Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T09:31:00.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biology and host specificity of Pareuchaetes aurata aurata (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), a ‘new association’ biological control agent for Chromolaena odorata (Compositae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R.L. Kluge  and
P.M. Caldwell
R.L. Kluge*
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
P.M. Caldwell
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
*
Dr R.L. Kluge, Agricultural Research Council, Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X9059, Pietermaritzburg 3200, Republic of South Africa.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pareuchaetes aurata aurata (Butler) from Chromolaena jujuensis in northern Argentina was tested as a biological control candidate for the composite weed C. odorata. The larvae feed voraciously and complete their development on C. odorata. The host-plant feeding range of P. a. aurata is limited to the genus Chromolaena. It is suggested that the egg-laying behaviour of P. a. aurata, which scatters its eggs around the base of the host-plant, will help to overcome the problem of ant predation which prevented the establishment of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros, which lays its eggs in batches, in South Africa. Any possible benefits of the new association between P. a. aurata and C. odorata may also contribute to the success of this biological control programme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 87 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambika, S.R. & Jayachandra, S. (1990). The problem of Chromolaena weed. Chromolaena odorata Newsletter 3, 1–6.Google Scholar
Bennett, F.D. & Cruttwell, R.E. (1973). Insects attacking Eupatorium odoratum in the Neotropics. 1. Ammalo insulata (Walk.) (Lep. Arctiidae), a potential biotic agent for the control of Eupatorium odoratum L. (Compositae). Technical Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 16, 105–115.Google Scholar
Cock, M.J.W. & Holloway, J.D. (1982). The history of, and prospects for, the biological control of Chromolaena odorata (Compositae) by Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros and allies (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 72, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, W.E., Webster, R.P. & Itagaki, H. (1985). Calling behaviour in arctiid moths: the effects of temperature and wind speed on the rhythmic exposure of the sex attractant gland. Journal of Insect Physiology 31, 815–820.Google Scholar
Cruttwell, R.E. (1972). The insects of Eupatorium odoratum L. in Trinidad and their potential as agents for biological control. PhD Thesis, University of the West Indies. 241 pp.Google Scholar
Cruttwell McFadyen, R.E. (1988). Ecology of Chromolaena odorata in the Neotropics. pp. 13–20 in Muniappan, R. (Ed) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Biological Control of Chromolaena odorata, Bangkok, Thailand 29 02-4 03, 1988.Google Scholar
Dharmadhikari, P.R., Perera, P.A.C.R. & Hansen, T.M.F. (1977). The introduction of Ammalo insulata for the control of Eupatorium odoratum in Sri Lanka. Technical Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 18, 129–135.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D.J. (1988) A review of mechanical and chemical control of Chromolaena odorata in South Africa. pp. 34–40 in Muniappan, R. (Ed) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on the Biological Control of Chromolaena odorata, Bangkok, Thailand. 29 02-4 03, 1988.Google Scholar
Goeden, R.D. (1983) Critique and revision of Harris' scoring system for selection of insect agents in biological control of weeds. Protection Ecology 5, 287–301.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H. & Pimentel, D. (1984) New approach for selecting biological control agents. Canadian Entomologist 116, 1109–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L. Pancho, J.V. & Herberger, J.P. (1977) The World's worst weeds: distribution and biology. 609 pp. Honululu, The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Julien, M.H. (1992) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. 3rd edition. 186 pp. Walling-ford C.A.B.Google Scholar
Kluge, R.L. (1990) Prospects for the biological control of triffid weed, Chromolaena odorata, in southern Africa. South African Journal of Science 86, 229–230.Google Scholar
Kluge, R.L. (1991) Biological control of triffid weed Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae), in South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 37, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I.A.W. & Jarman, M.L. (1985) Invasive alien plants in terrestrial ecosystems of Natal, South Africa. South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 118, 88 pp. Pretoria, Republic of South Africa, CSIR Foundation for Research and Development.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, A.T. (1948) Important sunflower insects and their insect enemies. Journal of Economic Entomology 41, 725–731.Google Scholar
Siebert, T.F. (1988) Biological control of the weed, Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae), by Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) on Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Entomophaga 34, 531–539.Google Scholar
Silva, A.G., Gonçalves, C.R., Galvao, D.M., Conçalves, A.J.L., Gomes, J., Silva, M.D.N. & Simoni, L.D. (1968) Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil, Part II No. 1. 622 pp. Rio de Janiero, Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Todd, A. (1980) Aspects of the biology of Chromolaena odorata (L.) King, R.M. and Robinson, H55 pp. Unpublished Honours Project, University of Durban Westville.Google Scholar
Wapshere, A.J. (1974) A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Annals of Applied Biology 77, 201–211.Google Scholar
Wapshere, A.J. (1985) Effectiveness of biological control agents for weeds: present quandaries. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 13, 261–280.Google Scholar