Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T19:04:49.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertility and Toleration of low Temperature in Euchalcidia caryobori, Hanna (Hymenoptera, Chalcidinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. D. Hanna
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During my work on the life-history of the Chalcid, Euchalcidia caryobori, Hanna (Hanna 1933), which parasitises the pupae and the late larval stages of the Bruchid, Caryoborus pallidus, Oliv., infesting senna pods, great difficulty was experienced in obtaining the material. Infested senna pods arrive in London from the Sudan between June and August. Any pods arriving after or before that are not usually infested to any considerable extent. To guard against this lack of material, a large supply of parasitised and unparasitised pupae of the Bruchid was obtained when available by sifting the senna pods and keeping them in large glass jars at a constant temperature of 27°C. The Chalcid soon emerges and deposits its eggs through the cocoon on the unparasitised pupae of the Bruchid and feeds on peeled sultanas placed on a cardboard tray on top of the material and moistened every day. The sultanas were changed every three days to avoid fermentation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 1935 , pp. 315 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hanna, A. D. (1934). The male and female genitalia and the biology of Euchalcidia caryobori Hanna (Hymenoptera, Chalcidinae).—Trans. Ent. Soc. London 83 pp. 107–136, 23 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, B. (1926). Notes on the influence of temperature and humidity on oviposition and early life of Anopheles.—Rep. U.S. Pub. Health 41 pp. 986–990, 1 tab.Google Scholar
Norris, M. J. (Mrs. O. W. Richards). (1933). Experiments on the factors influencing fertility in Ephestia kühniella Z. (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae).—Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1933 pp. 903–934.Google Scholar
Plough, H. H. & Strauss, M. B. (1923). Experiments on the toleration of temperature by Drosophila.—J. Gen. Physiol. 6 pp. 167–176, 2 tables.Google Scholar
Pospelov (Pospjelow), V. (1911). (Postembryonic development and imaginal diapause in Lepidoptera.) (In Russian, with a German summary.)—Zapiski Kiev Obstch. Estest 21 pp. 163–418, 8 pls., 12 figs.Google Scholar
Sikora, H. (1915). Beiträge zur Biologie von Pediculus vestimenti.—Zbl. Bakt. (I) 76 pp. 523–537.Google Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. (1931). Insects and Climate.—Trans. Ent. Soc. London 79 pp. 1–247.Google Scholar
Voelkel, H. (1924). Zur Biologie und Bekämpfung des Khaprakäfers, Trogoderma granarium, Everts.—Arb. Biol. Anst. Land. Forstw. Berl. 13 pp. 129–172, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Young, W. C. & Plough, N. H. (1926). On the sterilisation of Drosophila by high temperature.—Biol. Bull. 51 pp. 189–197, 3 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar