Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:38:02.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carry-over effect of host nutritional quality on performance of spruce budworm progeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

A. Fuentealba  and
É. Bauce
A. Fuentealba*
Affiliation:
Centre d’Étude de la Forêt and Département des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de foresterie et de géomatique, Université Laval, Québec, Qc, CanadaG1K 7P4
É. Bauce
Affiliation:
Centre d’Étude de la Forêt and Département des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de foresterie et de géomatique, Université Laval, Québec, Qc, CanadaG1K 7P4
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 1-(418) 656-7913 E-mail: alvaro.fuentealba-morales.1@ulaval.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of host nutritional quality on spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens)) parental and offspring performance was studied using field and laboratory rearing experiments, and foliar chemical analyses. Foliage of balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) and black spruce (P. mariana (Mill.) BSP) was used to rear the parental generation in the field, whereas an artificial diet was used to rear the progeny under laboratory conditions. Important differences in the food quality were provided by the three hosts. Black spruce foliage had higher concentrations of certain monoterpene deterrents and total phenolics, together with stronger seasonal declines in nutrients such as N, P and Mg, compared with the other hosts. We hypothesise that this trend may be related to poor performance and survival of the progeny. Laboratory rearing showed that progeny of parents that fed on black spruce exhibited longer developmental times and greater mortality, and had lower pupal mass than progeny of parents fed on the other hosts. Further, artificial food-fed progeny of insects reared on black spruce reached sixth-instar later, with lower mass, and exhibited higher relative growth rate (RGR) than progeny of parents fed on the other hosts. These results suggest nutritionally-based parental effects. These results also confirmed that the quality of food consumed by the parents can influence the fitness of the next generation.

