Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T16:16:13.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on Aëdes aegypti, L. (Dipt. Culic.) under controlled Atmospheric Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. J. Lewis
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Extract

Methods of breeding and manipulating Aëdes aegypti are described. Experiments on length of life were carried out with 534 mosquitos under eleven sets of conditions of atmospheric temperature and humidity. Also, 379 females were given an opportunity to suck blood under 11 sets of conditions. The following conclusions were reached :—

1. The length of life of starved mosquitos at 23°C. is very much dependent on humidity, but it cannot be directly related to saturation deficiency.

2. In these experiments there is no significant difference between the mean survivals of males and females, the former being generally longer.

3. The survival periods of fed and unfed females have a similar relation to humidity, the fed ones surviving the conditions for a longer period, irrespective of the date of feeding.

4. The effect of a change of temperature of 7°C. on the survival at 23°C. and 30°C. is much less than would be expected when the long survival period at 10°C. is considered.

5. In the absence of any efficient physiological adaptation for retarding loss of water, the females, possibly for this reason, seek a blood meal mainly in saturated air at the temperature of maximum activity.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonne-Wepster, J. & Brug, S. L. (1932). The subgenus Stegomyia in Netherland India.—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Nederl.-Indie, Bij. ii, 85 pp.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1931). The measurement and control of atmospheric humidity in relation to entomological problems.—Bull. Ent. Res., xxii, pp. 431447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1933). The effect of climatic conditions upon populations of insects.—Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. & Hyg., xxvi, pp. 325356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, M. E. (1922). Renseignements sur l'Aëdes calopus (Stegomyia).—Mexico ; abstr. in Bull. Off. Int. Hyg. Publ., xv, p. 506.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. (1922). Notes on the bionomics of Stegomyia calopus, Meigen, in Brazil, Part 2.—Ann. Trop. Med. & Parasitol., xvi, pp. 425439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, L. O., Dyar, H. G. & Knab, F. (1912). The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies. Vol. 1. Washington.Google Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1932). Methods of rearing and maintaining large stocks of fleas and mosquitoes for experimental purposes.—Bull. Ent. Res., xxiii, pp. 2531.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. J. (1932). The mosquitoes of Wicken Fen.—The Natural History of Wicken Fen, Part VI, pp. 548559.Google Scholar
Macgregor, M. E. (1929). The significance of pH in the development of mosquito larvae.—Parasitology, xxi, pp. 132157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchoux, E., Salimbeni, A. & Simond, P. L. (1903). La fièvre jaune.—Ann Inst. Past., xvii, pp. 665731.Google Scholar
Mayne, B. (1930). A study of the influence of relative humidity on the life and infectibility of the mosquito.—Ind. J. Med. Res., xvii, pp. 11191137.Google Scholar
Necheles, H. (1927). Observations on the causes of night activity in some insects.—Chinese J. Physiol., i, pp. 143156.Google Scholar
Rudolfs, W. (1925). Relation between temperature, humidity and activity of house mosquitoes.—J. N.Y. Ent. Soc., xxxiii, pp. 163169.Google Scholar