Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:05:35.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cytogenetic analysis of a new subcomplex of Simulium exiguum (Diptera: Simuliidae) in amazonian Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Charalambous*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology‡, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
M. Arzube
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical, ‘Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez’, Guayaquil, Ecuador
S. Lowell
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology‡, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
*
* Fax +44(0) 171 938 8937 E-mail: mc@nhm.ac.uk

Abstract

Two new cytotypes of the onchocerciasis vector blackfly Simulium exiguum Roubaud are described from amazonian Ecuador. As transmission of the disease does not occur in the region, the two cytotypes are not currently vectors, The Napo form (N = 113) differs cytologically from the chromosomal standard of the species, the Cayapa form, through possession of the fixed paracentric inversions IL-E and IIIL-L; the Huatarac form (N = 22) differs by the fixed inversions IL-L and IIIL-D + L. Both forms form a subcomplex, termed the ‘amazonian’ subcomplex, through sharing the fixed inversion IIIL-L. They also share a number of polymorphic inversions, but neither form possesses sex-linked inversions. The fixed and sex-linked inversions of the previously described Aguarico form were found to be polymorphic and autosomal in the Napo and Huatarac forms, suggesting a close genetic relationship among these forms. The Napo form is distributed throughout the Napo river system (except in the Rio Huatarac) and found in the Rio Aguarico, whereas the Huatarac form is unique to the Rio Huatarac. As their distributions in this study were allopatric, the species status of the two cytotypes could not be tested. The Aguarico form was not found in the Rio Aguarico, nor in any of the other rivers sampled. Whether the Napo form has replaced the Aguarico form in the Rio Aguarico, or whether its absence is due to seasonal variation requires further investigation.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boakye, D.A., Post, R.J., Mosha, F.W., Surtees, D.P. & Baker, R.H.A. (1993) Cytotaxonomic revision of the Simulium sanctipauli subcomplex (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Guinea and the adjacent countries including descriptions of two new species. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charalambous, M., Ready, P.D., Shelley, A.J., Arzube, M. & Lowry, C.A. (1993a) Cytological and isoenzyme analysis of the Bucay and Quevedo cytoforms of Simulium exiguum (Diptera: Simuliidae). Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 88, 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charalambous, M., Shelley, A.J. & Arzube, M. (1993b) The distribution and taxonomic status of chromosomal forms of the onchocerciasis vector Simulium exiguum (Diptera: Simuliidae). Medical and Veterinary Entomology 7, 299303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charalambous, M., Shelley, A.J., Maia, Herzog M. & Luna, Dias A.P.A. (1996) Four new cytotypes of the onchocerciasis vector blackfly Simulium guianense in Brazil. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 10, 111120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charalambous, M., Lowry, C.A., Lowell, S., Shelley, A.J. & Arzube, M. (1997) The value of the larval head pattern for differentiating Simulium exiguum and Simulium gonzalezi in the onchocerciasis focus of Ecuador. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procunier, W.S. (1989) Cytological approaches to simuliid biosystematics in relation to the epidemiology and control of human onchocerciasis. Genome 32, 559569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procunier, W.S., Shelley, A.J. & Arzube, M. (1985) Sibling species of Simulium exiguum: the primary vector of onchocerciasis in Ecuador. Revista Ecuatoriana de Higiene y Medicina Tropical 35, 4959.Google Scholar
Puri, I.M. (1925) On the life history and structure of the early stages of Simuliidae (Diptera, Nematocerca). Parasitology 17, 295334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothfels, K.H. (1987) Cytological approaches to black fly taxonomy. pp. 3952in Kim, K.C. & Merritt, R.W. (Eds) Black flies. Ecology, population management and annotated world list. Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
Shelley, A.J. (1988) Vector aspects of the epidemiology of onchocerciasis in Latin America. Annual Review of Entomology 30, 337366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, A.J. & Arzube, M. (1985) Studies on the biology of Simuliidae (Diptera) at the Santiago onchocerciasis focus in Ecuador, with special reference to the vectors and disease transmission. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79, 328338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, A.J., Arzube, M. & Couch, C.A. (1989a) The Simuliidae (Diptera) of the Santiago onchocerciasis focus of Ecuador. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology Series 58, 79130.Google Scholar
Shelley, A.J., Procunier, W.S. & Arzube, M. (1989b) Dessarollo de la Onchocerca volvulus en dos citospecies de Simulium exiguum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) en el Ecuador. Revista Ecuatoriana de Higiene y Medicina Tropical 39, 923.Google Scholar