Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:49:49.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host Finding and Selection by Spalangia drosophilae Ashm.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

F. J. Simmonds
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control.

Extract

Experiments were designed to determine the criteria by which an ovipositing female of Spalangia drosophilae Ashm. is attracted to an environment where suitable hosts may be found, and by which these hosts are selected.

The results obtained indicate that ovipositing female Spalangia are attracted to and maintained in areas where suitable host puparia may occur by their reaction to sensory impressions. Thus females tend to be attracted to dampness and to soil level where, in grasses, host material is likely to be found. In such an area searching for hosts appears to be at random, but once an object that is a possible host is located there follows a careful examination and, if the object is “ considered ” a suitable host, oviposition follows. It appears that there are several definite criteria by which an object is accepted as a host suitable for oviposition. In general the hosts selected by the parasite are those which are suitable for the development of her progeny.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Laing, J. (1937). Host-finding by insect parasites. 1. Observations on the finding of hosts by Alysia manducator, Mormoniella vitripennis and Trichogramma evanescens.—J. Anim. Ecol., 6, pp. 298317.Google Scholar
Laing, J. (1938). Host-finding by insect parasites. 2. The chance of Trichogramma evanescens finding its hosts.—J. exp. Biol., 15, pp. 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, D. C. (1938). A study of some factors governing the choice of hosts and distribution of progeny by the Chalcid Ooencyrtus kuvanae Howard.—Phil. Trans., (B) 229, pp. 275322.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1935). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. III. Host selection.—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 117, pp. 413435.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1937). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. V. The sense used by Trichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts.—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 122, pp. 5775.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1938). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VI. Host suitability.—Bull. ent. Res., 29, pp. 223246.Google Scholar
Simmonds, F. J. (1952). Parasites of the frit-fly, Oscinella frit (L.), in eastern North America.—Bull. ent. Res., 43, pp. 503542.Google Scholar
Simmonds, F. J. (1953 a). Inter-relationships of the parasites of the frit-fly, Oscinella frit (L.), in eastern North America.—Bull. ent. Res., 44, pp. 387393.Google Scholar
Simmonds, F. J. (1953 b). Observations on the biology and mass-breeding of Spalangia drosophilae Ashm. (Hymenoptera, Spalangiidae), a parasite of the frit-fly, Oscinella frit (L.).—Bull. ent. Res., 44, pp. 773778.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1938). Further experiments on olfactory conditioning in a parasitic insect. The nature of the conditioning process.—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 126, pp. 370397.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. & Jones, F. G. W. (1937). Olfactory conditioning in a parasitic insect and its relation to the problem of host selection.—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 124, pp. 5681.Google Scholar