formicine ants.—Psyche, Camb. 71, 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossert, W. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1963). The analysis of olfactory communication among animals.—J. theoret. Biol. 5, 443–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brian, M. V. (1951). Ant culture for laboratory experiment.—Ent. mon. Mag. 87, 134–136.Google Scholar
Brown, W. L. Jr (1959). The release of alarm and attack behaviour in some New World army ants.—Psyche, Camb. 66, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, R. M. & Blum, M. S. (1970). Identification of the alarm pheromones of the ant Myrmica brevinodis.—J. insect Physiol. 16, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1947). Chemical insect attractants and repellents.—289 pp. Philadelphia, Blakiston.Google Scholar
Freeland, J. (1958). Biological and social patterns in the Australian bulldog ants of the genus Myrmecia.—Aust. J. Zool. 6, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hangartner, W. (1969). Trail laying in the subterranean ant, Acanthomyops interjectus.—J. Insect Physiol. 15, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1940). The maintenance of high atmospheric humidities for entomological work with glycerol-water mixtures.—Ann. appl. Biol. 27, 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschwitz, U. (1964). Gefahrenalarmstoffe und Gefahrenalarmierung bei sozialen Hymen optera.—Z. vergl. Physiol. 47, 569–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, F. E. & Wilson, E. O. (1968). The alarm-defence system of the ant Acantho myops claviger.—J. insect Physiol. 14, 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Phyllis L. (1971). Pheromones involved in aggressive behaviour in the ant Myrmecia gulosa.—J. insect Physiol. 17, 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaife, S. H. (1955). The Argentine ant iridomyrmex humilis Mayr.—Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 34, 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1910). Ants: their structure, development and behavior.—663 pp. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1959). Source and possible nature of the odor trail of fire ants Solenopsis saevissima.—Science, N.Y. 129, 643–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1962). Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith). I. The organization of mass-foraging.—Anim. Behav. 10, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. & Pavan, M. (1959). Glandular sources and specificity of some chemical releasers of social behaviour in Dolichoderine ants.—Psyche, Camb. 66, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar