Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T01:54:18.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descriptions of Psectrosema spp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) reared from galls on Tamarix spp. in Pakistan, including four new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. M. Harris
K. M. Harris
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, do British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Illustrated descriptions of galls, larvae, pupae and adults, with a diagnostic key, are given for five species of Psectrosema Kieffer (= Amblardiella Kieffer = Isosandalum Kieffer) collected from various species of Tamarix during field surveys of potential biocontrol agents undertaken by the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control in Pakistan. The genus Psectrosema is re-defined and the eleven species previously described from Europe, North Africa, India and Kazakhastan, USSR, are listed, mostly as new combinations. The five species recorded from Pakistan are P. manü nom. nov., stat. rev., comb. n. (= tamaricis Mani) from T. dioica; P. indicum sp.n. from T. indica; P. reticulatum sp.n. from T. hispida, T. androssowii and T. arceuthoides; P. unicornis sp.n. from T. dioica; and P. parvum sp.n. from T. indica.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 447 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, H. G. (1931). Description of Amblardiella tamaricum Kieffer.— Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Afr. N. 22, 271–272.Google Scholar
Baum, B. R. (1978). The genus Tamarix.— 209 pp. Jerusalem, The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
De Stefani Perez, T. (1902). Nuovi insetti galligeni e cecidii vecchi e nuovi.— Marcellia. 1, 109–115.Google Scholar
Debski, B. (1918). Liste des cécidies signalées en Egypte jusqu' ce jour.— Mtm. Soc. ent. Egypte. 1 (4), 38 pp.Google Scholar
Debski, B. (1922). Descriptions d'une cécidie et de l'insecte qui la provoque: Psectrosema alfierii nov. spec. (Cecidomyidae), comparées á celles de Psectrosema debskii (Kieffer, 1912). — Bull. Soc. ent. Égypte. 6 (3), 32–51.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. J. (1973). Family Cecidomyiidae.—pp. 480–517 in Delfinado, M. D. & Hardy, D. E. (Eds.). A catalog of the Diptera of the Oriental Region. Volume I. Suborder Nematoc— era.— 618 pp.Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Gerling, D., Kugler, J. & Lupo, A. (1976). The galls of insects and mites that occur on Tamarix spp. in Israel and the Sinai.— Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Filippo Silvestri. 33, 53–79.Google Scholar
Habib, R. (1983). The bionomics of Psectrosema spp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) reared from galls on Tamarix spp. in Pakistan.— Bull. ent. Res. 73, 457–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1904). Etude sur les cécidomyies gallicoles.— Annls Soc. scient. Brux. 28, 329–350.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1912 a). 228. [Oligotrophus] tamaricum, n.sp.—pp. 126–128 in Houard, C. Les Zoocecidies du Nord de l'Afrique.— Annals Soc. ent. Fr. 81, 1–236.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1912 b). Les cécidomyies du Tamarix.— Marcellia. 11, 169–172.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1913). Diptera Fam. Cecidomyidae.— Genera Insect. 152, 346 pp.Google Scholar
Mani, M. S. (1935). Studies on Indian Itonididae (Cecidomyidae: Diptera). II. Descriptions of new midges and galls.— Rec. Indian Mus. 37, 425–454.Google Scholar
Mani, M. S. (1938). Studies on Indian Itonididae (Cecidomyidae: Diptera). V. Descriptions and records of midges in the Pusa Collection.— Rec. Indian Mus. 40, 331–336.Google Scholar
Marikovskii, P. I. (1961). New gall midges (Diptera, Itonididae) in southeast Kazakhstan [in Russian].— Ent. Obozr. 40, 37–50. [Also seen as English translation in Ent. Rev., Wash. 40, 16–22.]Google Scholar