Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T05:08:35.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of migration and colonization of the coconut palm by the coconut mite, Eriophyes guerreronis (Keifer) (Acari: Eriophyidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. Moore  and
L. Alexander
D. Moore
Affiliation:
CAB International Institute of Biological Control, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks, SL5 7PY, UK
L. Alexander
Affiliation:
Union Agricultural Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Castries, St Lucia, West Indies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Migration and colonization of the coconut palm by Eriophyes guerreronis (Keifer) was studied in St Lucia in the West Indies. Mites were not found in unfertilized flowers but were present within a few weeks of fertilization. Nuts remained vulnerable to colonization for a number of months, and mites were present on nuts for up to 13 months. Protection of nuts for the first few months after fertilization is of most importance. On the tree, much migration could be due to mites walking in large numbers across nut surfaces, and they could move from one inflorescence to another if the two were in contact. Increased nut damage appeared to encourage mite migration.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 641 - 650
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Griffith, R. (1984). The problem of the coconut mite, Eriophyes guerreronis (Keifer), in the coconut groves of Trinidad and Tobago.—pp. 128–132in Webb, R., Knausenberger, W. & Yntema, L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Food Crops Society, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, Oct. 21–26, 1984. East. Caribbean Cent., Coll. Virgin Islands & Caribbean Food Crops Soc.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. & Espinosa Becerril, A. (1981). The coconut mite Eriophyes guerreronis with special reference to the problem in Mexico.—pp. 113–120in 1981 British Crop Protection Conference. Pests and diseases (11th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference). Proceedings of a conference held at Hotel Metropole, Brighton, England, 11 16–19th, 1981. Vol. 1.—pp. 1–362. Croydon, Br. Crop. Prot. Coun.Google Scholar
Hernandez Roque, F. (1977). Combate químico de eriófido del cocotero Aceria (Eriophyes) guerreronis (K) en la Costa Guerrero.—Agricultura téc. Méx. 4, 23–38.Google Scholar
Julia, J. F. & Mariau, D. (1979). Nouvelles recherches en Côte d'Ivoire sur Eriophyes guerreronis K., acarien ravageur des noix du cocotier.—Oléagineux 34, 181–189.Google Scholar
Mariau, D. & Julia, J. F. (1970). L'acariose à Aceria guerreronis (Keifer), ravageur du cocotier.—Oléagineux 25, 459–464.Google Scholar
Moore, D. (1986). Bract arrangement in the coconut fruit in relation to attack by the coconut mite Eriophyes guerreronis Keifer.—Trop. Agric., Trin. 63, 285–288.Google Scholar