Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbjwg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T08:46:18.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ecology of the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Kieff.) (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae). I.—Life-history and influence of temperature and moisture on development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. L. Readshaw
Affiliation:
A.B.C. Unit of Insect Physiology, School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Extract

The life-history of Contarinia nasturtii (Kieff.), a gall-forming pest of swedes, was investigated in northern England in 1958–60, particular attention being paid to the influence of temperature and moisture on development in the soil. Most of the observations were made under controlled conditions in the laboratory, although much of the material came from the field.

The adults emerge from the soil, mate, and live 1–3 days. In laboratory conditions, each female developed about 95 eggs, laid in batches of 2–50 on the young leaves of the host plant, and produced 78·7±11·4 unisexual larval progeny. The eggs require moist conditions, and hatched according to temperature after 1–10 days at 30–10°C. The larvae fed for 7–21 days at 25–15°C., producing a gall.

The full-grown larvae burrow into the soil. It was found that they either pupated in oval-shaped cocoons just below the surface, producing adults 10–48 days later (at 25–12°C.) or become dormant in spherical cocoons. At 32·5°C. the pupae died, and below 32·5°C. males developed faster than females by about 24 hours.

Dormancy is caused either by diapause, in which case the larvae require prolonged chilling before development can be resumed, or by drought, in which case development is resumed immediately in response to wetting.

The incidence of diapause increased regularly during the summer generations, probably in response to decreasing day-length, and the larvae tended to avoid diapause when placed in high temperatures (e.g., 25°C.). The firmness of diapause appeared to vary according to the conditions experienced by the feeding and full-grown larvae, but, in general, the larvae completed diapause development after 100 days at 2–5°C. followed by 30 days at 20–25°C., i.e., after exposure to conditions similar to those experienced by the diapause larvae during winter and spring.

Dormancy due to drought (quiescence) affected both non-diapause and post-diapause larvae; the former became quiescent on entering dry soil (pF>3·5–4·0), and the latter remained inactive if kept in dry or even in moist soil (pF 3·4) after completing diapause. In both cases, the termination of dormancy occurred immediately in response to a thorough wetting of the soil. The larvae left their spherical cocoons, moved to the surface, re-entered the ground and pupated in oval cocoons as if entering the soil for the first time.

Factors that delay pupation of C. nasturtii similarly delay the development of its Hymenopterous parasites and hence synchronise the emergence of the adult parasites with the host's feeding stage.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, H. F. (1950). The identity of the swede midge, with notes on its biology.—Ann. appl. Biol. 37 pp. 241248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1952). Studies of fluctuations in insect populations. XII. Further evidence of prolonged larval life in the wheat blossom midges.—Ann. appl. Biol. 39 pp. 370373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1956). Gall midges of economic importance. Vol. VII. Gall midges of cereal crops.—261 pp. London, Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. & Arnold, M. K. (1960). Delayed emergence of the pea midge.—Pl. Path. 9 pp. 5254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovien, P. & Knudsen, P. (1950). Krusesygegalmyggen (Contarinia nasturtii Kieff.), dens biologi og bekaempelse.—Tidsskr. Planteavl 53 pp. 235—257.Google Scholar
Browning, T. O. (1952). The influence of temperature on the completion of diapause in the eggs of Gryllulus commodus Walker.—Aust. J. scient. Bes. (B) 5 pp. 112127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, A. C. (1944). Observations on the biology and physiology of wireworms of the genus Agnates Esch.—Ann. appl. Biol. 31 pp. 235250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickhinger, H. W. (1943). Die Drehherzmücke und ihre Bekämpfung.—Kranke Pflanze 20 pp. 6568.Google Scholar
Hornig, H. (1953). Die Bedeutung der Drehherzmücke (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer) für den Kohlrubenanbau unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der; Vehältnisse in Schleswig-Holstein.—Z. angew, Ent. 35 pp. 271318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1955). The physiology of diapause in arthropods.—Camb. Monogr. exp. Biol. no. 4, 151 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
MacFadyen, A. (1956). The use of a temperature integrator in the study of soil temperature.—Oikos 7 pp. 5681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maelzer, D. A. (1961). The effect of temperature and moisture on the immature stages of Aphodius tasmaniae Hope (Scarabaeidae) in the lower south-east of South Australia.—Aust. J. Zool. 9 pp. 173202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Readshaw, J. L. (1961). The biology and ecology of the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Kieffer) (Diptera: Cecidomyidae).—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Durham.Google Scholar
Richards, L. A. (1947). Pressure-membrane apparatus—construction and use.—Agric. Engng 28 pp. 451454.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K. (1935). The pF of the water in the soil.—Trans. 3rd. int. Congr. Soil Sci. 2 pp. 3748.Google Scholar
Stokes, B. M. (1953a). Biological investigations into the validity of Contarinia species living on the Cruciferae, with special reference to the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Kieffer).—Ann. appl. Biol. 40 pp. 726741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, B. M. (1953b). The host plant range of the swede midge (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer) with special reference to types of plant damage.—Tijdschr. PlZiekt. 59 pp. 8290.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. (1912). Cabbage-top in swedes.—Bull. Univ. Leeds Dep. Agric. no. 82. 21 pp.Google Scholar