Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:13:25.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field investigation of an attracticide control technique using the sex pheromone of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M.C.A. Downham ,
L.J. McVeigh  and
G.M. Moawad
M.C.A. Downham*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, UK
L.J. McVeigh
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, UK
G.M. Moawad
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt
*
M.C.A. Downham, Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of trials examining the feasibility of an attracticide technique for control of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) are described. The technique combined the sex pheromone of S. littoralis with pyrethroid insecticide, λ-cyhalothrin, in 500 point-sources/ha at low rates of application of both components. It was envisaged that male moths would be attracted to contact the sources and subsequently suffer lethal or sub-lethal effects which would prevent mating. The pheromone was applied either as a sprayable microencapsulated (MC) formulation or in polyvinyl-chloride lures; emulsifiable concentrate and MC formulations of the insecticide were employed. Treatments were assessed by monitoring pheromone trap catches, mating of tethered females and, in one trial, numbers of eggmasses found in experimental areas. Mating levels and trap-catch in treatment plots were siginificantly reduced, compared to controls, for periods up to 5 and 24 nights after treatment, respectively. However despite a continuous period of mating suppression, achieved by repeated applications, no treatment-related reduction in egg-masses was observed. Two trials compared attracticide with mating-disruption treatments in which the insecticide was omitted. Similar levels of mating and trap-catch suppression were observed in the two treatments. It was concluded that the mating suppression observed in attracticide plots was due principally to disruption of chemical communication between the sexes, not to male mortality arising from contact with the insecticide sources. None of the attracticide treatments represented a viable control technique. Other practical and theoretical considerations arising from the results are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 85 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 463 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beasley, C.A. & Henneberry, T.J. (1984) Combining gossyplure and insecticides in pink bollworm control. California Agriculture 38 (7–8), 22–24.Google Scholar
Campion, D.G., Hunter-Jones, P., McVeigh, L.J., Hall, D.R., Lester, R. & Nesbitt, B.F. (1980) Modification of the attractiveness of the primary pheromone component of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), by secondary pheromone components and related chemicals. Bulletin of Entomological Research 70, 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cork, A., Hall, D.R., Smith, J. & Jones, O.T. (1989) A new resin formulation for controlled release of insect pheromones. Controlled Release Society Inc. 16th International Symposium on controlled release of bioactive materials. Chicago, Illinos, USA, 08 6–9, 1989.Google Scholar
Critchley, B.R. & El-Dieb, Y.A. (1981) An improved pheromone trap for the mass-trapping of cotton leafworm moths in Egypt. Appropriate Technology for Egyptian Agriculture 4, 6–10.Google Scholar
De Souza, K.R., McVeigh, L.J. & Wright, D.J. (1992) Selection of insecticides for lure and kill studies against Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 2100–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkelblum, E., Kehat, M., Gothlif, S., Greenberg, S. & Sklarsz, B. (1982) Optimized mixture of sex pheromonal components for trapping of male Spodoptera littoralis in Israel. Phytoparasitica 10, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.R., Nesbitt, B.F., Marrs, G.J., Green, A. St.J., Campion, D.G. & Critchley, B.R. (1982) Development of microencapsulated pheromone formulations. Insect Pheromone Technology-ACS Symposium series 190, 131–143. American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, K.F., Li, W.-G. & Baker, T.C. (1986) Control of pink bollworm moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) with insecticides and pheromones (attracticidae): lethal and sublethal effects. Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 1466–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, D. & Brassel, J. (1992) ‘Attract and kill’ to control Cydia pomonella and Pectinophora gossypiella. Bulletin IOBC/WPRS 15 (5), 36–39 (Proceedings working group meeting, San Michele All’ adige (Italy), 31 08-3 09 1992).Google Scholar
Hosny, M.M. (1980) The control of cotton pests in Egypt. Outlook on Agriculture 10, 204–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosny, M.M., Iss-hak, R.R., Nasr, El-S.A. & El-Shafei, S.A. (1981) The efficiency of hand picking egg-masses of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in relation to the rate of infestation. Research Bulletin 1529, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Hosny, M.M., Topper, C.P., Moawad, G.M. & El-Saadany, G.B. (1986) Economic damage thresholds of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cotton in Egypt. Crop Protection 5 (2), 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehat, M. & Gordon, D. (1975) Mating, longevity, fertility and fecundity of the cotton leaf-worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Phytoparasitica 3, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehat, M., Gothlif, S., Dunkelblum, E., Bar Shavit, N. & Gordon, D. (1985) Night observations on the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis: reliability of pheromone traps for population assessment and efficacy of widely separated pheromone dispensers for mating disruption. Phytoparasitica 13, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehat, M., Dunkelblum, E., Gothlif, S., Bar Shavit, N., Gordon, D. & Harel, M. (1986) Mating disruption of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoral;is (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in cotton with a polymeric aerosol formulation containing (Z,E)-9, 11-tetradecadieny acetate. Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 1641–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVeigh, E.M., McVeigh, L.J. & Cavanagh, G.G. (1983) A technique for tethering females of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to evaluate pheromone control methods. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 441–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E., Staten, R.T., Nowell, C. & Gourd, J. (1990) Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): point source density and its relationship to efficacy in attracticide formulations of gossyplure. Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 1321–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A. & Carde´, (1988) Disruption of pheromone communication in moths is the natural blend really most efficacious? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 49, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moawad, G.M. (1993) Commercial use of pink bollworm pheromone in Egypt. Bulletin IOBC/WPRS 16 (10), 175 (Proceedings working group meeting, Chatham (United Kingdom), 11–1405 1993).Google Scholar
Moawad, G.M., Khidr, A.A., Zaki, M., Critchley, B.R., McVeigh, L.J. & Campion, D.G. (1991) Large-scale use of hollow fibre and microencapsulated pink bolloworm pheromone formulations integrated with conventional insecticides for the control of the cotton pest complex in Egypt. Tropical Pest Management 37, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, El-S.A., Tucker, M.R. & Campion, D.G. (1984) Distribution of moths of the Egyptian cltton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the Nile dalta interpreted from catches in a pheromone trap network in relation to meteoroloical factors. Bulletin of Entomological Research 74, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B.F., Beevor, P.S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R.G. (1973) Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths Nature New Biology 244, 208–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palaniswamy, P. & Underhill, E.W. (1988) Mechanisms of orientation disruption by sex pheromone components in the redbacked cutworm, Euxoa ochragaster (Gueneé) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 17, 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Underhill, E.W., Gillott, C. & Wong, J.W. (1986) Synthetic sex pheromone components dirupt orientation, but not mating in the fall cankerworm, Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Environmental Entomology 15, 943–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W.L (1978) Threshold hypothesis for pheromone perception. Journal of Chemical Ecology 4, 685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumbo, E.R., Deacon, S.M. & Regan, L.P. (1993) Spatial discrimination between sources of pheromone and an inhibitor by the light-brown apple moths Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Torticidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 953–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D.R., Radwan, S., Jones, K.A., Irving, N.S. & Downham, M.C.A. (1993) Experimental assessment of the impact of defoliation by Spodoptera littoralis on the growth and yield of Giza '75 cotton plants. Crop Protection 12, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckling, D.M. & Shaw, P.W. (1992). Conditions that favormating disruption of Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Torticidae). Environmental Entomology 21, 949–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trematerra, P. & Capizzi, A. (1991) Attracticide method in the control of Ephestia kueniella Zeller: studies on effectiveness. Journal of Applied Entomology 111, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, M.A. & Baker, T.C. (1988) Effects of varying sex pheromone component ratios on the zigzagging flight movements of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta. Journal of Insect Behaviour 1, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzgall, P. (1990) Attraction of Cacoecimorpha pronuba male moths to synthetic sex pheromone blends in the wind tunnel. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 1507–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar