Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:13:15.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mating system, age, and reproductive performance in Tenuisvalvae notata, a long-lived ladybird beetle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

Amanda C. Túler
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
C.S.A. Silva-Torres*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Agronomia – Entomologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos 52171-900, Recife – PE, Brazil
J.B. Torres
Affiliation:
Departamento de Agronomia – Entomologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos 52171-900, Recife – PE, Brazil
R.B. Moraes
Affiliation:
Departamento de Agronomia – Entomologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos 52171-900, Recife – PE, Brazil
A.R.S. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal Goiano – Campus Rio Verde, Diretoria e Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação; Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence Tel: +55 81 3320-6218 Fax: +55 81 3320 6205 E-mail: christian.silva@ufrpe.br

Abstract

The long-lived polygynandrous ladybird beetle Tenuisvalvae notata (Mulsant) found in Brazil was evaluated in the laboratory for the effects of multiple mating and aging on its reproductive performance. This species is native to South America and is an important predator of mealybugs. Specifically studied were partner choice, female reproductive success, adult longevity, male virility, and offspring development. Young (5–10 days old) and older virgin females (95–100 days old) were subjected to either a single mate or multiple mating with the same or different males of various mating status (virgin or previously mated once, twice, and thrice). Results revealed a preference in both genders to mate with previously known partners. Additionally, younger females had higher fecundity and greater longevity when mated only once in comparison to those mated multiple times. Fecundity, fertility, and offspring development were similar across the treatments regardless of the number of mating or male mating history. Fecundity and fertility decreased throughout the oviposition period regardless of mating treatment.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J.R. & Zhang, Q.H. (2016) Chemical ecology of neuroptera. Annual Review of Entomology 61, 197218.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J.R., Oliver, J.E., Taghizadeh, T., Ferreira, J.T.B. & Liewehr, D. (1999) Pheromones and colonization: reassessment of the milkweed bug migration model (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae: Lygaeinae). Chemoecology 9, 6371.Google Scholar
Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60, 145164.Google Scholar
Avila, F.W., Sirot, L.K., LaFlamme, B.A., Rubinstein, C.D. & Wolfner, M.F. (2011) Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. Annual Review of Entomology 56, 2140.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P.R.R., Oliveira, M.D., Giorgi, J.A., Silva-Torres, C.S.A. & Torres, J.B. (2014a) Predatory behavior and life history of Tenuisvalvae notata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) under variable prey availability conditions. Florida Entomologist 97, 10261034.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P.R.R., Oliveira, M.D., Giorgi, J.A., Oliveira, J.E.M. & Torres, J.B. (2014b) Suitability of two prey species for development, reproduction, and survival of Tenuisvalvae notata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 107, 11021109.Google Scholar
Bayoumy, M.H. & Michaud, J.P. (2014) Female fertility in Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is maximized by polyandry, but reduced by continued male presence. European Journal of Entomology 4, 513520.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, D.D., Mishra, G. & Omkar, S.K. (2016) Last male wins the egg fertilization fight: a case study in ladybird, Menochilus sexmaculatus. Behavioural Processes 131, 18.Google Scholar
Chauhan, K.R., Levi, V., Zhang, Q.H. & Aldrich, J.R. (2007) Female golden eyed lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysopa oculata) approach but seldom enter traps baited with the male-produced compound, iridodial. Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 17511755.Google Scholar
Colares, F., Michaud, J.P., Torres, J.B. & Silva-Torres, C.S.A. (2015) Polyandry and male mating history affect the reproductive performance of Eriopis connexa (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 108, 736742.Google Scholar
Dowling, D.K., Williams, B.R. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. (2014) Maternal sexual interactions affect offspring survival and ageing. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, 8897.Google Scholar
Dreyer, B.S., Neuenschwander, P., Baumgärtner, J. & Dorn, S. (1997) Trophic influences on survival, development and reproduction of Hyperaspis notata (Col., Coccinellidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 121, 249256.Google Scholar
Dunn, D.W., Sumner, J.P. & Goulson, D. (2005) The benefits of multiple mating to female seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida (Diptera: Coelpidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58, 128135.Google Scholar
Fassotte, B., Francis, F. & Verheggen, F.J. (2016) The scent of love: how important are semiochemicals in the sexual behavior of lady beetles? Journal of Pest Science 89, 347358.Google Scholar
Fisher, D.O., Double, M.C., Blomberg, S.P., Jennions, M.D. & Cockburn, A. (2006) Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature 444, 8992.Google Scholar
Fox, W.C. & Rauter, C.M. (2003) Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5, 273286.Google Scholar
Gay, L., Hosken, D.J., Eady, P., Vasudev, R. & Tregenza, T. (2010) The evolution of harm-effect of sexual conflicts and population size. Evolution 65, 725737.Google Scholar
Gillott, C. (2003) Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 163184.Google Scholar
Haddrill, P.R., Shuker, D.M., Amos, W., Majerus, M.E.N. & Mayes, S. (2008) Female multiple mating in wild and laboratory populations of the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata. Molecular Ecology 17, 31893197.Google Scholar
Hollander, M. & Gwynne, D.T. (2009) Female fitness consequences of male harassment and copulation in seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus. Animal Behaviour 78, 10611070.Google Scholar
Hotzy, C., Polak, M., Rönn, J.L. & Arnqvist, G. (2012) Phenotypic engineering unveils the function of genital morphology. Current Biology 22, 22582261.Google Scholar
Jiaqin, X., Yuhong, Z., Hongsheng, W., Ping, W., Congshuang, D. & Hong, P. (2014) Effects of mating patterns on reproductive performance and offspring fitness in Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 153, 2023.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T. (1996) Dynamics of sperm transfer, mixing, and fertilization in Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Kenya. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89, 238242.Google Scholar
Klein, J.P. & Moeschberger, M.L. (2003) Survival Analysis. Spinger, 441p.Google Scholar
Kvarnemo, C. & Simmons, L.W. (2013) Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368, 20120042. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0042Google Scholar
Majerus, M.E.N. (1994) Female promiscuity maintains high fertility in ladybirds (Col. Coccinellidae). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 130, 205209.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.W. & Matthews, J. R. (2010) Insect Behavior, 514p. London, Springer.Google Scholar
McDonald, G.C. & Pizzari, T. (2016) Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70, 209220.Google Scholar
Michaud, J.P., Bista, M.G. & Omkar, M. (2013) Sexual activity diminishes male virility in two Coccinella species: consequences for female fertility and progeny development. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103, 570577.Google Scholar
Mirhosseini, M.A., Michaud, J.P., Jalali, M.A.A. & Ziaaddini, M. (2014) Paternal effects correlate with female reproductive stimulation in the polyandrous ladybird Cheilomenes sexmaculata. Bulletin of Entomological Research 104, 480485.Google Scholar
Mishra, G. & Omkar, (2006) Ageing trajectory and longevity trade-off in an aphidophagous ladybird, Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 103, 3340.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Charmantier, A., Nussey, D.H. & Ricklefs, R.E. (2008) The evolutionary ecology of senescence. Functional Ecology 22, 371378.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E. (1850) Species des Coleopteres trimeres securipalpes. Annales des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, d’ Agriculture et d'Industrie 2, 11104.Google Scholar
Omkar, & Mishra, G. (2005). Mating in aphidophagous ladybirds: costs and benefits. Journal of Applied Entomology 129, 432436.Google Scholar
Omkar, , Singh, S.K. & Mishra, G. (2010) Multiple matings affect the reproductive performance of the aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Coelophora saucia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 107, 177182.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. (1983) Mate quality and mating decision. pp. 141166. in Bateson, P. (ed.), Mate Choice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. & Birkhead, T.R. (2013) Polyandry: the history of a revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368, 20120335. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0042Google Scholar
Parker, G.A., Lessells, C.M. & Simmons, L.W. (2013) Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male–male competition. Evolution 67, 95109.Google Scholar
Peronti, A.L.B.G., Martinelli, N.M., Alexandrino, J.G., Marsaro Júnior, A.L., Penteado-Dias, A.M. & Almeida, L.M. (2016) Natural enemies associated with Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 99, 2125.Google Scholar
Perry, J.C. & Rowe, L. (2010) Condition-dependent ejaculate size and composition in a ladybird beetle. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London 277, 36393647.Google Scholar
Perry, J.C. & Tse, C.T. (2013) Extreme costs of mating for male two-spot ladybird beetles. PLoS ONE 8, e81934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081934.Google Scholar
Pervez, A., Omkar, & Richmond, A.S. (2004) The influence of age on reproductive performance of the predatory ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. Journal of Insect Science 4, 0108.Google Scholar
Sanches, N.F. & Carvalho, R.S. (2010) Procedimentos para manejo da criação e multiplicação do predador exótico Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. p5. Cruz das Almas, EMBRAPA, Circular Técnica 99.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2002) SAS/STAT 9.2, User's Guide. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Semyanov, V.P. (1970) Biological properties of Adalia bipunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in conditions of Leningrad region. Zashchita Rastenii Vredit Bolez 127, 105112.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Alcock, J. (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, 325p. Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Michaud, J.P., Zhang, R., Zhang, F. & Liu, S. (2009) Seasonal cycles of assortative mating and reproductive behaviour in polymorphic populations of Harmonia axyridis in China. Ecological Entomology 34, 483494.Google Scholar