Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T15:45:06.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Host-plant on the Resistance of Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) to Insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C. Potter  and
E. M. Gillham
C. Potter
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
E. M. Gillham
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

By means of a laboratory spraying technique, ten comparisons were made of the resistance to rotenone of samples of adult apterous viviparous parthenogenetic females of the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), reared on broad bean and on clover, respectively. In nine of the tests, the Aphids from clover were more resistant than those from broad bean, the ratios ranging from 1·1 to 2·5. These differences were not all significant. In the remaining test the Aphids. from broan bean showed a very small increase in resistance over the Aphids from clover which was not significant.

The Aphids from the clover were generally smaller than those from broad bean. Figures are given to show that while the total amount of poison retained by the larger individuals from broad bean was more than that retained by the smaller individuals from clover, the amount of poison retained per unit body weight was greater with the smaller individuals. It appears, therefore, that while the results obtained might be due, at least partially, to the greater total weight of poison retained by the larger individuals from broad bean, the difference in resistance between the insects from broad bean and clover, respectively, might be even greater if the poison were applied on the basis of equal weight of poison per unit of body weight. Since the difference in resistance between the Aphids from the two host-plants did not appear to depend primarily on difference in size, the assumption might be made that it is due to difference in nutrition. It was found that Aphids reared on clover had a significantly higher proportion of dry matter in their composition than those reared on broad bean, which may be taken as evidence that differences due to nutrition are being produced. These may lead to differences in resistance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 317 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

David, W. A. L. & Bracey, P. (1946). Factors influencing the interaction of insecticidal mists on flying insects. Part III. Biological factors. —Bull. ent. Res, 37, pp. 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, J. C. & Misthic, W. J. jr.(1952). Effect of environmental factors on the toxicity of certain insecticides.—J. econ. Ent, 45, pp. 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, C. D. (1943). The occurrence of physiological races of the Pea Aphid.—J. econ. Ent, 36, pp. 118–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, C. D. (1945). Biological races of the Pea Aphid.—J. econ. Ent, 38, pp. 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. T. (1942). The relative susceptibility of the sexes of Drosophila melanogaster Meigh. to nicotine (alkaloid) used as contact insecticide.—Rep. ent. Soc. Ont, 72, pp. 32–34.Google Scholar
Markos, B. G. & Campbell, F. L. (1943). Effect of host plant on the susceptibility of the Southern Armyworm to calcium arsenate.—J. econ. Ent, 36, pp. 662–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, E. R. & Gersdorff, W. A. (1945). The effect of fly food on resistance to insecticides containing DDT or pyrethrum.—Soap & sanit. Chem, 21, no. 12, pp. 165, 169.Google Scholar
Potter, C. (1952). An improved laboratory apparatus for applying direct sprays and surface films, with data on the electrostatic charge on atomized spray fluids.—Ann. appl. Biol, 39, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. H. & Casanges, A. H. (1942). Studies of nicotine as an insect fumigant.—J. econ. Ent, 35, pp. 242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingle, M. C. (1939). The effect of previous diet on the toxic action of lead arsenate to a leaf-feeding insect.—J. econ. Ent, 32, p. 884.Google Scholar
Tattersfield, F. & Potter, C. (1943). Biological methods of determining the insecticidal values of pyrethrum preparations (particularly extracts in heavy oil).—Ann. appl. Biol, 30, pp. 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yust, H. R. & Howard, L. B. (1942). Factors influencing results of laboratory fumigation of California Red Scale with Hcn.—J. econ. Ent, 35, pp. 821–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar