Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:23:23.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum Hellen and Diadegma mollipla (Holmgren), parasitoids of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L), feeding on a new host plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2007

A. Rossbach ,
B. Löhr  and
S. Vidal
A. Rossbach
Affiliation:
Institute for Plant Pathology and Plant Protection, Entomol. Section, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Grisebachstrasse 6, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
B. Löhr
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772-00100Nairobi, Kenya
S. Vidal*
Affiliation:
Institute for Plant Pathology and Plant Protection, Entomol. Section, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Grisebachstrasse 6, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +49 (0)551 3912105 E-mail: svidal@gwdg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interspecific competition between an introduced parasitoid species aimed at controlling a herbivorous pest species and a native parasitoid parasitising the same host may influence the success of classical biological control programmes. In Kenya, interspecific competition between an introduced and a local parasitoid on two diamondback moth populations (DBM, Plutella xylostella) was investigated on two different host plants. We tested simultaneous and delayed competition of the local parasitoid Diadegma mollipla Holmgren and its exotic congenus D. semiclausum Hellen on a newly aquired DBM host plant (snowpea) in the laboratory. Under simultaneous competition, D. mollipla produced more progeny than D. semiclausum on snowpea. A head start of D. Mollipla, of four and eight hours before its congenus was introduced, resulted in a similar number of progeny of both species. In delayed competition (time intervals of 24 h, 48 h and 72 h), progeny production was similar for both parasitoids when the time interval was 24 h, irrespective of which species parasitized first. More progeny was produced by the species which attacked first, when the time interval was greater than 24 h, although it was only significant at 72 h. Competitive abilites of both parasitoids on the new host plant differed largely between laboratory and semi-field conditions. The influence of two host plants (snowpea and cabbage) on competition was studied in the greenhouse with different host and parasitoid densities. Parasitism levels of D. semiclausum were significantly higher than those of D. mollipla, regardless of host plant, host and parasitoid densities, but progeny production of D. mollipla on snowpea was still slightly higher than on cabbage. As compared to the confinement of parasitoids and larvae to small containers, D. mollipla parasitized very few larvae in the cages. Competitive ability of the two parasitoid species tested was influenced both by the density of the searching females and by parameters related to either the host plant and/or the herbivorous hosts.