Keywords

spruce budworminsect performancefood qualityblack spruceparental effect
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 275 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, P.J. & Bauce, E. (1994) Feeding preference of fourth- and sixth-instar spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Totricidae) larvae for foliage extracts from young and old balsam fir hosts. Environmental Entomology 23, 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauce, É. (1996) One and two years impact of commercial thinning on spruce budworm feeding ecology and host tree foliage production and chemistry. The Forestry Chronicle 72, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauce, É. & Carisey, N. (1996) Larval feeding behaviour affects the impact of staminate flower production on the suitability of balsam fir trees for spruce budworm. Oecologia 105, 126–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauce, É., Crepin, M. & Carisey, N. (1994) Spruce budworm growth, development and food utilization on young and old balsam fir trees. Oecologia 97, 499–507.Google Scholar
Bauce, É., Kumbaşlı, M., van Frankenhuyzen, K. & Carisey, N. (2006) Interactions among white spruce tannins, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki, and spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), on larval survival, growth, and development. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 2038–2047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bélanger, L., Lemay, S. & Cardinal, P. (2004) Guide d'Identification des Écosystèmes de la Forêt Montmorency. Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt. Université Laval, Québec, QC.Google Scholar
Bidon, Y. (1993) Influence des sucres solubles et de l'azote sur la croissance, le développement et l'utilisation de la nourriture par la tordeuse des bourgeons de l’épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem), Master's thesis, Université Laval, Québec, QC.Google Scholar
Blais, J.R. (1957) Some relationships of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) to black spruce, Picea mariana (Moench) Voss. Forestry Chronicle 13, 364–372.Google Scholar
Blais, J.R. (1965) Spruce budworm outbreaks in the past three centuries in the Laurentide Park, Quebec. Forest Science 11, 130–138.Google Scholar
Carisey, N. & Bauce, É. (1997a) Impact of balsam fir foliage age on sixth-instar spruce budworm growth, development, and food utilization. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carisey, N. & Bauce, É. (1997b) Impact of balsam fir flowering on pollen and foliage biochemistry in relation to spruce budworm growth, development and food utilization. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carisey, N. & Bauce, É. (2002) Does nutrition-related stress carry over to spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) progeny? Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 101–108.Google Scholar
Clancy, K.M. (1992) Response of western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to increased nitrogen in artificial diets. Environmental Entomology 21, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delisle, J. & Hardy, M. (1997) Male larval nutrition influences the reproductive success of both sexes of the Spruce Budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Functional Ecology 11, 451–463.Google Scholar
Diss, A.L., Kunkel, J.G., Montgomery, M.E. & Leonard, D.E. (1996) Effects of maternal nutrition and egg provisioning on parameters of larval hatch, survival and dispersal in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. Oecologia 106, 47–477.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W., Wadell, K.J. & Mousseau, T.A. (1995) Parental host plant affects offspring life histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76, 402–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandtner, M.M. (1966) La Végétation forestière du Québec méridional. Université Laval, Québec, QC.Google Scholar
Grant, G.G., Guo, J., MacDonald, L. & Coppens, M.D. (2007) Oviposition response of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) to host terpenes and green volatiles. Canadian Entomologist 139, 564–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D.O. (1963) Host species and the spruce budworm. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Cananada 31, 219–223.Google Scholar
Han, E.-N. & Bauce, É. (2000) Dormancy in the life cycle of the spruce budworm: physiological mechanisms and ecological implications. Recent Research Development in Entomology 3, 43–54.Google Scholar
Henningar, C.R., MacLean, D.A., Quiring, D.T. & Kershaw, J.A. (2008) Differences in spruce budworm defoliation among balsam fir and white, red, and black spruce. Forest Science 54, 158–166.Google Scholar
Heron, R.J. (1965) The role of chemotactic stimuli in the feeding behavior of spruce budworm larvae on white spruce. Canadian Journal of Zoology 43, 247–269.Google Scholar
Koller, C.N. & Leonard, D.E. (1981) Comparison of energy budgets for spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) on balsam fir and white spruce. Oecologia 49, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavallé, R. & Hardy, Y. (1988) Étude en laboratoire du développement du Choristoneura fumiferana sur l‘Abies balsamea, le Picea glauca et le Picea rubens. Phytoprotection 69, 79–86.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R.K., Mattson, W.J. & Haack, R.A. (1997) White spruce and the spruce budworm: defining the phenological window of susceptibility. Canadian Entomologist 129, 291–318.Google Scholar
Mattson, W.J. & Scriber, J.M. (1987) Nutritional ecology of insect folivores of woody plants: nitrogen, water, fiber, and mineral considerations. pp. 105–146in Slansky, F. & Rodriguez, J.G. (Eds) Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites and Spiders. New York, USA, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mattson, W.J., Haack, R.A., Lawrence, R.K. & Slocum, S.S. (1991) Considering the nutritional ecology of the spruce budworm in its management. Forest Ecology and Management 39, 183–210.Google Scholar
McMorran, A. (1965) A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomologist 97, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nealis, V.G. & Régnière, J. (2004) Insect-host relationships influencing disturbance by the spruce budworm in a boreal mixedwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 1870–1882.Google Scholar
Rossiter, M.C. (1991a) Maternal effects generate variation in life history: consequences of egg weight plasticity in the gypsy moth. Functional Ecology 5, 386–393.Google Scholar
Rossiter, M.C. (1991b) Environmentally-based maternal effects: a hidden force in insect population dynamics? Oecologia 87, 288–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, J.L. (1972) Forest regions of Canada. Publication 1300. Department of Fisheries and the Environment. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2003) SAS/STAT User's Guide, release 9.1 edn. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Slansky, F. (1990) Insect nutritional ecology as a basis for studying host plant resistance. Florida Entomologist 73, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slansky, F. & Scriber, J.M. (1985) Food consumption and utilization. pp. 87–162in Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (Eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, vol. 4. Oxford, UK, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Städler, E. (1974) Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behavior of the Eastern spruce budworm. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 17, 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterner, T.E. & Davidson, A.G. (1982) Forest insect and disease conditions in Canada, 1981. Canadian Forest Service, Environment Canada, Hull, Quebec.Google Scholar
Strunz, G.M., Giguère, P. & Thomas, A.W. (1986) Synthesis of pungenin, foliar constituent of some spruce species, and investigation of its efficacy as a feeding deterrent for spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 251–260.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.W. (1989) Food consumption and utilization by 6th-instar larvae of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana: a comparison on three Picea (spruce) species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 52, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trier, T.M. & Mattson, W.J. (1997) Needle mining by the spruce budworm provides sustenance in the midst of privation. Oikos 79, 241–246.Google Scholar