Keywords

interspecific competitionhost plant expansionDiadegma semiclausumDiadegma molliplaPisum sativum
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 135 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, M.S.T. (1988) Biological and ecological studies on Diadegma semiclausum Hellen (Hym., Ichneumonidae), a larval parasite of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae) in Egypt. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 61, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agboka, K., Schulthess, F., Chabi-Olaye, A., Labo, I., Gounou, S. & Smith, H. (2002) Self-, intra-, and interspecific host discrimination in Telenomus busseolae Gahan and T. isis Polaszek (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), sympatric egg parasitoids of the African cereal stemborer Sesamia clasmistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 15, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benrey, B., Denno, R.F. & Kaiser, L. (1997) The influence of plant species on attraction and host acceptance in Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 10, 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billquist, A. & Ekbom, B. (2001) Effects of host plant species on the interaction between the parasitic wasp Diospilus capito and pollen beetles (Meligethes spp.). Agriculture and Forest Entomology 3, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bográn, C.E., Heinz, K.M. & Ciomperlik, M.A. (2002) Interspecific competition among insect parasitoids: field experiments with whiteflies as hosts in cotton. Ecology 83, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokonon-Ganta, A.H., van Alphen, J.J.M. & Neuenschwander, P. (1996) Competition between Gyranosoidea tebygi and Anagyrus mangicola, parasitoids of the mango mealybug, Rastrococcus invadens: interspecific host discrimination and larval competition. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 79, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukovinszky, T., Gols, R., Posthumus, M.A., Vet, L.E.M. & Van Lenteren, J.C. (2005) Variation in plant volatiles and attraction of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Hellén). Journal of Chemical Ecology 31, 461–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chua, T.H., Gonzales, D. & Bellows, T. (1990) Searching efficiency and multiparasitism in Aphidius smithi and Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae), parasites of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera, Aphididae). Journal of Applied Entomology 110, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortesero, A.M., Stapel, J.O. & Lewis, W.J. (2000) Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biological Control 17, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMoraes, C.M. & Mescher, M.C. (2005) Intrinsic competition between larval parasitoids with different degrees of host specificity. Ecological Entomology 30, 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, N., Sanon, A., Monge, J.P. & Huignard, J. (1999) Interspecific relations between two sympatric species of Hymenoptera, Dinarmus basalis (Rond) and Eupelmus vuilleti (Crw), ectoparasitoids of the bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F). Journal of Insect Behavior 12, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Infante, F., Mumford, P., Barrera, J. & Fowler, S. (2001) Interspecific competition between Cephalonomia stephanoderis and Prorops nasuta (Hym., Bethylidae), parasitoids of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Col., Scolytidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 125, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwao, K., Nakamura, S. & Ohsaki, N. (2001) Plant-based host preference and larval competition of the tachinid parasitoid Epicampocera succincta. Population Ecology 43, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S. & Jiang, L. (2003) Differential parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) larvae by the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on two host plants. Bulletin of Entomological Research 93, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, D.C. (1940) Host selection by hymenopterous parasites of the moth Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 128, 451–484.Google Scholar
Löhr, B. & Gathu, R. (2002) Evidence of adaptation of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), to pea, Pisum sativum L. Insect Science and its Application 22, 161–173.Google Scholar
Löhr, B., Gathu, R., Kariuki, C., Obiero, J. & Gichini, G. (2007) Impact of an exotic parasitoid on Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) population dynamics, damage and indigenous natural enemies in Kenya. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 97, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackauer, M. (1990) Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. pp. 41–62in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. & Roland, J. (Eds) Critical Issues in Biological Control. Andover, Hants, UK, Intercept.Google Scholar
McBrien, H. & Mackauer, M. (1990) Heterospecific larval competition and host discrimination in two species of aphid parasitoids: Aphidius ervi and Aphidius smithi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 56, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momanyi, C.M., Löhr, B. & Gitonga, L. (2006) Biological impact of the exotic parasitoid, Diadegma semiclausum (Hellen), of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L., in Kenya. Biological Control 38, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottern, J.L., Heinz, K.M. & Ode, P.J. (2004) Evaluating biological control of fire ants using phorid flies: effects on competitive interactions. Biological Control 30, 566–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muli, B.K., Schulthess, F., Maranga, R.O., Kutima, H.L. & Jiang, N. (2005) Interspecific competition between Xanthopimpla stemmator Thunberg and Dentichasmias busseolae Heinrich (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), pupal parasitoids attacking Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in East Africa. Biological Control 36, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oduor, G.I., Löhr, B. & Seif, A.A. (1996) Seasonality of the major cabbage pests and incidence of their natural enemies in central Kenya. pp. 37–42in Sivapragasam, W.H., Kole, A., Hassan, K. & Lim, G.S. (Eds) The management of diamondback moth and other crucifer pests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on DBM. 29 Oct–1 Nov 1996, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Ohara, Y., Akio, T. & Takabayashi, J. (2003) Response to host-infested plants in females of Diadegma semiclausum Hellen (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 38, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pijls, J.W.A.M., Hofker, K.D., Van Staalduinen, M.J. & Van Alphen, J.J.M. (1995) Interspecific host discrimination and competition in Apoanagyrus (Epidinocarsis) lopezi and A. (E.) diversicornis, parasitoids of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti. Ecological Entomology 20, 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitz, S.R. & Trumble, J.T. (2002) Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 435–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossbach, A., Löhr, B. & Vidal, S. (2005) Generalism versus specialism: Responses of Diadegma mollipla (Holmgren) and Diadegma semiclausum (Hellen), to the host shift of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) to peas. Journal of Insect Behavior 18, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossbach, A., Löhr, B. & Vidal, S. (2006a) Host shift to peas in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and response of its parasitoid Diadegma mollipla (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossbach, A., Löhr, B. & Vidal, S. (2006b) Parasitism of Plutella xylostella L. feeding on a new host plant. Environmental Entomology 35, 1350–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossbach, A., Löhr, B. & Vidal, S. (2006c) Does a specialist parasitoid adapt to its host on a new host plant? Journal of Insect Behavior 19, 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute 1999–2000 (1999) SAS/STAT. The SAS system for Windows, Version 8.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shi, Z.H., Li, Q.B. & Li, X. (2004) Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum Hellen (Hym., Ichneumonidae) and Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) (Hym., Braconidae) in parasitizing Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 128, 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sithole, R. (2005) Life history parameters of Diadegma mollipla (Holmgren), competition with Diadegma semiclausum Hellen (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and spatial and temporal distribution of the host, Plutella xylostella (L.) and its indigenous parasitoids in Zimbabwe. PhD thesis, University of Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Talekar, N.S. & Shelton, A.M. (1993) Biology, ecology and management of the diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talekar, N.S. & Yang, J.C. (1991) Characteristic of parasitism of diamondback moth by two larval parasites. Entomophaga 36, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamò, C., Roelfstra, L.L., Guillaume, S. & Turlings, T.C. (2006) Odour-mediated long-range avoidance of interspecific competition by a solitary endoparasitoid: a time-saving foraging strategy. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 1091–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullyett, G.C. (1943) Some aspects of parasitism in field populations of Plutella maculipennis Curt. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 6, 65–80.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G.C. (1947) Mortality factors in populations of Plutella maculipennis Curtis (Tinedae: Lep), and their relation to the problem of control. Entomology Memoirs, Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Union of South Africa 2, 77–202.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, T.V. (1964) Experimental studies on superparasitism and multiparasitism in Horogenes cerophaga (Grav.) and Hymenobosmina rapi (Cam.), the larval parasites of Plutella maculipennis (Curt.). Indian Journal of Entomology 26, 1–32.Google Scholar
Wang, X.-G. & Keller, M.A. (2002) A comparison of the host-searching efficiency of two larval parasitoids of Plutella xylostella. Ecological Entomology 27, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X.-G. & Messing, R.H. (2003) Intra- and interspecific competition by Fopius arisanus and Diachasmimorpha tryoni (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), parasitoids of tephritid fruit flies. Biological Control 27, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X.G., Duff, J., Keller, M.A., Zalucki, M.P., Liu, S.S. & Bailey, P. (2004) Role of Diadegma semiclausum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in controlling Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Cage exclusion experiments and direct observations. Biocontrol Science and Technology 14, 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J.C., Chu, Y.I. & Talekar, N.S. (1994) Studies on the characteristics of parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lep.: Plutellidae) by larval parasite Diadegma semiclausum (Hym.: Ichneumonidae). Entomophaga 39, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar